On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
Would anything else be there?
Bits and pieces of state. There are no hidden bugs, if that's what you
mean.
Oooh, the irony. I've just this minute been poking around in the archived
bugs, and came across 20879.log which is chmod o-r (the only one
Nobody wants to do that.
Still, I am back on my must join Debian kick and I really intend
to join. It may take years, oh well. Instead of adopting a package
I have resurrected one:
http://www.gyrodynamic.net/debian/xdrum [nat'ted .. slow]
I took this package, see xdrum_1.5.tar.gz and built it
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 06:34:37PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
Bits and pieces of state. There are no hidden bugs, if that's what you
mean.
Oooh, the irony. I've just this minute been poking around in the archived
bugs, and came across 20879.log
B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
I'd use my http://www.gyrodynamic.net/spacecommander_0.3.3-2.tgz
Space Commander program, but it is has languished for a very long
time. Poor old program. Nevertheless, if that is what it takes I
will ressurect it and hack in Text Elite or something.
Sorry, broken link.
[This is probably going to sound hypocritical coming from a DD, or
excessively harsh, but try and stick with me]
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
I would really like to be a contributing member of Debian,
but it is the chicken and egg thing. I can't help until I
become a member,
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 03:08:22AM -0500, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
Still, I am back on my must join Debian kick and I really intend
to join. It may take years, oh well. Instead of adopting a package
I have resurrected one:
http://www.gyrodynamic.net/debian/xdrum [nat'ted .. slow]
If
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 03:21:22AM -0500, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
I'd use my http://www.gyrodynamic.net/spacecommander_0.3.3-2.tgz
Space Commander program, but it is has languished for a very long
time. Poor old program. Nevertheless, if that is what it takes I
will
I really could give a ratt's a$$ about a Debian email address, that is
the least of my concerns. Just what I don't need is another email address.
Still, I have been a staunch Debian advocate for over ten years, and I have
installed it for several friends of mine, including some pesky laptop
Yeah, my Netwinder is flaky, and it is NAT'ted to port 13808
because of Charter.Net blocking port 80. I used to have the
xdrum_1.7.orig.tar.gz online, but I wrote xdrum_1.7 and I just
made it a Debian native package, hence no need for the original.
If you look in the dir, xdrum_1.5.tar.gz was the
B. Douglas Hilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree. Thus the real answer to my query. This makes it very hard
to apply because you need an advocate before you even apply, so nobody
even knows you are alive. It would be nice if there was a pre-applicant
Well, basically you need to somehow
[Please don't send me private copies of replies to list mail - thanks.]
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:09:22AM -0500, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 03:08:22AM -0500, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
Still, I am back on my must join Debian kick and I really intend
to
B. Douglas Hilton (2003-04-04 04:55:35 -0500) :
[...]
I dunno. I remember submitting a bug report for Debian/Arm last year
because something trivial ( can't remember now ) was messed up. I
don't generally submit bug reports, because I generally don't have
any problems with Debian that I
hi
I would like to sponsor a package of a friend
the first time, I (of course) check the package
(lintian, install it, etc etc)
but what about the next times? what is the best practice?
1) simply resign it, and upload.
2) rebuild it from source each time
I would prefer the 1st , for
Hello:
I'm looking for someone who is interested in sponsoring the following
Debian package:
aget - Multithreaded HTTP Download Accelerator
It could be downloaded in:
http://www.igloo.cl/~bruno/debian/aget_0.4-1_i386.deb
Other files here:
To my knowledge, Netfilter's ULOG target (and thus ipt_ULOG.h)
appeared in kernel version 2.4.18. On neither architecture, kernel
versions greater than 2.4.17 are available, so I guess using
ulog-acctd on those architectures would not make much sense, anyhow.
I don't think it is intended
On Fre, 2003-04-04 at 16:32, Hilko Bengen wrote:
I maintain the ulog-acctd package and have the problem that it does
not build on every architecture because a header file
(/usr/include/linux/netfilter/ipt_ULOG.h) is missing. At the moment,
the affected architectures are arm and m68k. This
1) simply resign it, and upload.
2) rebuild it from source each time
I always did the second, and when I had the time and energy, I also
checked the diff between his previous version, and the then-current one.
Is there any easy way to strip away the signature of the sponsoree
and sign it
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:05:09PM +0200, A Mennucc1 wrote:
I would like to sponsor a package of a friend
the first time, I (of course) check the package
(lintian, install it, etc etc)
but what about the next times? what is the best practice?
1) simply resign it, and upload.
2)
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 04:32:56PM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
I maintain the ulog-acctd package and have the problem that it does
not build on every architecture because a header file
(/usr/include/linux/netfilter/ipt_ULOG.h) is missing. At the moment,
the affected architectures are arm and
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:05:09PM +0200, A Mennucc1 wrote:
I would like to sponsor a package of a friend
the first time, I (of course) check the package
(lintian, install it, etc etc)
but what about the next times? what is the best practice?
