Greetings,
I have a package that I have made a while back, which a lot of friends really
find usefull. Essentially, it's a script that calls combinations of APT options
and deborphan, to keep a system running Testing up-to-date, but cruft-free.
Given the great feedback I've received from people
Hi,
I'm the mantainer of phpldapadmin, a web-based tool for managing ldap
servers. I'm not (yet!) an official Debian developer, so I asked for a
sponsor. He checked my package and uploaded in the unstable debian
archive about ten days ago...
Here my questions:
- how long takes the
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 08:59:32AM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
Hi,
I'm the mantainer of phpldapadmin, a web-based tool for managing ldap
servers. I'm not (yet!) an official Debian developer, so I asked for a
sponsor. He checked my package and uploaded in the unstable debian
archive
The package is here..
http://funkyware.konflux.at/debian/pool/u/upgrade-system/
..and the said utility script looks like this:
source /etc/upgrade-system.conf
echo Updating available package lists...
apt-get -q=2 update
echo -e \nUpgrading installed
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 09.52, Jarno Elonen wrote:
echo -e \nCleaning APT cache...
apt-get clean
Isn't there an APT option that can be put in apt.conf.d that does the
same?
IMVHO as IANADD, this may find a place in the deborphan package. Or
perhaps in some script collection package like
On 2004-05-19 Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm the mantainer of phpldapadmin, a web-based tool for managing ldap
servers. I'm not (yet!) an official Debian developer, so I asked for a
sponsor. He checked my package and uploaded in the unstable debian
archive about ten days
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 08:59:32AM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
Hi,
I'm the mantainer of phpldapadmin, a web-based tool for managing ldap
servers. I'm not (yet!) an official Debian developer, so I asked for a
sponsor. He checked my package and uploaded in the unstable debian
archive
Jarno Elonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The package is here..
http://funkyware.konflux.at/debian/pool/u/upgrade-system/
..and the said utility script looks like this:
source /etc/upgrade-system.conf
echo Updating available package lists...
apt-get
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Jarno Elonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The package is here..
http://funkyware.konflux.at/debian/pool/u/upgrade-system/
..and the said utility script looks like this:
source
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 07:53:46AM -0400, James Damour wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 09:03, Steven Augart wrote:
As you probably know, when a shell sees that it is running a setuid or
setgid shell script, it detects this because the euid and ruid or egid
and rgid are different. It fixes
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
- A new minor upstream version is available for the package, my sponsor
told me it is better to wait the package enters in unstable before
send the new version, because every upload before this happens reset
the timer and I have to wait more time to see
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 07:53:46AM -0400, James Damour wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 09:03, Steven Augart wrote:
As you probably know, when a shell sees that it is running a setuid or
setgid shell script, it detects this because the euid and
--
Jonathan Crockett
Network Engineer
Midcontinent Communications
good luck
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Jonathan Crockett wrote:
--
Jonathan Crockett
Network Engineer
Midcontinent Communications
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- jc
Hi,
I'm the mantainer of phpldapadmin, a web-based tool for managing ldap
servers. I'm not (yet!) an official Debian developer, so I asked for a
sponsor. He checked my package and uploaded in the unstable debian
archive about ten days ago...
Here my questions:
- how long
On (19/05/04 15:54), Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 07:53:46AM -0400, James Damour wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 09:03, Steven Augart wrote:
As you probably know, when a shell sees that it is running a setuid or
First, a retraction:
James Damour wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 09:03, Steven Augart wrote:
As you probably know, when a shell sees that it is running a setuid or
setgid shell script, it detects this because the euid and ruid or egid
and rgid are different. It fixes this by setting the euid
Grzegorz B. Prokopski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On (19/05/04 15:54), Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 07:53:46AM -0400, James Damour wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 09:03, Steven Augart wrote:
As you probably know, when a
Now I know why I had such trouble getting setuid programs to work
on Linux.
My understanding of Greg and Jeroen's explanations is that the kernel
ignores whether an interpreted program has the setuid bit set -- it
just executes the interpreter given after the #!, passing the full
pathname
Greetings,
I have a package that I have made a while back, which a lot of friends really
find usefull. Essentially, it's a script that calls combinations of APT options
and deborphan, to keep a system running Testing up-to-date, but cruft-free.
