On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 14:42:48 +0900, Junichi Uekawa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lintian, however, can't know that this particular library usually is
preloaded, not linked to. Hence the override.
If its use is going to be something like that, please don't put it in
/usr/lib. That's what the lintian
Hi Matt.
Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
In the case of software for Palmpilots and whatnot, unless a DD has
compatible hardware, they can't test it. (Incidentally, if someone really
wants to get pose in, they can donate a Palm to me and I'll happily test and
sponsor).
POSE is an
* Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-07-29 01:31]:
You won't be approved with no package in the archive.
coughbullshitcough
It _is_ so.
Definitely.
If you want to join Debian as a package maintainer, there is clearly
no good reason for not having a package in the archive. Only
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:28:32AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
hi,
Try lintian -i. You've probably left Author(s): in there. As it is decidable
whether there's one or many copyright holders, you should either erase the (s) or
just remove parantheses, depending on what follows.
fixed,
so
Hi,
users working with Debian woody often do not look at archived bugs when
reporting bugs on a package. Therefore it is likely that bugs that have
long been fixed in unstable, but will never be in woody will be reported
multiple times again.
Therefore on [EMAIL PROTECTED] it was suggested to
On 2003-07-29, 01:35 GMT, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:20:29PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
I have created a package for vimoutliner. Is there anybody who would
like to sponsor me?
[...]
All relevant files are on
ftp://ftp.ceplovi.cz/data/www/ceplovi/matej/progs/debian/
I'd
On 29.07.03 15:20 Frank Küster wrote:
users working with Debian woody often do not look at archived bugs when
reporting bugs on a package. Therefore it is likely that bugs that have
long been fixed in unstable, but will never be in woody will be reported
multiple times again.
Therefore on [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I'm looking for a sponsor. I have the following package ready for examination:
POPFile is an email classification tool with a Naive Bayes classifier, a POP3 proxy
and a web interface. It runs on most platforms and with most email
Suppose there is a package foobar that depends on a library libfoo. AIUI,
whenever the SONAME changes, the library name should change, so I expect this
to evolve as libfoo1, libfoo2, etc. What are the proper control fields
(Depends, Conflicts, Replaces, Provides) for these packages? If I
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:06:38PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
Suppose there is a package foobar that depends on a library libfoo. AIUI,
whenever the SONAME changes, the library name should change, so I expect
this to evolve as libfoo1, libfoo2, etc. What are the proper control
fields
Andreas Metzler wrote:
Frank Kuster wrote:
users working with Debian woody often do not look at archived bugs when
reporting bugs on a package. Therefore it is likely that bugs that have
long been fixed in unstable, but will never be in woody will be reported
multiple times again.
I have
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
I am adopting wmakerconf and wmakerconf-data packages -- I've already
debianized the newest upstream versions (2.9 and 0.80.0 respectively) and
fixed a few outstanding bugs. Being a non-maintainer, I'll need a sponsor
-- would anyone like to volunteer?
i have
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 14:42:48 +0900, Junichi Uekawa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lintian, however, can't know that this particular library usually is
preloaded, not linked to. Hence the override.
If its use is going to be something like that, please don't put it in
/usr/lib. That's what the lintian
Hi Matt.
Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
In the case of software for Palmpilots and whatnot, unless a DD has
compatible hardware, they can't test it. (Incidentally, if someone really
wants to get pose in, they can donate a Palm to me and I'll happily test and
sponsor).
POSE is an
On 2003-07-29, 01:35 GMT, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:20:29PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
I have created a package for vimoutliner. Is there anybody who would
like to sponsor me?
[...]
All relevant files are on
ftp://ftp.ceplovi.cz/data/www/ceplovi/matej/progs/debian/
I'd
On 29.07.03 15:20 Frank Küster wrote:
users working with Debian woody often do not look at archived bugs when
reporting bugs on a package. Therefore it is likely that bugs that have
long been fixed in unstable, but will never be in woody will be reported
multiple times again.
Therefore on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I'm looking for a sponsor. I have the following package ready for
examination:
POPFile is an email classification tool with a Naive Bayes classifier, a POP3
proxy and a web interface. It runs on most platforms and with most email
Suppose there is a package foobar that depends on a library libfoo. AIUI,
whenever the SONAME changes, the library name should change, so I expect this
to evolve as libfoo1, libfoo2, etc. What are the proper control fields
(Depends, Conflicts, Replaces, Provides) for these packages? If I
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:06:38PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
Suppose there is a package foobar that depends on a library libfoo. AIUI,
whenever the SONAME changes, the library name should change, so I expect
this to evolve as libfoo1, libfoo2, etc. What are the proper control
fields
Andreas Metzler wrote:
Frank Kuster wrote:
users working with Debian woody often do not look at archived bugs when
reporting bugs on a package. Therefore it is likely that bugs that have
long been fixed in unstable, but will never be in woody will be reported
multiple times again.
I have
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
I am adopting wmakerconf and wmakerconf-data packages -- I've already
debianized the newest upstream versions (2.9 and 0.80.0 respectively) and
fixed a few outstanding bugs. Being a non-maintainer, I'll need a sponsor
-- would anyone like to volunteer?
i have
21 matches
Mail list logo
