-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Majer wrote:
Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
Hi folks, I have a noob question for you. I maintain the Cogito package
(my first), and it wants to install an executable as /usr/bin/git. The
GNU Interactive Tools package (git) also wants to
Greetings,
I greatly appreciate to adopt the package debconf: Debian configuration
management system for package maintenance or in co-maintainenance
together with Joey Hess:
oldstable (admin): 1.0.32
Binary packages: debconf, debconf-doc, debconf-utils
stable (admin): 1.4.30.13
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:25:55AM +0200, Christian A. David wrote:
Greetings,
I greatly appreciate to adopt the package debconf: Debian configuration
management system for package maintenance or in co-maintainenance
together with Joey Hess:
Maybe cc Joey Hess and the wnpp bug also with
Op do, 09-06-2005 te 23:10 +0200, schreef Sren Hansen:
Sponsor still needed, and all the issues mentioned by Sven should be
taken care of. New packages uploaded.
Hi,
I can't sponser you because I am not an DD (yet), but your package
looked interesting so I tried to install. I had some problems
fre, 10 06 2005 kl. 13:04 +0200, skrev Arjan Oosting:
Sponsor still needed, and all the issues mentioned by Sven should be
taken care of. New packages uploaded
I can't sponser you because I am not an DD (yet), but your package
looked interesting so I tried to install. I had some problems
Hi,
One final thing i forgot in my previous message. Em-panel-applet depends
on DBUS notifications send by the new-mail-plugin from evolution. So you
should also mention that the new-mail-plugin should be enabled and maybe
also Recommend: evolution-plugins (which could replace the current
Op vr, 10-06-2005 te 13:29 +0200, schreef Arjan Oosting:
Hi,
One final thing i forgot in my previous message. Em-panel-applet depends
on DBUS notifications send by the new-mail-plugin from evolution. So you
should also mention that the new-mail-plugin should be enabled and maybe
also
Op vr, 10-06-2005 te 13:27 +0200, schreef Sren Hansen:
I'm not sure how it works, when you actually upload stuff to Debian.
Don't you just upload the source packages, and then the build servers
build it for the different archs?
Well this depends :) If you are an Debian developer you upload an
Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 07:50:39PM -0400, Ricardo Yanez wrote:
Kevin McCarty and I have packaged the software called ROOT, widely used
in particle and nuclear physics for the numerical analysis of large data
sets. Currently, ROOT cannot go into Debian or non-free
Sebastian Kuzminsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The cogito /usr/bin/git is a tiny little helper script hardly worth its
inode, but it's in the upstream package and I dont want to remove it or
rename it.
As others have asked, why not? Does anything actually rely on the
script existing by that
The attachment(s) that you sent with the following mail
was deleted by VisNetic MailScan (not delivered to the recipient)
==
The Mail came from: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
The Mail recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject of the
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 13:04 +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
I guess you build it on a Ubuntu system? Maybe next time you could built
them in a Debian unstable chroot (with pbuilder). This way you also
make sure it compiles and is installable on a Debian system.
Any hints how to do this on an
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 01:59:04AM +1000, John Skaller wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 13:04 +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
I guess you build it on a Ubuntu system? Maybe next time you could built
them in a Debian unstable chroot (with pbuilder). This way you also
make sure it compiles and is
Name: libxvmcw
Homepage: http://sourceforge.net/projects/unichrome
License: GPL
Short Description: XvMC wrapper library.
Long Description: (from the readme)
This Wrapper is a convenience lib intended for packagers and XvMC
player developers. It dlopens an XvMC lib at runtime, and therefore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron M. Ucko) wrote:
The cogito /usr/bin/git is a tiny little helper script hardly worth its
inode, but it's in the upstream package and I dont want to remove it or
rename it.
As others have asked, why not? Does anything actually rely on the
script existing by that
Sebastian Kuzminsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm, given that git-from-cogito seems to have a fatal flaw (it doesnt
shift the script name out of the arguments list), I'm guessing it's
not widely used. I'll request that the upstream people remove it from
the distribution.
Oops, my fingers are
Hi,
The upstream Cogito people have added a /usr/bin/git executable (over
my objections) which conflicts with GNU Interactive Tools' /usr/bin/git.
Their argument is that GNU Interactive Tools is obsoleted by mc and
should just go away.
Should I just make my cogito package Conflict with
17 matches
Mail list logo
