Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi, I'm still looking for a sponsor for debix-imager.
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debix-imager
Debix-imager is a setuid binary that allows a user to create a
loopback file, format it with the filesystem
pbuilders a great tool for figuring out your build-dependencies.
basically if you haven't got them right it won't build :-)
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 01:23:29AM -0700, Chris Wesley wrote:
Thanks for the tip! I also have libgd2-xpm listed a build dep. I didn't
find a reverse dependency for it
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 05:20:46PM +0300, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
This is my third or fourth attempt to find a sponsor for the
python-albatross package. So far, I've been contacted by one developer
who was interested in sponsoring the package; he never replied to my
reply, however, so I assume
Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The real problem is the soname. I'm willing to change the soname to
libgnat-3.15p.so (removing the .1) to become more compatible with
ACT's GNAT, but does that violate the Debian Policy?
The users will receive annoying warnings from ldconfig, so this
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:11:52 -0300
Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Kemp wrote:
Unpacking the .orig.tar.gz only creates the directory of the
program, but without the debian/ directory. What do I have to do?
Unzip the 'program.diff.gz' file, and apply it
Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was searching for a package and I've found it. But it´s compiled for
Debian stable. I use Debian unstable and I would like to compile it
for my version of Debian.
How can I recompile it? I have those files:
program.diff.gz
program.dsc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Küster) schrieb:
and pbuilder has been failing to
build a sid chroot for a couple of days (because there is no
console-tools-libs in sid currently, it seems).
Forget that. pbuilder create fails, but upgrading from a woody-base.tgz
to a sid-base.tgz seems to work.
So
Hello,
We have a debian package for pyduali (Arabic Spellchecker) and we are looking
for someone to sponsor it. I have been told to ask here first, so here I am ;)
Here is the debian bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=nobug=202940
Regards,
Mohamemd Elzubeir
--
Hello,
I am seeking for a sponsor for arp-sk:
Package: arp-sk
Version: 0.0.15-1
Section: net
Priority: optional
Architecture: i386
License: GPL
Upstream Author: Frédéric Raynal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upstream web: http://www.arp-sk.org
Description: A swiss knife tool for ARP
Arp-sk is a tool that
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 02:58:33PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
i am seeking a sponsor for my [1]pgpdump (0.19-1) package.
pgpdump is a pgp packet visualizer, which is similar (but better) to
gpg's --list-packets command. sample output (dump of pgpdump's signed
.dsc file):
Old: Signature
Hi,
I have a package which has an init script that depends on beeing called
after /etc/rcS.d/S40hostname but before /etc/rcS.d/S40networking. No
problem, by lucky chance it's name is netenv...
Now I would like to make sure that the order of the scripts didn't
change in recent unstable. This is
Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You should bump Standards-Version to the most recent one (after
checking that no changes are necessay).
OK, will do. I was wondering where I could find a diff between
various Standards-Versions to check for
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Hi,
by the way, do you use debuild to build your package?
I'm using dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
That way Debian will do some more checks before and after build like
build dependencies and lintian runs. Lintian will catch a lot of
little mistakes one can make like
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 10:38:06AM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
Matthew Palmer wrote:
The easiest way for packages in the actual archive is to run 'apt-get
source package'. That'll download the sources and unpack them into
the current directory.
Ahh, this brings up a point that has bothered
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:16:31PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
thx to all for the responses. I'm slowly making progress here. Could
someone distinguish the configuration section and how that applies to
debian packages for me (the eternal newbie).
There are several configuration sections you
Colin Watson wrote:
That's correct except that you want non-free there, not free.
(Ever think you'd hear a Debian developer say that?)
would it be sacreligious to ask why sources are kept in non-free?
I found it easiest (years ago) to read the sources.list(5) man page and
learn how those
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Jason Thomas wrote:
you missing dev packages from the Build-Depends it needs to be as below:
Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), libgdk-pixbuf-dev, docbook-to-man
libgdk-libgdk-dev depends on the other things you need.
Thanks for the tip! I also have libgd2-xpm listed a
Hi.
Chris Wesley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Jason Thomas wrote:
libgdk-libgdk-dev depends on the other things you need.
Thanks for the tip! I also have libgd2-xpm listed a build dep. I didn't
find a reverse dependency for it from libgdk-pixbuf-dev's chain of
dependencies,
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 11:34, Celso Gonzlez wrote:
I have filled a ITP a few days ago and now i have a preliminary package
(lintian linda ok) available in
http://bulmalug.net/~perroverde/debian
The init script is kinda broken, see the attached patch.
