On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 11:51:47PM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
Dear all,
I'm writing some programs to decompress LHA files and need to use this
library. Thus, I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package:
ITP:: #367375
Package name: libjlha-java
Thank you Carlo,
Actually, I was cutting a few corners and did a quick
read through the Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 Bible as well as
a few other sites (I like IBM's site for quick answers
for lots of little tid bits!) and I created the DEBIAN
directory with associated files and skipped the
dh_install
Hi all,
Sorry if it is off topic but y don't know where to post.
137 days ago, I provided a patch to fix and improve the apache2 init.d script.
The patch wasn't applied, the bug is still here, i see it every time i
install a new webserver. I guess it bugs others users so i proposed my
help (
On 6/13/06, DusteD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i would like to help the debian project if
there is any need for a english danish translator.
Where do i go from here ?
You should subscribe to the debian-l10n-danish list[1] and present
yourself/ask for more info there.
[1]
Kari Pahula wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 06:50:19PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
* debian/control: Architecture is set to i386 amd64. What prevents
the package from being usable on other architectures? Are you sure
you don't mean any?
flamerobin depends on
I updated my package to the latest upstream release :
http://www.le-vert.net/divers/debian-packages/museek+/museek+-0.1.10/
http://www.le-vert.net/divers/debian-packages/museek+/museek+_0.1.10-1.dsc
I'm still looking for a sponsor ;-)
Thx
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
OK, here's another attempt. I've fixed the only outstanding bug and built in
pbuilder sid. The package is lintian and linda clean.
I'm looking for a sponsor for (previously orphaned) xboard package. :-)
- Package:xboard
- Version: 4.2.7-5
- License: GPL
- Description:
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 14:25 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 13:09 +0100, Adam James wrote:
A minor quibble with your post, the following is from the Debian
Developer's Reference [0]:
Note the spaces prepending the line, which serves to break the lines
correctly. To
Hello *,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 07:27:27AM -0400, Alexander L. Belikoff wrote:
OK, here's another attempt. I've fixed the only outstanding bug and
built in pbuilder sid. The package is lintian and linda clean.
I'm looking for a sponsor for (previously orphaned) xboard package. :-)
Looking
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 14:25 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Hmm indeed, but to be honest I don't understand dit. I can't tell how
this extra space will aid in the breaking of lines? The only space in
that line will be right after Homepage: and I dare
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 01:35:57PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 14:25 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 13:09 +0100, Adam James wrote:
A minor quibble with your post, the following is from the Debian
Developer's Reference [0]:
Note the
On 6/14/06, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The space is necessary; it tells package front-ends to not wrap the line.
See Policy 5.6.13.
I guess you are referring to:
Those starting with two or more spaces. These will be displayed
verbatim. If the display cannot be panned horizontally,
Margarita Manterola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When the URL is something like http://www.myniceproject.org, I don't see
that would be the difference in having the extra space or not.
Well, it matters to people with 20-character-wide windows, if there are
any such people (there could potentially
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 08:27 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Thus proving that the real solution is to get rid of the Homepage bit
completely and instead add a real field to dpkg, since people won't even
agree on and follow the syntax for the hack of putting it in the long
description so that
Hello,
my package does not build on ia64 due to what seems to be dependency
problems:
/usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/apt-get --purge $CHROOT_OPTIONS -q -y install
debhelper libapt-front-dev libqt4-dev qt4-dev-tools docbook-to-man pkg-config
libmysqlclient15-dev
Reading Package Lists...
Hi Ben,
What package is it? I've got a sparc64 (sun4u) machine that I can try the
build on if you like?
Cheers
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Mesing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 June 2006 20:02
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Cc: Enrico Zini
Subject: Package does
Hello,
What package is it?
It's packagesearch
I've got a sparc64 (sun4u) machine that I can try the
build on if you like?
That would be helpful, please do so.
Best regards
Ben
--
Please do not send any email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- all email not
originating from the mailing list will be
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
Hello,
my package does not build on ia64 due to what seems to be dependency
problems:
/usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/apt-get --purge $CHROOT_OPTIONS -q -y install
debhelper libapt-front-dev libqt4-dev qt4-dev-tools docbook-to-man pkg-config
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:01:30PM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
my package does not build on ia64 due to what seems to be dependency
problems:
/usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/apt-get --purge $CHROOT_OPTIONS -q -y install
debhelper libapt-front-dev libqt4-dev qt4-dev-tools docbook-to-man
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:11:32AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
I don't think any part of packages (description or separate field) are
the correct place for the Homepage field.
Yes, that's because it's an unneeded duplication of what's already
present in /usr/share/doc/*/copyright. The description
Margarita Manterola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 6/14/06, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The space is necessary; it tells package front-ends to not wrap the line.
See Policy 5.6.13.
I guess you are referring to:
Those starting with two or more spaces. These will be displayed
Benjamin Mesing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libapt-front-dev: Depends: libtagcoll-dev ( 1.6) but 1.6.3-1 is to
be installed
This is your actual problem and libapt-front-dev seems to be too old.
Now you have to find out if
On 6/15/06, Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:11:32AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
I don't think any part of packages (description or separate field) are
the correct place for the Homepage field.
Yes, that's because it's an unneeded duplication of what's already
On 6/15/06, Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Policy does not talk about
URLs, it just explains what the extra space is for.
It matters if you have
http://www.my.real.long.and.cool.domain.name.that.i.so.love.net/all/my/projects/package/html/
C'mon, how often does that happen? 1 in
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 01:41:06AM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
I don't think any part of packages (description or separate field) are
the correct place for the Homepage field.
Yes, that's because it's an unneeded duplication of what's already
present in /usr/share/doc/*/copyright. The
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
Think about somebody wanting to NMU because a bug has a fix in
upstream and the current mainatiner is too busy or MIA. How
difficult is it to get to the upstream? Is REALLY hard, belive me!
I hate to point this out this pointedly, but if someone
On 6/15/06, Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
Think about somebody wanting to NMU because a bug has a fix in
upstream and the current mainatiner is too busy or MIA. How
difficult is it to get to the upstream? Is REALLY hard, belive me!
I hate to
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Rene Engelhard wrote:
- Please make everything -1 since the whole thing is your * Initial
release
- Close the ITP (see above)
- up-to-date standards-version is 3.7.2
- You don't really need the dh_listpackages and find infrastructure
which just was done by me
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 6/15/06, Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if someone wanting to NMU is incapable of examining the copyright
file to find the location of upstream, they shouldn't be making an
NMU.
That is a point, but still the users might find the link
Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, that's because it's an unneeded duplication of what's already
present in /usr/share/doc/*/copyright. The description is meant to
convey information about where you can find useful things about the
package, not about where you can download a new
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
A wedged buildd config: apt was probably put on hold because the new
version was SIGBUSing on sparc, and packagesearch naturally needs the
current version of apt for building, so someone will need to un-hold apt on
mrpurply. I'll talk to the admins.
31 matches
Mail list logo
