subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:17:28PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't covered in the policy)
is the practice of deleting the .pyc files in debian/rules, and
then running compileall.py in the postinst. Would someone comment on
this? Is it a
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:12:31AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:17:28PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't covered in the policy)
is the practice of deleting the .pyc files in debian/rules, and
then running compileall.py
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:58:45PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
BTW, i have tried to install the J2sdk1.4 packages, but they complain
about a missing j2se-common.
Add main to sources.list along with non-free.
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
In the original version of my package, I just listed a Depends on
java-common. Is this still appropriate, even though I know that not
every package that provides java-common will work with my package?
Hi
java-common is NOT a
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:43:10PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
In the original version of my package, I just listed a Depends on
java-common. Is this still appropriate, even though I know that not
every package that provides
Sven == Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sven BTW, i have tried to install the J2sdk1.4 packages, but they
Sven complain about a missing j2se-common. Is this the same
Sven package as java-common ?
Someone else already metioned it but you needto add main to you
bacldown mirror
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 07:49:10AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
Sven == Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sven BTW, i have tried to install the J2sdk1.4 packages, but they
Sven complain about a missing j2se-common. Is this the same
Sven package as java-common ?
Someone else
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:21:45AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
Should I file a bug against my own package to report the related problem,
that libxmltv-perl should depend on libhtml-tableextract-perl (=1.08-1),
or should I just track this on my own?
A good rule of thumb is that if you
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 05:02:27AM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
Well, the changelog doesn't really matter, as few people ever look at
it.
I strongy object to both of these assertions. Developers, myself included,
read changelogs constantly, and it is important for them to be useful and
Matt,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:19:34AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 05:02:27AM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
Well, the changelog doesn't really matter, as few people ever look at
it.
I strongy object to both of these assertions. Developers, myself included,
read
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:06:55PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
they are not included because that would just be extra space taken up in
the .deb file for something which can be generated on the users machine.
No, that is the point of a .deb, to pre-generate and pre-install things for
the user.
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:19:34 -0500
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the changelog doesn't really matter, as few people ever look at
it.
I strongy object to both of these assertions. Developers, myself
included, read changelogs constantly, and it is important for them to be
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 09:45:43AM +1300, Michael Beattie wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
If they did the sponsoring badly, yes. He/She
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:33:50PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe the incorrect overrides mail is sent to the uploader, not to
the maintainer. As such, it most likely went to the sponsor, who was
(correctly) the uploader for the package.
Hello,
I have finished my packaging of IRE, a role playing game engine similar to
ultima 6. I am looking for people to test/check my package and for a sponsor to upload
it for me.
You can find this package at http://alexandre.pineau.free.fr/ire_debian.htm
Thanks for your help!
You should list the working package first :
working-java | java-common
And it should look like this instead.
working-jvm | java-virtual-machine.
Ok. I will change it to:
Depends: kaffe | java-virtual-machine, java-common
Is this correct?
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 08:08:57PM +0100, Alexandre Pineau wrote:
I have finished my packaging of IRE, a role playing game engine similar to
ultima 6. I am looking for people to test/check my package and for a sponsor to
upload it for me.
You can find this package at
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 08:08:57PM +0100, Alexandre Pineau wrote:
Hello,
I have finished my packaging of IRE, a role playing game engine similar to
ultima 6. I am looking for people to test/check my package and for a sponsor to
upload it for me.
You can find this package at
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:33:50PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe the incorrect overrides mail is sent to the uploader, not to
the maintainer. As such, it most likely went to the sponsor, who was
Hi KEN,
(B
(B -Original Message-
(B From: Kenneth Pronovici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
(B Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:10 AM
(B To: Ola Lundqvist; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
(B [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B Subject: Re: j2sdk build-depends cannot be satisfied?
(B Ok. I will change it to:
$ apt-cache show kaffe
..snip..
Provides: java-virtual-machine, java-runtime, java1-runtime
So, kaffe provides java-virtual-machine. You don't need to write dependency
for kaffe.
Ok, that makes sense.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Homepage:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 08:08:57PM +0100, Alexandre Pineau wrote:
I have finished my packaging of IRE, a role playing game engine similar to
ultima 6. I am looking for people to test/check my package and for a sponsor to
upload it for me.
You can find this package at
okamototk == okamototk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi KEN,
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Pronovici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:10 AM
To: Ola Lundqvist; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: j2sdk build-depends cannot be satisfied?
