Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 10:02:06PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote:
Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question is, how do I solve this? Should I forcefully remove
the conffile before calling update-rc.d? It feels really bad to
remove files from
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
- if it is changed, either keep it and insert a comment at its
beginning that it is unused, or move/rename it. In all cases where
the file's presence could have a bad effect, I renamed or moved
it.
Just a
PyKaraoke is a free karaoke player written in Python. You can use it to play
your collection of CDG, MIDI and MPEG karaoke songs. Upstream homepage is at
http://www.kibosh.org/pykaraoke/
PyKaraoke is actually a GUI frontend which controls three libraries, pycdg for
CDG files, pykar for MIDI/KAR
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a word of caution here: If the administrator has modified the
file, you should not rename or move it, as they may know better
than you what they're doing. A proper course of action would be
warning them,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all!
As some of you may already know from -devel, I've adopted opendchub
recently from Grzegorz Prokopski (gadek), and now I've finished
packaging the new version which fixes a few bugs and updates the
autotools stuff.
As usual, here's the
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. The problem is that it's not always easy to know if the file
will no longer be read at all; you can't assume that the administrator
has left in place your default configuration system.
Of course the maintainer should know their package. If the
Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PyKaraoke is a free karaoke player written in Python.
If that's meant to be the start of the long description, please drop the
written in Python, because it's not interesting, and for those who
want to know that nevertheless, the information is in the
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. The problem is that it's not always easy to know if the file
will no longer be read at all; you can't assume that the administrator
has left in place your default configuration system.
Of course the
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. The problem is that it's not always easy to know if the file
will no longer be read at all; you can't assume that the administrator
has left in place your
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 11:35:01AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006, Frank K?ster wrote:
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. The problem is that it's not always easy to know if the file
will no longer be read at all; you can't assume that the administrator
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. The problem is that it's not always easy to know if the file
will no longer be read at all; you can't assume that the
Stan Vasilyev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a situation with a Debian package xdialog:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xdialog.html
The upstream author, Thierry Godefroy [EMAIL PROTECTED], insists on keeping
the debian changes inside the upstream tarball, orig.tar.gz. This
complicates
--- Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only the frontend seems to be using libwxgtk-python, so I'm planning to
separate it into two different binary packages, one with the command line
programs (and less dependencies, no wx) and another one, depending on it,
with
the frontend.
I've
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 13:15, Jari Aalto wrote:
Is the upstream using a VCS? (Version control software)?
1) If he is, can he grant you a direct write access. That would be the
easiest.
2) Can he be persuaded into using distributed SCM[1]? That way both of
you can synchronize at
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 12:28:39AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006, Frank K?ster wrote:
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a word of caution here: If the administrator has modified the
file, you should not rename or move it, as they may know better
than you
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 11:47:49PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 12:28:39AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006, Frank K?ster wrote:
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a word of caution here: If the administrator has modified the
file, you
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 04:47:30AM -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Hi mentors!
I have a doubt.
I am creating a package of a Firefox/Mozilla extension. Upstream
author reselases two .xpi files, one for Firefox and another for
Mozilla. Since they are small, I was wanting to create just
17 matches
Mail list logo
