On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:14:28PM -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
Kevin B. McCarty wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also (and this is quite a dumb question), when the end user wants to use
the debug package, what magical options does s/he give to gdb when
running a program so that gdb knows
Hi all,
I'm trying to get synfig (http://www.synfig.com) into debian, and there
is one last issue before I start harassing my sponsors/co-maintainers to
upload it.
Lintian complains about shlib-with-non-pic-code on one of the plugins,
and the main lib. I think the problem with the plugin is that
Hello P-A,
I'm trying to package arpoison 0.6 (arpoison.sf.net). So far, so good:
everything seems to work. I uploaded it to mentors.debian.net. If any of you
would like to have a look ..
I have, and here are some results.
* First of all, the package is signed but your key is not signed by
Hello Martin,
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 23:54 +, Martin Meredith wrote:
Would still love to get this sponsored - Anyone interested ? (forwarding to
pkg-games-devel too)
AABrowse is a Linux-native server browser/query/game-launch
tool for America's Army (http://www.americasarmy.com/).
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 23:49:42 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote
./debian/copyrights
Please include the years during which the copyright holder made
significant code modifications
Done!
./debian/control
Don't pluralize information
Done!
This could be priority: extra, unless
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 05:28:15PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
I'm trying to get synfig (http://www.synfig.com) into debian, and there
is one last issue before I start harassing my sponsors/co-maintainers to
upload it.
Lintian complains about shlib-with-non-pic-code on one of the plugins,
and
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.3.7
Severity: minor
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:23:24PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 23:49:42 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote
This could be priority: extra, unless something not in extra will
depend on it.
Well ,according to
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 05:07 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
I've never understood why people feel the need to bundle libltdl in their
sources instead of just telling users to download install it as a
build-dependency. shrug
I can't say for that particular library, but in general there
is a
Hum..
I'm afraid, I don't understand your point..
Actually, the watch file uses the format:
http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php?project=getid3 getid3-(1\.\d*\.\d*)\.zip
which is the one refered in your message..
A pointer to where I found this method:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:07:09 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote
./debian/watch
Please consider using the sf.net format now documented.
Done!
Nope. Check uscan.1; the sf.net format actually uses http://sf.net/,
and is rewritten internally by uscan. I don't know if your method
would
Hum..
I'm afraid, I don't understand your point..
Actually, the watch file uses the format:
http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php?project=getid3 getid3-(1\.\d*\.\d*)\.zip
which is the one refered in your message..
A pointer to where I found this method:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 05:32:36PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
Hum..
I'm afraid, I don't understand your point..
Actually, the watch file uses the format:
http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php?project=getid3 getid3-(1\.\d*\.\d*)\.zip
which is the one refered in your message..
On re-reading this message, it seems to have a harsh tone. Sorry about that,
that was not my intention. Also I don't want to start a flame-war or
anything, but I do want either me or the others (whoever that includes)
convinced about the proper way of packaging programs with autotools. Or else
On Fri, 03 Feb 2006, Bas Wijnen wrote:
On re-reading this message, it seems to have a harsh tone. Sorry about that,
that was not my intention. Also I don't want to start a flame-war or
anything, but I do want either me or the others (whoever that includes)
Ah, no I didn't take that as harsh,
14 matches
Mail list logo