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 04:32:56PM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
In previous versions of ulog-acctd, I solved the problem by shipping
ipt_ULOG.h in the .diff, but my AM Andrew Suffield told me that this
is an ugly hack -- and I really have to agree.
A slightly more elegant way is to bdep on
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 06:52:47PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 00:39:34 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:19:54PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
inside /org/bugs.debian.org/spool.
Would anything else
Dear Mentors,
I intend to apply for becoming a Debian Packet Maintainer for the packet
'dvdauthor'. To apply to the New Maintainer process it seems as if I now
need an existing Debian developer who agrees to be an advocate and
verifies my application so that I may proceed to the New Maintainer
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:18:04PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 06:52:47PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
Would anything else be there?
Bits and pieces of state. There are no hidden bugs, if that's what you
mean.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have created a package for kmess,
a KDE3-based MSN chat client
(see http://kmess.sourceforge.net).
kmess is a well-done and KDE3-based client for the famous
MSN chat network written in C++ by Mike K. Bennett. It includes
font support, emoticons
Excuse me, forgot to tell you to CC me; I'm not on the list.
Regards, Fredrik
Fredrik Liljegren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi. I'm quite far in the nm-process, just need to get my package up.
I've packaged Audio TagTool (formerly known as MP3 Tag Tool).
My packages are here:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 09:24:40AM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
Once I'm satisfied with the build, lintian/linda checks, and that the
package installs/deinstalls ok, etc., then I sign with debsign. I just
dropped a script into ~/bin/ that should be called with the .changes
file(s) as the
B. Douglas Hilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah, but I'm such an old fart... I actually used to run Debian 0.97
on my old 386 (and it was sooo cool). As far as Linux is concerned,
I have always used Debian and nothing else. For years and years I have
just been a Debian User -- now I want to
I am not a Debian Developer yet but I did package gnujaxp, a free
implementation of the jaxp api with a SAX2 and DOM Level2 free
implementation.
The announce of the package as already be done[1] on debian-java and
Mark Howard made some remarks[2]. Everything has been corrected[3] and
the package
On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 23:47, Rudy wrote:
i think he's missunderstanding the 'representation'
term and thinking as comercial distribution, which is not the case.
Oh, i'm sure he is.
Thanks for helping.
-- Jordi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I can complete the entire checklist except I do not have
an advocate. Last year I checked the box anyways and was
dropped from the list after 6 weeks or whatever it is.
I would really like to be a contributing member of Debian,
but it is the chicken and egg thing. I can't help until I
become a
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:50:14AM -0500, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
I would really like to be a contributing member of Debian,
but it is the chicken and egg thing. I can't help until I
become a member, and until I become a member I'm not that
enthusiastic.
It is not true that you can't help
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 06:52:47PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 00:39:34 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:19:54PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
Where might I get a copy of the bug database? Is there any way to search
the bug database by text?
Ralf Treinen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:50:14AM -0500, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
I would really like to be a contributing member of Debian,
but it is the chicken and egg thing. I can't help until I
become a member, and until I become a member I'm not that
enthusiastic.
It is not true
Nobody wants to do that.
Still, I am back on my must join Debian kick and I really intend
to join. It may take years, oh well. Instead of adopting a package
I have resurrected one:
http://www.gyrodynamic.net/debian/xdrum [nat'ted .. slow]
I took this package, see xdrum_1.5.tar.gz and built
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 06:34:37PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
Bits and pieces of state. There are no hidden bugs, if that's what you
mean.
Oooh, the irony. I've just this minute been poking around in the archived
bugs, and came across 20879.log
B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
I'd use my http://www.gyrodynamic.net/spacecommander_0.3.3-2.tgz
Space Commander program, but it is has languished for a very long
time. Poor old program. Nevertheless, if that is what it takes I
will ressurect it and hack in Text Elite or something.
Sorry, broken
[This is probably going to sound hypocritical coming from a DD, or
excessively harsh, but try and stick with me]
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
I would really like to be a contributing member of Debian,
but it is the chicken and egg thing. I can't help until I
become a member,
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 03:08:22AM -0500, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
Still, I am back on my must join Debian kick and I really intend
to join. It may take years, oh well. Instead of adopting a package
I have resurrected one:
http://www.gyrodynamic.net/debian/xdrum [nat'ted .. slow]
If
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 03:21:22AM -0500, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
I'd use my http://www.gyrodynamic.net/spacecommander_0.3.3-2.tgz
Space Commander program, but it is has languished for a very long
time. Poor old program. Nevertheless, if that is what it takes I
will
I am not a Debian Developer yet but I did package gnujaxp, a free
implementation of the jaxp api with a SAX2 and DOM Level2 free
implementation.
The announce of the package as already be done[1] on debian-java and
Mark Howard made some remarks[2]. Everything has been corrected[3] and
the package
I really could give a ratt's a$$ about a Debian email address, that is
the least of my concerns. Just what I don't need is another email address.
