Hello,
I just got some buildd log's from one of my packages and they all failed
because I put all the dh_* stuff in binary-indep instead of binary-arch.
(It's a python module with a small C-library attached, I naively just
copied over some other python module's rules file and forgot the change
Magnus Ekdahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
when I use tasksel and choose the C/C++ development task, tasksel wants to
replace bison++ with bison.
The following packages will be REMOVED:
bison++
The following NEW packages will be installed:
bison
[...]
The problem here isn't that the
Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[snip]
Even which pure_install, the empty dir is created. I don't understand
the difference from pure_install to install anyway, the rules file of
the package I used as an example last year invoked pure_install.
I found out why I don't have to remove
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 10:11:30 -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even which pure_install, the empty dir is created. I don't understand
the difference from pure_install to install anyway, the rules file of
the package I used as an example last year invoked pure_install.
I
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 10:55:00AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
1. Shouldn't lintian complain about this when Architecture is set to
'any' and binary-arch is empty but binary-indep is crowded?
File a wishlist bug against lintian.
2. Yesterday evening I uploaded another (new) python program.
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Steve Langasek wrote:
(GNU makefile snippet):
export DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
export DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)
[...]
If this is the recommended way to call ./configure, should it
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 11:31:04AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Also, to canonicalize the host and build values, the above should be
./configure --build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)-gnu --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)-gnu \
... (other configure options) ..
No. For i386,
Hello,
I just got some buildd log's from one of my packages and they all failed
because I put all the dh_* stuff in binary-indep instead of binary-arch.
(It's a python module with a small C-library attached, I naively just
copied over some other python module's rules file and forgot the change
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Steve Langasek wrote:
(GNU makefile snippet):
export DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
export DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)
[...]
If this is the recommended way to call ./configure, should it any
Magnus Ekdahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
when I use tasksel and choose the C/C++ development task, tasksel wants to
replace bison++ with bison.
The following packages will be REMOVED:
bison++
The following NEW packages will be installed:
bison
[...]
The problem here isn't that the
Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[snip]
Even which pure_install, the empty dir is created. I don't understand
the difference from pure_install to install anyway, the rules file of
the package I used as an example last year invoked pure_install.
I found out why I don't have to remove empty
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 11:31:04AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Also, to canonicalize the host and build values, the above should be
./configure --build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)-gnu
--host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)-gnu \
... (other configure options) ..
No. For
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 10:11:30 -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even which pure_install, the empty dir is created. I don't understand
the difference from pure_install to install anyway, the rules file of
the package I used as an example last year invoked pure_install.
I found
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 10:55:00AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
1. Shouldn't lintian complain about this when Architecture is set to
'any' and binary-arch is empty but binary-indep is crowded?
File a wishlist bug against lintian.
2. Yesterday evening I uploaded another (new) python program.
14 matches
Mail list logo
