On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:21:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Marco Presi wrote:
My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
different man pages (in fact server-enhanced has more config
options that server) but it would nice if the man pages could have
the
|| On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 20:21:09 -0400
|| Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jh Marco Presi wrote:
My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
different man pages (in fact server-enhanced has more config
options that server) but it would nice if the man
Marco,
My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
different man pages (in fact server-enhanced has more config
options that server) but it would nice if the man pages could have
the same name (server.conf.5)
Actually the server program itself should have the
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 06:27:05PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
So dh_builddeb just says the command returned an error code, without
specifying which command (dpkg-deb?) or which error.
Run dh_buildeb -v to get the command it is running, you should then be
able to reproduce it manually by
|| On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 00:16:26 +0200
|| Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sr Marco,
My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
different man pages (in fact server-enhanced has more config
options that server) but it would nice if the man pages could
Marco Presi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sr Hrm, the cleanest solution would be to send the manpages to the upstream
sr maintainer and have him edit the build scripts so that the correct
sr manpage gets installed.
It is not possible, because the man pages were written by
me. Pristine source
Hello,
I would like to compile some packages optimised for my processor. I have k6
at home and pentiumII at work, and would like to speed up some programs
running on those.
I'd like to do it that way that my package would not cause any conflicts,
and would not be automatically replacedm
I've tried the solution proposed by Joey (using the .TH field in the
man source), but it didn't work... so I think the only way is to do
it manually as many of you have suggested.
Oh hmm, I'd forgotten that the .TH line typically has the man page name
in all upper-case, which means there is
On Mon, 2002-09-09 at 13:19, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
Provides: libogg0
Replaces: libogg0
Conflicts: libogg0
However, when trying to install this, i got some errors about other packages
depending on libogg0, thus libogg0 was not removed, and my package was not
installed.
dpkg -I
Hi mentors,
is possible to have an Arch: field defined by a substvar?
Our problem (with our = debian ocaml maintainers) is that ocaml native
code compiler isn't available for all architectures supported by debian,
and, even if we have a bytecode compiler available everywhere, we can
want to
- On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
- I tried to unpack libogg0 package, change its name to libogg0-k6, and add
- these to control file:
-
- Provides: libogg0
- Replaces: libogg0
- Conflicts: libogg0
-
- However, when trying to install this, i got
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
Hello,
I would like to compile some packages optimised for my processor. I have k6
at home and pentiumII at work, and would like to speed up some programs
running on those.
How about installing pentiumbuilder, configure
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 07:02:34PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
- That would require versioned dependencies on virtual packages (versioned
- Provides:) to work, but they don't. You'll probably have to use
- something like a high epoch instead.
Pardon? Does that
- - That would require versioned dependencies on virtual packages (versioned
- - Provides:) to work, but they don't. You'll probably have to use
- - something like a high epoch instead.
-
- Pardon? Does that mean there's no possibility to provide one package bye
- another one, for other
- I'd like to do it that way that my package would not cause any conflicts,
- and would not be automatically replacedm therefore I think it would be best
- to name these packages like $package-$cpu
-
- Look at how the atlas2 package does this.
I did it - it seems it has multiple modules for
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:06:58PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
- Not if other packages declare *versioned* dependencies on it.
hmmm should I now blame someone or is it unexpected situation that is not
expected to happen and there is no solution now (except the one below)?
It's been
Hi!
Can you remind me where should I upload a non-us package?
TIA
Richard.
--
First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they
fight you. Then you win. - Mohandas Gandhi.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:21:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Provided your packages conflict, you can make two files,
debian/server.conf.5 and debian/server-enhanced.conf.5. Make the latter
have the same .TH line at the top as does the former,
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:39:09PM +0200, Ryszard Lach wrote:
Can you remind me where should I upload a non-us package?
non-us.debian.org. By scp, upload to /org/non-us.debian.org/incoming/.
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi mentors,
is possible to have an Arch: field defined by a substvar?
