Not able to understand debian-policy 8.1.1

2005-07-13 Thread kamaraju kusumanchi
In http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html , In section 8.1.1, in the second paragraph it says The package must call |ldconfig| in the |postinst| script if the first argument is configure; . The package should call |ldconfig| in the |postrm| script if the first

Re: Not able to understand debian-policy 8.1.1

2005-07-13 Thread Nigel Jones
On 13/07/05, kamaraju kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html , In section 8.1.1, in the second paragraph it says The package must call |ldconfig| in the |postinst| script if the first argument is configure; . The package

Re: Not able to understand debian-policy 8.1.1

2005-07-13 Thread Ben Finney
On 13-Jul-2005, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: In http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html , In section 8.1.1, in the second paragraph it says The package must call |ldconfig| in the |postinst| script if the first argument is configure; . The package should call

RFS: ecasound: Re: Bug#317194: ecasound update is pending g++ 4.0 transition

2005-07-13 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, I'm looking for someone who can upload ecasound for me. http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/tmp/20050713/ It fixes a uninstallable error. regards, junichi At Wed, 13 Jul 2005 02:02:43 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: gcc 4.0 is already in a usable state and is the default compiler

Re: Not able to understand debian-policy 8.1.1

2005-07-13 Thread kamaraju kusumanchi
Ben Finney wrote: On 13-Jul-2005, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: In http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html , In section 8.1.1, in the second paragraph it says The package must call |ldconfig| in the |postinst| script if the first argument is configure; . The

A question regarding unofficial packages (for Xen)

2005-07-13 Thread Yvette Chanco
Apologies if the answer to this is obvious, or if this is the wrong list. My question involves Xen which has been maintained through 2.0.5-3 (in experimental) by Adam Heath. I am not in any way trying to highjack this package - I was very happy with the original. However, since the release of Xen

FROM ADDRESS NOT FOUND

2005-07-13 Thread mailadmin
This mailing list does not accept messages from email addresses that are not on the mailing list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A question regarding unofficial packages (for Xen)

2005-07-13 Thread Craig Small
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 03:16:45AM -0500, Yvette Chanco wrote: Apologies if the answer to this is obvious, or if this is the wrong list. My question involves Xen which has been maintained through 2.0.5-3 (in experimental) by Adam Heath. I am not in any way trying to highjack this package - I

RFS: fortunes-ru - Russian fortune cookies

2005-07-13 Thread Basil Shubin
Hi, I'm seeking a sponsor for fortunes-ru * Package name: fortunes-ru Version : 1.33 Upstream Author : Pavel Maryanov aka Acid Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://freshmeat.net/projects/fortune-mod-ru/ * License : GPL Description : Russian fortune

Re: RFS: fortunes-ru - Russian fortune cookies

2005-07-13 Thread Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 09:46:10PM +0700, Basil Shubin wrote: A collection of Russian fortune cookies, from various sources. his package can be replacement for or an addition to the fortunes package to let fortune speak Russian. I have packaged fortunes-ru, so long awaited by russian

Re: A question regarding unofficial packages (for Xen)

2005-07-13 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, On Wed, Jul 13, 2005, Yvette Chanco wrote: The only things I could think to do were keep working on my packages to make them clean and conform with policy, and post to this list to ask for advice. Does anybody have thoughts on what the best course of action is? That's really

Re: A question regarding unofficial packages (for Xen)

2005-07-13 Thread Yvette Chanco
On 7/13/05, Craig Small [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's really going to come down to what Adam thinks he can do. If he believes he needs help then you could suggest that he sponsors you (or a bunch of you). I do know there is a lot of interest in Xen. Adam is [EMAIL PROTECTED], did you try

Re: A question regarding unofficial packages (for Xen)

2005-07-13 Thread Yvette Chanco
On 7/13/05, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's really nice. You'll find some of the information on http://www.debian.org/devel/ more useful than the policy itself. I've read that better integration in make-kpkg was on the TODO, but make-kpkg on Xen sources worked for me, so I

No need to pay more - cheapest OEM online.

2005-07-13 Thread Joe
OS-Adobe-Macromedia etc All under $15-$99 CDS http://gnbah.i74f3z0bxs0pfji.barwaldgakg.info It's not the questions that get us in trouble. It's the answers. There is nothing like good food, good wine, and a bad girl. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

zoo: directory traversal security bug

2005-07-13 Thread Jose Carlos do Nascimento
Hi, All I'm mantainer of zoo package and I need help to solve this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=309594 I dont know C :( I would be very grateful if someone could help me. Thanks Jose Carlos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: zoo: directory traversal security bug

2005-07-13 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote: I'm mantainer of zoo package and I need help to solve this bug: ... I dont know C :( Is it just me or does this sound wrong? Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: zoo: directory traversal security bug

2005-07-13 Thread Jose Carlos do Nascimento
Hi, Thomas Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote: I'm mantainer of zoo package and I need help to solve this bug: I adopted this package some days ago :) I know to make a package .deb,, but I am not a C developer :) I tried to find one solution in zoo packages from others distribs, but

Re: how use dpatch for binary files ?

2005-07-13 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, Im thinking use uuencode and uudecode to solve this problem, but I would like to know if have other option to solve it. It is the limitation of dpkg-source. That seems to be the right solution for the time being. regards, junichi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: zoo: directory traversal security bug

2005-07-13 Thread Ganesan Rajagopal
Thomas == Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote: I'm mantainer of zoo package and I need help to solve this bug: ... I dont know C :( Is it just me or does this sound wrong? Not to me. I don't think it's a requirement to know C to maintain a package.

ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib error

2005-07-13 Thread kamaraju kusumanchi
I am trying to package fortranposix library. I produced some debian packages but I am not satisfied with their quality. For example, when I do $lintian -i libfortranposix0_0.1-1_i386.deb E: libfortranposix0: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib usr/lib/libfortranposix.so.0

Re: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib error

2005-07-13 Thread kamaraju kusumanchi
skaller wrote: On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 01:25 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: I am trying to package fortranposix library. I produced some debian packages but I am not satisfied with their quality. For example, when I do $lintian -i libfortranposix0_0.1-1_i386.deb E: libfortranposix0:

Re: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib error

2005-07-13 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 01:53 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: section 8.1 of debian-policy states that [sic]The run-time library package should include the symbolic link that |ldconfig| would create for the shared libraries. [sic] Does not this mean that ldconfig creates the symbolic link