Re: First steps in packaging

2003-04-18 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Pete Ryland wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:46:21AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, David Z Maze wrote: Your mailer doesn't have a reply to all button? Get a better one, Debian has lots. The problem we're discussing, though, is that reply to

Re: First steps in packaging

2003-04-18 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Bob Proulx wrote: Tony Maro wrote: Why do I feel like I opened a can of worms? It is that squirmy feeling in the gut. Like just before the alien claws its way out. Tony really should read the labels better. - Matt

Re: First steps in packaging

2003-04-18 Thread Thomas Wouters
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 01:54:59PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: Out of interest, are there any MUAs which have a separate reply to list function? Yes, Mutt. See the 'Mailing Lists' and 'Handling Mailing Lists' sections of its manual (/usr/share/doc/mutt/manual.txt.gz in its package.) --

Re: First steps in packaging

2003-04-18 Thread Bob Proulx
Matthew Palmer wrote: Out of interest, are there any MUAs which have a separate reply to list function? KDE's 'kmail' for those into GUIs to read text. But you have to configure the list address on a per folder basis. Bob pgpKg8pXDLrj4.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: First steps in packaging

2003-04-18 Thread Moray Allan
On Fri, 2003-04-18 at 09:56, Bob Proulx wrote: Matthew Palmer wrote: Out of interest, are there any MUAs which have a separate reply to list function? KDE's 'kmail' for those into GUIs to read text. But you have to configure the list address on a per folder basis. Evolution also has a

Free Ad Guru

2003-04-18 Thread Terry Alva
Over the past years online, I’ve learned something about e-commerce: You may have the best offer, without visitors nobody will ever know and it simply will not work for you. That’s why Stephan Ducharme’s course is THE only way to make it online if you are a regular person with no

forking processes

2003-04-18 Thread syuval
Hello, Several weeks ago I reported having difficulties debugging a program that forks itself using Anjuta. However, my most recent observations show that the program never really forks itself. The fork() function always returns a positive PID and skips the child process clause. Just to

Re: First steps in packaging

2003-04-18 Thread Pete Ryland
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 01:54:59PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Pete Ryland wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:46:21AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, David Z Maze wrote: Your mailer doesn't have a reply to all button? Get a better one, Debian

Re: forking processes

2003-04-18 Thread Pete Ryland
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 03:48:39PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: pid = fork(); //split execution if(pid == 0) //child process { printf(Entering child process!\n); exit(0); }

Replacing a package with a newer, renamed version of itself.

2003-04-18 Thread Paul Hampson
I'm currently playing with FreeRadius, which was in unstable as radiusd-freeradius but was removed due to a grave bug against it, which was only supposed to keep it out of testing. It never appeared in a stable Debian release, so the archive has forgotten all about it. The upstream CVS and