Our problem (with our = debian ocaml maintainers) is that ocaml native
code compiler isn't available for all architectures supported by debian,
and, even if we have a
On Sat, 7 Sep 2002 00:04:16 -0300
Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
A package that I maintain -- mp3blaster -- doesn't include libsidplay1
as a dependency, even though it links against it. I hadn't noticed that
because I thought everything was working fine, as I hadn't tried to
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:21:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Marco Presi wrote:
My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
different man pages (in fact server-enhanced has more config
options that server) but it would nice if the man pages could have
the same
|| On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 20:21:09 -0400
|| Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jh Marco Presi wrote:
My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
different man pages (in fact server-enhanced has more config
options that server) but it would nice if the man
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 06:27:05PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
So dh_builddeb just says the command returned an error code, without
specifying which command (dpkg-deb?) or which error.
Run dh_buildeb -v to get the command it is running, you should then be
able to reproduce it manually by
|| On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 00:16:26 +0200
|| Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sr Marco,
My problem is this: for the two packeges I want to have two
different man pages (in fact server-enhanced has more config
options that server) but it would nice if the man pages could
Marco Presi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sr Hrm, the cleanest solution would be to send the manpages to the upstream
sr maintainer and have him edit the build scripts so that the correct
sr manpage gets installed.
It is not possible, because the man pages were written by
me. Pristine source
Hello,
I would like to compile some packages optimised for my processor. I have k6
at home and pentiumII at work, and would like to speed up some programs
running on those.
I'd like to do it that way that my package would not cause any conflicts,
and would not be automatically replacedm
I've tried the solution proposed by Joey (using the .TH field in the
man source), but it didn't work... so I think the only way is to do
it manually as many of you have suggested.
Oh hmm, I'd forgotten that the .TH line typically has the man page name
in all upper-case, which means there is
On Mon, 2002-09-09 at 13:19, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
Provides: libogg0
Replaces: libogg0
Conflicts: libogg0
However, when trying to install this, i got some errors about other packages
depending on libogg0, thus libogg0 was not removed, and my package was not
installed.
dpkg -I
Hi mentors,
is possible to have an Arch: field defined by a substvar?
Our problem (with our = debian ocaml maintainers) is that ocaml native
code compiler isn't available for all architectures supported by debian,
and, even if we have a bytecode compiler available everywhere, we can
want to
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
Problem:
I tried to unpack libogg0 package, change its name to libogg0-k6, and add
these to control file:
Provides: libogg0
Replaces: libogg0
Conflicts: libogg0
However, when trying to install this, i got some
- On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
- I tried to unpack libogg0 package, change its name to libogg0-k6, and add
- these to control file:
-
- Provides: libogg0
- Replaces: libogg0
- Conflicts: libogg0
-
- However, when trying to install this, i got some
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
Hello,
I would like to compile some packages optimised for my processor. I have k6
at home and pentiumII at work, and would like to speed up some programs
running on those.
How about installing pentiumbuilder, configure
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
I'd like to do it that way that my package would not cause any conflicts,
and would not be automatically replacedm therefore I think it would be best
to name these packages like $package-$cpu
Look at how the atlas2 package
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:06:58PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
- Not if other packages declare *versioned* dependencies on it.
hmmm should I now blame someone or is it unexpected situation that is not
expected to happen and there is no solution now (except the one below)?
It's been a
Hi!
Can you remind me where should I upload a non-us package?
TIA
Richard.
--
First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they
fight you. Then you win. - Mohandas Gandhi.
So, I'm working on a Java package (Jakarta's commons-httpclient) that
requires the JSSE [1] to compile, although it doesn't require it to
run. There are legal issues with the JSSE package that would prevent
it from being packaged for Debian, however [2].
One workaround I can think of for this
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:13:13PM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
- Look at how the atlas2 package does this.
I did it - it seems it has multiple modules for multiple instruction sets.
However, that would require me to recompile those packages which sems like
no good idea (it will be
Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:21:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Provided your packages conflict, you can make two files,
debian/server.conf.5 and debian/server-enhanced.conf.5. Make the latter
have the same .TH line at the top as does the former,
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:39:09PM +0200, Ryszard Lach wrote:
Can you remind me where should I upload a non-us package?
non-us.debian.org. By scp, upload to /org/non-us.debian.org/incoming/.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi mentors,
is possible to have an Arch: field defined by a substvar?
Our problem (with our = debian ocaml maintainers) is that ocaml native
code compiler isn't available for all architectures supported by debian,
and, even if we have a
41 matches
Mail list logo