--
Earthling Michel Dnzer \ Debian
Hi,
This is my third or fourth attempt to find a sponsor for the
python-albatross package. So far, I've been contacted by one developer
who was interested in sponsoring the package; he never replied to my
reply, however, so I assume he has other things to do at the moment.
Meanwhile, I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Goswin,
I can't sponsor you but I'm happy to help you with the:
* changelog
* man pages
I am not trying to sound rude but there are some obvious spelling errors in
them and I think I could help ;-)
DSL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
Hi, I'm still looking for a sponsor for debix-imager.
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debix-imager
Debix-imager is a setuid binary that allows a user to create a
loopback file, format it with the filesystem of his choice and install
the contents of a tar file or
I'm hoping that one (or more) of the DDs here might be willing to
sponsor one (or more) of the following packages. All of these have
either an RFP or ITP filed for them. I have updated the ITP entries
that where not filed by me and asked to assume the ITP, Evan (the
original ITP filer in both
Peter Nome [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On a woody base install, I'm getting lots of post-installation script errors, like
this:
# dpkg -i sed_3.02-8_i386.deb
(Reading database ... 6623 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace sed 3.02-8 (using sed_3.02-8_i386.deb)
Hello all,
I'm maintaining a rather small program, root-tail, which puts it's
binary in /usr/X11R6/bin/, for (AFAICT) no particularly good reason.
There is an Imakefile that is part of the original distribution, but
somewhere along the line, someone wrote a standard Makefile for it (this
program
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm updating the build depends in some of my packages, along with the
standards version to bring them current with debian policy, and I get
this error.
Now running lintian...
W: libwww-curl-perl source: newer-standards-version 3.6.0
Finished running
Duck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
P.S. : i don't c the point of creating/finalizing, could u add a full exemple
with explanations in ur pkg ?
Yep. I'm thinking about some more docs than the manpage.
The short version follows.
create creates a subdir with the loopback file, the mountpoint and a
Hi all,
I am preparing new Debian packages for CMS Midgard.
My idea is to let users manage with their databases and hosts
with debconf and dpkg instead of writing one config and postinst
for setup and updates and another one tools for managing existing
ones in a future. So simply I would like
should have added that I also tried the fakeroot /debian/rules binary to
build the .deb, but it just told me that it didn't find a file on a line
that didn't exist in my /rules file.
eric
Winger, Eric wrote:
thx to all for the responses. I'm slowly making progress here. Could
someone
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 03:42:40PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
I was searching for a package and I've found it. But it?s compiled for
Debian stable. I use Debian unstable and I would like to compile it for
my version of Debian.
How can I recompile it? I have those files:
Eric Winger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ahh, this brings up a point that has bothered me about debian. Well
actually in this case, two points.
* all the deb-src entries i tried to add to my sources.list give me
* errors when I try to get the source. What is the url for sources?
* This is my
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The users will receive annoying warnings from ldconfig, so this is not
an option.
I tried it on the binary distribution of GNAT 3.15p. I did not get
any warnings:
Hmm, I can't reproduce it right
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 11:53:27AM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
That's correct except that you want non-free there, not free.
(Ever think you'd hear a Debian developer say that?)
would it be sacreligious to ask why sources are kept in non-free?
I think one of us is
Matthew Palmer wrote:
The easiest way for packages in the actual archive is to run 'apt-get
source
package'. That'll download the sources and unpack them into the
current
directory.
Ahh, this brings up a point that has bothered me about debian. Well
actually in this case, two points.
*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Quack,
Some days ago i made a RFS for SLune, a 3D racing and car-crashing game.
Only two days after this RFS python started to migrate to 2.3, so my
packages are uninstallable due to missing dependancies, so i've got to
wait a bit before rebuilding
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:40:42PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
Any ideas? Or is the postinst.ex file correct, and i may be not writing
the script correctly. I just added:
cp myFile /hardcoded path/
./path/myFile (wishing to run that file)
.ex stands for example. remove the .ex.
I suggest
Re: RFS : Slune and dependencies [Duck [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at
06:36:53PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
My gnupg key has already been signed.
I can't find it on the keyservers.
Maybe you could also include your real name in your mails.
Christoph
--
Christoph Berg [EMAIL
Hi.
Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Sorry, I messed things up: This I had found out yet, by the same
way. However, /etc/init.d/hostname.sh is from sysvinit, and I couldn't
find the place where the rcS.d-link to hostname.sh is made, neiter in
sysvinit's postinst nor in debootstrap.
