On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 10:36:03AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Why does it think rsh-client is a virtual package?
It is a mixed virtual package. There is a real package rsh-client, but also
several other packages provide rsh-client (apt-cache showpkg rsh-client).
___
/ Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi Arnaud
|
| On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:42:34PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
| / Gergely Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to
|
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Michael Still wrote:
I have been an open source developer for some time, and am now an
experienced Debian user (a whole week under my belt!).
Heh.
I am interested in getting some of my code available as Debian packages,
but the web pages I have been reading imply that it
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:00:30AM +1100, Michael Still wrote:
I am interested in getting some of my code available as Debian packages,
but the web pages I have been reading imply that it is a bad thing to
attempt a library as a first package. Unfortunately most of my code
depends on libraries
hey mentors,
i have a hypothetical situation for you. let's say i were working
on a package for sugarplum. now this package is understandably the
bane of most spam harvesters out there, enough that they've probably
put in a rule to avoid directories named /sugarplum on most peoples
web servers.
Aaron Haviland wrote:
Bob Proulx cursed the gypsies with this chant:
Bug 179614! It appears to me that this is a similar but not quite
identical problem. In that bug the packages were all real packages
and none of them were virtual. I could not deduce that any of them
were virtual. So
Hi,
I handle non confile configuration files using ucf (which
could do with more testing and wider deployment.
manoj
Package: ucf
Priority: optional
Section: utils
Installed-Size: 120
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: all
Version: 0.11
Filename:
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 10:36:03AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Why does it think rsh-client is a virtual package?
It is a mixed virtual package. There is a real package rsh-client, but also
several other packages provide rsh-client (apt-cache showpkg rsh-client).
Hey,
I have been an open source developer for some time, and am now an
experienced Debian user (a whole week under my belt!).
I am interested in getting some of my code available as Debian packages,
but the web pages I have been reading imply that it is a bad thing to
attempt a library as a
___
/ Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi Arnaud
|
| On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:42:34PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
| / Gergely Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | If debmake is out-of-date, what are the best tools used today to
|
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Michael Still wrote:
I have been an open source developer for some time, and am now an
experienced Debian user (a whole week under my belt!).
Heh.
I am interested in getting some of my code available as Debian packages,
but the web pages I have been reading imply that it
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:00:30AM +1100, Michael Still wrote:
I am interested in getting some of my code available as Debian packages,
but the web pages I have been reading imply that it is a bad thing to
attempt a library as a first package. Unfortunately most of my code
depends on libraries
hey mentors,
i have a hypothetical situation for you. let's say i were working
on a package for sugarplum. now this package is understandably the
bane of most spam harvesters out there, enough that they've probably
put in a rule to avoid directories named /sugarplum on most peoples
web servers.
Bob Proulx cursed the gypsies with this chant:
Colin Watson wrote:
It's a false positive, yes. Please file it as a bug against lintian
(also compare #179614).
Bug 179614! It appears to me that this is a similar but not quite
identical problem. In that bug the packages were all real
Aaron Haviland wrote:
Bob Proulx cursed the gypsies with this chant:
Bug 179614! It appears to me that this is a similar but not quite
identical problem. In that bug the packages were all real packages
and none of them were virtual. I could not deduce that any of them
were virtual. So
Hi,
I handle non confile configuration files using ucf (which
could do with more testing and wider deployment.
manoj
Package: ucf
Priority: optional
Section: utils
Installed-Size: 120
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: all
Version: 0.11
Filename:
16 matches
Mail list logo