$B!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!!z!!!y!!(B
(B
$B!!#W(-#E(-#E(-#K(-#L(-#Y(-!z(B
$B!!(,(0(,(0(,(0(,(0(,(0(,(0(B
$B!!#W(-#E(-#E(-#K(-#L(-#Y(-!y(B
$B!!(,(0(,(0(,(0(,(0(,(0(,(0(B
(B
(B
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:17:28PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't covered in the policy)
is the practice of deleting the .pyc files in debian/rules, and
then running compileall.py in the postinst. Would someone comment on
this? Is it a
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:43:10PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
In the original version of my package, I just listed a Depends on
java-common. Is this still appropriate, even though I know that not
every package that provides
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:12:31AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:17:28PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't covered in the policy)
is the practice of deleting the .pyc files in debian/rules, and
then running compileall.py
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:58:45PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
BTW, i have tried to install the J2sdk1.4 packages, but they complain
about a missing j2se-common.
Add main to sources.list along with non-free.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sven == Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sven BTW, i have tried to install the J2sdk1.4 packages, but they
Sven complain about a missing j2se-common. Is this the same
Sven package as java-common ?
Someone else already metioned it but you needto add main to you
bacldown mirror
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:21:45AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
Should I file a bug against my own package to report the related problem,
that libxmltv-perl should depend on libhtml-tableextract-perl (=1.08-1),
or should I just track this on my own?
A good rule of thumb is that if you
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 05:02:27AM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
Well, the changelog doesn't really matter, as few people ever look at
it.
I strongy object to both of these assertions. Developers, myself included,
read changelogs constantly, and it is important for them to be useful and
Matt,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:19:34AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 05:02:27AM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
Well, the changelog doesn't really matter, as few people ever look at
it.
I strongy object to both of these assertions. Developers, myself included,
read
You should list the working package first :
working-java | java-common
And it should look like this instead.
working-jvm | java-virtual-machine.
Ok. I will change it to:
Depends: kaffe | java-virtual-machine, java-common
Is this correct?
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:06:55PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
they are not included because that would just be extra space taken up in
the .deb file for something which can be generated on the users machine.
No, that is the point of a .deb, to pre-generate and pre-install things for
the user.
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:19:34 -0500
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the changelog doesn't really matter, as few people ever look at
it.
I strongy object to both of these assertions. Developers, myself
included, read changelogs constantly, and it is important for them to be
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 09:45:43AM +1300, Michael Beattie wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
If they did the sponsoring badly, yes. He/She
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:33:50PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe the incorrect overrides mail is sent to the uploader, not to
the maintainer. As such, it most likely went to the sponsor, who was
(correctly) the uploader for the package.
Hello,
I have finished my packaging of IRE, a role playing game engine similar
to ultima 6. I am looking for people to test/check my package and for a sponsor
to upload it for me.
You can find this package at http://alexandre.pineau.free.fr/ire_debian.htm
Thanks for your help!
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 08:08:57PM +0100, Alexandre Pineau wrote:
I have finished my packaging of IRE, a role playing game engine similar
to ultima 6. I am looking for people to test/check my package and for a
sponsor to upload it for me.
You can find this package at
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 08:08:57PM +0100, Alexandre Pineau wrote:
Hello,
I have finished my packaging of IRE, a role playing game engine similar
to ultima 6. I am looking for people to test/check my package and for a
sponsor to upload it for me.
You can find this package at
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:33:50PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe the incorrect overrides mail is sent to the uploader, not to
the maintainer. As such, it most likely went to the sponsor, who was
Hi KEN,
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Pronovici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:10 AM
To: Ola Lundqvist; debian-java@lists.debian.org;
debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: j2sdk build-depends cannot be satisfied?
Ok. I will change it to:
$ apt-cache show kaffe
..snip..
Provides: java-virtual-machine, java-runtime, java1-runtime
So, kaffe provides java-virtual-machine. You don't need to write dependency
for kaffe.
Ok, that makes sense.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Homepage:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 08:08:57PM +0100, Alexandre Pineau wrote:
I have finished my packaging of IRE, a role playing game engine similar
to ultima 6. I am looking for people to test/check my package and for a
sponsor to upload it for me.
You can find this package at
okamototk == okamototk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi KEN,
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Pronovici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:10 AM
To: Ola Lundqvist; debian-java@lists.debian.org;
debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: j2sdk
Sven == Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sven Yes, thanks it works fine (altough the postinst try to
Sven install the plugin to mozilla-cvs, which does not exist and
Sven thus the postinst fails)
Hmm, I'll have to look at that.
Sven Which GR ? The one about removing
If you want to specify which of a set of real packages should be the
default to satisfy a particular dependency on a virtual package, you
should list the real package as an alternative before the virtual one.
If kaffe works for Kenneth, I guess his Depends line is fine. By the
Hi
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:10:04AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
You should list the working package first :
working-java | java-common
And it should look like this instead.
working-jvm | java-virtual-machine.
Ok. I will change it to:
Depends: kaffe |
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 10:31:43AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi KEN,
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Pronovici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:10 AM
To: Ola Lundqvist; debian-java@lists.debian.org;
debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject:
50 matches
Mail list logo