Hu?
$
I installed webmin via Apt and it's running on my system...but when I open
my browser to http://129.48.77.3:1 I get bad request. I also tried my
machine name, instead of the IP.
Any suggestions?
dweezil
_
MSN 8 with e-mail
On Sunday 10 August 2003 15:14, Stephen Gran wrote:
Any comments on this? Am I making wrong assumptions here? My
understanding is that one should avoid /usr/X11R6/bin when possible, and
that's what I'm trying to accomplish.
basically you are correct. Pretty much everything is dropped in
On Wed 14:06, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
If these prgrams are not intended to be called by users, they belong in
/usr/lib/PACKAGE, not /usr/bin.
This would be desireable, however they need to be in $PATH so that
they can be called by PVM. If I put them here I either need to hack the
program, or
Description: Parity Archive v2
This utility applies the data-recover capability concepts of RAID-like
systems to individual and multiple files. It is most commonly used in
the posting and recovery of multipart archives on Usenet.
.
It supports the 'Reed-Soloman Code' implementation that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 06 August 2003 08:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Küster)
wrote:
Sorry, I messed things up: This I had found out yet, by the same
way. However, /etc/init.d/hostname.sh is from sysvinit, and I
couldn't find the place where the rcS.d-link
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 03:11:53PM -0400, Deedra Waters wrote:
I'm updating the build depends in some of my packages, along with the
standards version to bring them current with debian policy, and I get
this error.
Now running lintian...
W: libwww-curl-perl source: newer-standards-version
Peter Nome [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On a woody base install, I'm getting lots of post-installation script errors, like
this:
# dpkg -i sed_3.02-8_i386.deb
(Reading database ... 6623 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace sed 3.02-8 (using sed_3.02-8_i386.deb)
ok, I've managed to make a .deb file a big ol tarball. Questions:
* I would like to test install this package but not go through the
apt-get stuff, because i believe it goes to sources.list etc. Is there a
simple way to simulate this load to see if my commands run successfully?
Or even load
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your shared library support is probably incompatible with ACT's. Do
you really want to enable it by default?
Well, yes, I would like to, especially since gnat 3.14p did, too.
Ah, let's keep the old
Hi.
Carlos Fuster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I've just adopted an orphaned package, anyone can explain me when does the
package change from the
# Orphaned packages list
to # Packages currently being adopted list.
After you retitle the apropriate bug. (Or if you do an upload, closing the bug
I've just adopted an orphaned package, anyone can explain me when does the
package change from the
# Orphaned packages list
to # Packages currently being adopted list.
I'm a little confused about the Debian NM system. I'm going to work on my
package, when that would be done, I'll have to ask
I've been able to build a package, install it, get a postinst script to
run properly. Now, I'm at the point in my little test where
understanding where everything goes during install is important.
I'm moving away from using New Deb Maintainer docs and trying to follow
advice given in this
On Sunday 10 August 2003 09:50 am, ivan onyadi [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ivan
onyadi) wrote:
First of all I want to send greetings to you all .Let me first introduce
myself to you I am a Ugandan by nationality a, a student of KIGEZI HIGH
SCHOOL ,P.O BOX 58 KABALE,UGANDA ,E.A. and a total orphan.My
Eric Winger wrote:
would it be sacreligious to ask why sources are kept in non-free?
You are asking an obvious question and the answer is the obvious one.
The sources are in non-free because they are not free. Look at the
copyrights of any of the packages in non-free and you will see that
they
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:40:42PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
I've modified the postinst.ex file, but my commands aren't being
executed. And the Debian New Maintainers' Guide says I shouldn't do this
(add to maintainer scripts) yet. So that tells me I should be putting my
configuration
you missing dev packages from the Build-Depends it needs to be as below:
Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), libgdk-pixbuf-dev, docbook-to-man
libgdk-libgdk-dev depends on the other things you need.
you probably also want to update your Standards-Version see
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 03:42:40PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
I was searching for a package and I've found it. But it´s compiled for
Debian stable. I use Debian unstable and I would like to compile it for
my version of Debian.
How can I recompile it? I have those files:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:36:52AM +0200, Carlos Fuster wrote:
I've just adopted an orphaned package, anyone can explain me when does the
package change from the
# Orphaned packages list
to # Packages currently being adopted list.
I'm a little confused about the Debian NM system.
I'm looking for a sponsor for a package I've been maintaining outside of
the distribution since Sept 2002. wmDrawer[1] is a WindowMaker dockapp
that provides a retractable button bar used to launch applications.