Given the great feedback I've received from people
Hi,
I'm the mantainer of phpldapadmin, a web-based tool for managing ldap
servers. I'm not (yet!) an official Debian developer, so I asked for a
sponsor. He checked my package and uploaded in the unstable debian
archive about ten days ago...
Here my questions:
- how long takes the
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 08:59:32AM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
Hi,
I'm the mantainer of phpldapadmin, a web-based tool for managing ldap
servers. I'm not (yet!) an official Debian developer, so I asked for a
sponsor. He checked my package and uploaded in the unstable debian
archive
The package is here..
http://funkyware.konflux.at/debian/pool/u/upgrade-system/
..and the said utility script looks like this:
source /etc/upgrade-system.conf
echo Updating available package lists...
apt-get -q=2 update
echo -e \nUpgrading installed
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 09.52, Jarno Elonen wrote:
echo -e \nCleaning APT cache...
apt-get clean
Isn't there an APT option that can be put in apt.conf.d that does the
same?
IMVHO as IANADD, this may find a place in the deborphan package. Or
perhaps in some script collection package like
On 2004-05-19 Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm the mantainer of phpldapadmin, a web-based tool for managing ldap
servers. I'm not (yet!) an official Debian developer, so I asked for a
sponsor. He checked my package and uploaded in the unstable debian
archive about ten days
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 08:59:32AM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
Hi,
I'm the mantainer of phpldapadmin, a web-based tool for managing ldap
servers. I'm not (yet!) an official Debian developer, so I asked for a
sponsor. He checked my package and uploaded in the unstable debian
archive
Jarno Elonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The package is here..
http://funkyware.konflux.at/debian/pool/u/upgrade-system/
..and the said utility script looks like this:
source /etc/upgrade-system.conf
echo Updating available package lists...
apt-get
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Jarno Elonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The package is here..
http://funkyware.konflux.at/debian/pool/u/upgrade-system/
..and the said utility script looks like this:
source
Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
echo -e \nUpgrading installed packages...
apt-get $UPGRADEOPTS
This might fail if the cache is filled and /var nearly full.
Not at all, since previous runs of this script would have cleaned
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 07:53:46AM -0400, James Damour wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 09:03, Steven Augart wrote:
As you probably know, when a shell sees that it is running a setuid or
setgid shell script, it detects this because the euid and
--
Jonathan Crockett
Network Engineer
Midcontinent Communications
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
good luck
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Jonathan Crockett wrote:
--
Jonathan Crockett
Network Engineer
Midcontinent Communications
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- jc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 07:53:46AM -0400, James Damour wrote:
In this case, this setgid-wrapper concept would work for *all* Java
applications. I'm still not sure if it will work for shell driven apps
in general, but it sounds reasonable. Security may be a concern, but I
believe that a
On (19/05/04 15:54), Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 07:53:46AM -0400, James Damour wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 09:03, Steven Augart wrote:
As you probably know, when a shell sees that it is running a setuid or
On (19/05/04 13:14), Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
On (19/05/04 15:54), Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Could it be you mean bash droping the setuid/setgid bits when it is
set setuid/setgid? Thats a bash speciality preventing hackers to
setuid/gid bash as so many rootkits have done in the past.
First, a retraction:
James Damour wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 09:03, Steven Augart wrote:
As you probably know, when a shell sees that it is running a setuid or
setgid shell script, it detects this because the euid and ruid or egid
and rgid are different. It fixes this by setting the euid to
Now I know why I had such trouble getting setuid programs to work
on Linux.
My understanding of Greg and Jeroen's explanations is that the kernel
ignores whether an interpreted program has the setuid bit set -- it
just executes the interpreter given after the #!, passing the full
pathname
Your message entitled D.writeln(c has been received. It is being tracked under
Trouble Ticket ID : 1104639.
Thank You for contacting Net Access Corporation
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steven Augart wrote:
First, a retraction:
James Damour wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 09:03, Steven Augart wrote:
As you probably know, when a shell sees that it is running a setuid or
setgid shell script, it detects this because the euid and ruid or egid
and rgid are different. It fixes
39 matches
Mail list logo
