Hi,
I went through the RC bug list and collected Bugs with trivial patches
and sorted them a bit. They realy don't need much work so if you have
a minute pick one. If you want to NMU any of them check the
then currently claimed bugs (url under claimed bugs).
Changes (~24h): pending (-2),
Goswin von Brederlow (2003-08-24 12:42:35 +0200) :
By they way:
How do you claim a bug? How does/Can a non DD claim bugs?
Read aj's message tto debian-devel-announce/No.
#196450 simplecdrx: FTBFS with g++-3.3: Missing cassert include
Done already.
#197214 libggi: FTBFS with gcc-3.3: Uses
Roland Mas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow (2003-08-24 12:42:35 +0200) :
By they way:
How do you claim a bug? How does/Can a non DD claim bugs?
Read aj's message tto debian-devel-announce/No.
If that list would let anyone subscribe. Something is screwed there.
#196450
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 24 August 2003 14:28, Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roland Mas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Read aj's message tto debian-devel-announce/No.
If that list would let anyone subscribe. Something is screwed there.
The post is
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Roland Mas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks again for the email, but please refresh the claims page before
next one :-)
I would need a parser for the claims page. Instead of writing that I
installed debbugs and are
Paul Cupis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 24 August 2003 14:28, Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roland Mas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Read aj's message tto debian-devel-announce/No.
If that list would let anyone subscribe. Something is screwed there.
The post is
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Roland Mas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks again for the email, but please refresh the claims page before
next one :-)
I would need a parser for the claims page. Instead of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When running lintian, I always get the following warning:
W: atleto: postrm-unsafe-ldconfig
N:
N: The postrm script calls ldconfig unsafely. The postrm must only call
N: ldconfig when given the argument remove.
N:
N: Refer to Policy Manual,
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 05:26:32PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[Please don't send me private copies of list mail.]
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I would need a parser for the claims page. Instead of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dominik Stadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When running lintian, I always get the following warning:
W: atleto: postrm-unsafe-ldconfig
N:
N: The postrm script calls ldconfig unsafely. The postrm must only call
N: ldconfig when given the
Hi
I had a few questions about how to package a program that needs a new
version of gcc, but links to libraries compiled with the an old version
of gcc.
I have gcc 2.95.3 and gcc 3.3.1 installed. My program won't compile
with gcc 2.95.3, so I have been using 3.3.1. However it links against
Hi,
I went through the RC bug list and collected Bugs with trivial patches
and sorted them a bit. They realy don't need much work so if you have
a minute pick one. If you want to NMU any of them check the
then currently claimed bugs (url under claimed bugs).
Changes (~24h): pending (-2),
Goswin von Brederlow (2003-08-24 12:42:35 +0200) :
By they way:
How do you claim a bug? How does/Can a non DD claim bugs?
Read aj's message tto debian-devel-announce/No.
#196450 simplecdrx: FTBFS with g++-3.3: Missing cassert include
Done already.
#197214 libggi: FTBFS with gcc-3.3: Uses
Roland Mas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow (2003-08-24 12:42:35 +0200) :
By they way:
How do you claim a bug? How does/Can a non DD claim bugs?
Read aj's message tto debian-devel-announce/No.
If that list would let anyone subscribe. Something is screwed there.
#196450
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 24 August 2003 14:28, Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roland Mas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Read aj's message tto debian-devel-announce/No.
If that list would let anyone subscribe. Something is screwed there.
The post is
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Roland Mas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks again for the email, but please refresh the claims page before
next one :-)
I would need a parser for the claims page. Instead of writing that I
installed debbugs and are
Paul Cupis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 24 August 2003 14:28, Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roland Mas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Read aj's message tto debian-devel-announce/No.
If that list would let anyone subscribe. Something is screwed there.
The post is
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Roland Mas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks again for the email, but please refresh the claims page before
next one :-)
I would need a parser for the claims page. Instead of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When running lintian, I always get the following warning:
W: atleto: postrm-unsafe-ldconfig
N:
N: The postrm script calls ldconfig unsafely. The postrm must only call
N: ldconfig when given the argument remove.
N:
N: Refer to Policy Manual,
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 05:26:32PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[Please don't send me private copies of list mail.]
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I would need a parser for the claims page. Instead of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dominik Stadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When running lintian, I always get the following warning:
W: atleto: postrm-unsafe-ldconfig
N:
N: The postrm script calls ldconfig unsafely. The postrm must only call
N: ldconfig when given the
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 06:32:14PM +0200, Dominik Stadler wrote:
W: atleto: postrm-unsafe-ldconfig
N:
N: The postrm script calls ldconfig unsafely. The postrm must only call
N: ldconfig when given the argument remove.
N:
N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 9.1.1 for details.
N:
This
Searching the mailing lists, oddly shows up nothing. I think the debian
mailing list search page needs some fixing.
I'm actually using gtkmm1.2 not 2.0 so there is no c102 version. I
guess I will send an e-mail to the maintaner and ask.
Which leaves me one big question. How do I force my
David Meggy wrote:
Searching the mailing lists, oddly shows up nothing. I think the debian
mailing list search page needs some fixing.
I think this was in debian-devel. Since I had the page up in my
browser when I read your message here it is.
24 matches
Mail list logo