Maybe you've used it? Maybe you'd like to use it? I use it religiously,
and think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Coin,
First of all, these kind of question as nothing to do in here.
Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If u get a bad request it is probably because webmin is using a secure connection
by default.
So, try : https://129.48.77.3:1
Duck
-BEGIN PGP
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 03:42:40PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
I was searching for a package and I've found it. But it?s compiled for
Debian stable. I use Debian unstable and I would like to compile it for
my version of Debian.
How can I recompile it? I have those files:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:11:00AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
Make sure you have installed the build-essential meta-package, it will
download things the package maintainer has assumed you have.
then,
dpkg-source -x program.dsc
cd program-1.2.3
(All correct, apt-get source was covered
Ok, I've managed to create a .deb package, experimented with putting
things in the rules file, installed my package locally. Learned a little
about purge and kind of have the gist of what y'all have been trying to
pound into my head.
But now I've run into a problem. For my first package, which
Ok, I got a few more things understood including what directories get
built inside of debian, etc. So I think I understand better what is
being installed where, so again, disregard the last email.
I've gotten a package to correctly deliver a .bin to a folder
successfully run that on install.
oops, shouldn't have posted so soon. I found the dpkg -i .deb option.
I'll work through that. sorry
Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:16:31PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
thx to all for the responses. I'm slowly making progress here. Could
someone distinguish the configuration
Steve Kemp wrote:
Unpacking the .orig.tar.gz only creates the directory of the program,
but without the debian/ directory. What do I have to do?
Unzip the 'program.diff.gz' file, and apply it with patch. This will
create the debian/ directory.
If you've got this from a stable archive I'm
Hi, Josh Lauricha wrote:
Should I just write a Use foo not foo-pvm man page for them or use an
override or link to the correct programs to use? Not being a DD, I'm not
certain which would be desired.
If these prgrams are not intended to be called by users, they belong in
/usr/lib/PACKAGE, not
Hi people
I was searching for a package and I've found it. But it´s compiled for
Debian stable. I use Debian unstable and I would like to compile it for
my version of Debian.
How can I recompile it? I have those files:
program.diff.gz
program.dsc
program.changes
program.deb
program.orig.tar.gz
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Peter Nome [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On a woody base install, I'm getting lots of post-installation script errors, like
this:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/sed.prerm: line 9: 653 Segmentation fault install-info
--quiet --remove sed
/var/lib/dpkg/info/sed.postinst: line
Eric Winger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ok, I've managed to make a .deb file a big ol tarball. Questions:
* I thought that the .deb file would end up containing all of my
* files, but the only thing that could possible hold my source is the
* big tarball that dpkg-buildpackage built for me.
Hi,
by the way, do you use debuild to build your package?
That way Debian will do some more checks before and after build like
build dependencies and lintian runs. Lintian will catch a lot of
little mistakes one can make like having *.ex files still in the
package. Listen to it.
MfG
After e-mailing the current maintainer several times over the last
month, and recieving no reply I have cleaned up my package for the new
upstream version og HMMER. The packages are almost linda + lintian
clean, the only complaints are that the *-pvm programs (which aren't
used by the user, they
On Ter, 2003-08-12 at 14:38, Eric Winger wrote:
* all the deb-src entries i tried to add to my sources.list give me
errors when I try to get the source. What is the url for sources? This
is my latest attempt:
deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian testing main contrib free
My sources.list
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:40:42PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
Ok, I've managed to create a .deb package, experimented with putting
things in the rules file, installed my package locally. Learned a little
about purge and kind of have the gist of what y'all have been trying to
pound into my
Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your shared library support is probably incompatible with ACT's. Do
you really want to enable it by default?
Well, yes, I would like to, especially since gnat 3.14p did, too.
Ah, let's keep the old mistakes. 8-)
Could you shed some light on what
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:54:08PM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
I hope that I've selected the correct debian mailing list for this
question. But if not, I would appreciate if you could redirect properly.
Nope, this is the right spot.
My first steps are proving to be quite haltingly slow. I'm
i am seeking a sponsor for my [1]pgpdump (0.19-1) package.
pgpdump is a pgp packet visualizer, which is similar (but better) to
gpg's --list-packets command. sample output (dump of pgpdump's signed
.dsc file):
Old: Signature Packet(tag 2)(277 bytes)
Ver 3 - old
Hash material(5
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Dweeil Brock wrote:
I installed webmin via Apt and it's running on my system...but when I open
my browser to http://129.48.77.3:1 I get bad request. I also tried my
machine name, instead of the IP.