Still, I have been a staunch Debian advocate for over ten years, and I have
installed it for several friends of mine, including some pesky laptop
Yeah, my Netwinder is flaky, and it is NAT'ted to port 13808
because of Charter.Net blocking port 80. I used to have the
xdrum_1.7.orig.tar.gz online, but I wrote xdrum_1.7 and I just
made it a Debian native package, hence no need for the original.
If you look in the dir, xdrum_1.5.tar.gz was the
B. Douglas Hilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree. Thus the real answer to my query. This makes it very hard
to apply because you need an advocate before you even apply, so nobody
even knows you are alive. It would be nice if there was a pre-applicant
Well, basically you need to somehow
[Please don't send me private copies of replies to list mail - thanks.]
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:09:22AM -0500, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 03:08:22AM -0500, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
Still, I am back on my must join Debian kick and I really intend
to
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
I really could give a ratt's a$$ about a Debian email address, that is
the least of my concerns. Just what I don't need is another email address.
Well, that's a start. I was hard on the issue of the e-mail address because
it's an easy analogy...
B. Douglas Hilton (2003-04-04 04:55:35 -0500) :
[...]
I dunno. I remember submitting a bug report for Debian/Arm last year
because something trivial ( can't remember now ) was messed up. I
don't generally submit bug reports, because I generally don't have
any problems with Debian that I
Hello,
I maintain the ulog-acctd package and have the problem that it does
not build on every architecture because a header file
(/usr/include/linux/netfilter/ipt_ULOG.h) is missing. At the moment,
the affected architectures are arm and m68k. This file is supposed to
be part of libc6-dev and as I
hi
I would like to sponsor a package of a friend
the first time, I (of course) check the package
(lintian, install it, etc etc)
but what about the next times? what is the best practice?
1) simply resign it, and upload.
2) rebuild it from source each time
I would prefer the 1st , for
Hello:
I'm looking for someone who is interested in sponsoring the following
Debian package:
aget - Multithreaded HTTP Download Accelerator
It could be downloaded in:
http://www.igloo.cl/~bruno/debian/aget_0.4-1_i386.deb
Other files here:
To my knowledge, Netfilter's ULOG target (and thus ipt_ULOG.h)
appeared in kernel version 2.4.18. On neither architecture, kernel
versions greater than 2.4.17 are available, so I guess using
ulog-acctd on those architectures would not make much sense, anyhow.
I don't think it is intended
On Fre, 2003-04-04 at 16:32, Hilko Bengen wrote:
I maintain the ulog-acctd package and have the problem that it does
not build on every architecture because a header file
(/usr/include/linux/netfilter/ipt_ULOG.h) is missing. At the moment,
the affected architectures are arm and m68k. This
1) simply resign it, and upload.
2) rebuild it from source each time
I always did the second, and when I had the time and energy, I also
checked the diff between his previous version, and the then-current one.
Is there any easy way to strip away the signature of the sponsoree
and sign it
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:05:09PM +0200, A Mennucc1 wrote:
I would like to sponsor a package of a friend
the first time, I (of course) check the package
(lintian, install it, etc etc)
but what about the next times? what is the best practice?
1) simply resign it, and upload.
2)
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 04:32:56PM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
I maintain the ulog-acctd package and have the problem that it does
not build on every architecture because a header file
(/usr/include/linux/netfilter/ipt_ULOG.h) is missing. At the moment,
the affected architectures are arm and
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 04:32:56PM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
In previous versions of ulog-acctd, I solved the problem by shipping
ipt_ULOG.h in the .diff, but my AM Andrew Suffield told me that this
is an ugly hack -- and I really have to agree.
A slightly more elegant way is to bdep on
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 06:52:47PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 00:39:34 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:19:54PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
inside /org/bugs.debian.org/spool.
Would anything else
Dear Mentors,
I intend to apply for becoming a Debian Packet Maintainer for the packet
'dvdauthor'. To apply to the New Maintainer process it seems as if I now
need an existing Debian developer who agrees to be an advocate and
verifies my application so that I may proceed to the New Maintainer
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:18:04PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 06:52:47PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
Would anything else be there?
Bits and pieces of state. There are no hidden bugs, if that's what you
mean.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have created a package for kmess,
a KDE3-based MSN chat client
(see http://kmess.sourceforge.net).
kmess is a well-done and KDE3-based client for the famous
MSN chat network written in C++ by Mike K. Bennett. It includes
font support, emoticons
Excuse me, forgot to tell you to CC me; I'm not on the list.
Regards, Fredrik
Fredrik Liljegren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi. I'm quite far in the nm-process, just need to get my package up.
I've packaged Audio TagTool (formerly known as MP3 Tag Tool).
My packages are here:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 09:24:40AM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
Once I'm satisfied with the build, lintian/linda checks, and that the
package installs/deinstalls ok, etc., then I sign with debsign. I just
dropped a script into ~/bin/ that should be called with the .changes
file(s) as the
62 matches
Mail list logo