Any suggestions?
dweezil
Read the friendly documentation?
I'm looking for a sponsor for a package I've been maintaining outside of
the distribution since Sept 2002. wmDrawer[1] is a WindowMaker dockapp
that provides a retractable button bar used to launch applications.
Maybe you've used it? Maybe you'd like to use it? I use it religiously,
and think
you missing dev packages from the Build-Depends it needs to be as below:
Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), libgdk-pixbuf-dev, docbook-to-man
libgdk-libgdk-dev depends on the other things you need.
you probably also want to update your Standards-Version see
I've just adopted an orphaned package, anyone can explain me when does the
package change from the
# Orphaned packages list
to # Packages currently being adopted list.
I'm a little confused about the Debian NM system. I'm going to work on my
package, when that would be done, I'll have to ask
Hi.
Chris Wesley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Jason Thomas wrote:
libgdk-libgdk-dev depends on the other things you need.
Thanks for the tip! I also have libgd2-xpm listed a build dep. I didn't
find a reverse dependency for it from libgdk-pixbuf-dev's chain of
dependencies,
Hi.
Carlos Fuster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I've just adopted an orphaned package, anyone can explain me when does the
package change from the
# Orphaned packages list
to # Packages currently being adopted list.
After you retitle the apropriate bug. (Or if you do an upload, closing the bug
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:36:52AM +0200, Carlos Fuster wrote:
I've just adopted an orphaned package, anyone can explain me when does the
package change from the
# Orphaned packages list
to # Packages currently being adopted list.
I'm a little confused about the Debian NM system.
pbuilders a great tool for figuring out your build-dependencies.
basically if you haven't got them right it won't build :-)
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 01:23:29AM -0700, Chris Wesley wrote:
Thanks for the tip! I also have libgd2-xpm listed a build dep. I didn't
find a reverse dependency for it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Quack,
Some days ago i made a RFS for SLune, a 3D racing and car-crashing game.
Only two days after this RFS python started to migrate to 2.3, so my
packages are uninstallable due to missing dependancies, so i've got to
wait a bit before rebuilding
New on my web site (http://users.skynet.be/ludovic.brenta):
* gnat-3.15p-2 takes into account Florian's remarks, except for the soname
of the shared libraries. I explained the reason for this in a previous
post.
* gnat-glade-3.15p-1, the distributed systems annex for GNAT.
*
I'm hoping that one (or more) of the DDs here might be willing to
sponsor one (or more) of the following packages. All of these have
either an RFP or ITP filed for them. I have updated the ITP entries
that where not filed by me and asked to assume the ITP, Evan (the
original ITP filer in both
I'm looking for a sponsor for any one of three packages. I've requested a
sponsor for salonify several times in the past with no luck, so I thought
I'd try two new packages that perhaps will have broader appeal. They are
fairly simple programs and packages, and all pass linda and lintian. I
also
Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First, please note that Debian is the only distro that does not ship
shared libraries with the FSF variant of GNAT; all other distros agree
that shared libraries are a good thing.
In fact, the GNU Ada Environment specification I wrote strongly
I've only looked at jabber-jit, but I see a couple of problems. It includes a
copy of the jabber source in it. when it should use the jabber-dev package. I
went through this same problem building the old icq transport for jabber. It
seems upstream don't like to link outside the tarball.
and
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ludovic Brenta [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First, please note that Debian is the only distro that does not ship
shared libraries with the FSF variant of GNAT; all other distros agree
that shared libraries are a good thing.
In fact, the GNU Ada
I forgot to say another thing about the GNU Ada Environment
Specification.
While I can live with /usr/share/ada/adainclude and
/usr/lib/ada/adalib, I definitely disagree with putting the libraries
in /usr/lib/ada/adalib. The Debian Policy clearly states that both
static and shared libraries
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:06:58AM +1000, Jason Thomas wrote:
I've only looked at jabber-jit, but I see a couple of problems. It
includes a copy of the jabber source in it. when it should use the
jabber-dev package. I went through this same problem building the
old icq transport for jabber.
Folks,
I have packaged ASIS for GNAT 3.15p for Debian. Unfortunately, I've
already filled my private web site with Ada stuff and so I cannot
upload ASIS to it.
If someone is interested, please reply and I'll send the .debs to you
for review. Here is the list of files:
7273 2003-08-15
93 matches
Mail list logo
