Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fathi Boudra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name : libsynaptics
Version : 0.14.4d
Upstream Author : Stefan Kombrink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://qsynaptics.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description: library to access the synaptics touch pad driver
Good morning,
we - the mentors.debian.net team - have been running the mentors service
for 3 years now. During that period ~500 package maintainers have
uploaded many revisions of ~1200 different packages. Still the service
was not very user-friendly and we could have done better to help
Hi Christoph,
the mail address [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces. I sent a private
mail to your debian address with the log of the bounce message.
Another problem that occured to me is that the sign-up web interface
refuses my publickey. It complains that the mail address I entered does
not match an
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.05-5
of my package libhtml-fromtext-perl.
I'm a current maintainer.
It builds these binary packages:
libhtml-fromtext-perl - Mark up text as HTML
With the new release, I've updated a new Debian Policy,
Standard-Version 3.6.2 to
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 10:30:37AM +0200, Kevin Bube wrote:
the mail address [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces. I sent a private
mail to your debian address with the log of the bounce message.
Yes, I received it. Thanks. I still blame it on outdated DNS data
because I can reach the support address from
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 10:36:03AM +0200, Francesco Cecconi wrote:
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Done.
Best Regards,
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I have a package that needs four pactches. I put the four patches into debian/patches and cdbs patches just fine. I want not use cdbs if possible for I am confused at how exactly it is working, but what debhelper command do you use to patch? I see none listed under man debhelper, no dh_patch or
Le Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 07:50:11AM -0600, Joseph Smidt a écrit :
I tried using dpatch but it complained it couldn't understand
the .patch files syntax even when I changed them to have .dpatch endings.
Hi,
Here is something I wrote in an unreleased text:
-
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:05:32AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 10:30:37AM +0200, Kevin Bube wrote:
Another problem that occured to me is that the sign-up web interface
refuses my publickey. It complains that the mail address I entered does
not match an address
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 07:50:11AM -0600, Joseph Smidt wrote:
I have a package that needs four pactches. I put the four patches into
debian/patches and cdbs patches just fine. I want not use cdbs if possible
for I am confused at how exactly it is working,
It is a very good idea not to use
Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have reworked the PGP key handling. Please try again. I'm confident
that your key will now work better.
Now I get this:
Traceback (most recent call last): File
/home/www/mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-signup, line 99, in ?
addError =
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:06:40PM +0200, Kevin Bube wrote:
Now I get this:
Traceback (most recent call last): File [...]
Fixed, too. :)
I hope that this concludes the debugging on this mailing list.
Please send further bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or if
that address fails: [EMAIL
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 07:50:11AM -0600, Joseph Smidt wrote:
I have a package that needs four pactches. I put the four patches into
debian/patches and cdbs patches just fine. I want not use cdbs if possible
for I am confused at how exactly it is working, but what debhelper command
do you
Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 07:50:11AM -0600, Joseph Smidt wrote:
I have a package that needs four pactches. I put the four patches into
debian/patches and cdbs patches just fine. I want not use cdbs if possible
for I am confused at how exactly it is working,
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 07:28:45AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 10:13:33AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
Since switching to the new site means changing DNS entries the server
may temporarily be unavailable. There are also rumors that our
[EMAIL PROTECTED] address is not
Hi Joseph! =)
On 6/19/06, Joseph Smidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you correctly apply .patch files without cdbs? Do you just have to
hardcode all the patch commands into debian/rules?
That's one way: you can obviously have some shell snippet in
debian/rules that would scan a directory
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 10:13:33AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
Since switching to the new site means changing DNS entries the server
may temporarily be unavailable. There are also rumors that our
[EMAIL PROTECTED] address is not working. We blame that on DNS,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:osamu$ dig
On 6/19/06, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure I'm not doing it correctly. How do you correctly apply .patch
files without cdbs?
At this point you should probably learn to use dpkg v2 source
archives, which allow patches without third party patch applying
code (and build deps).
On 6/19/06, Eddy Petrişor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/19/06, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure I'm not doing it correctly. How do you correctly apply .patch
files without cdbs?
At this point you should probably learn to use dpkg v2 source
archives, which allow patches
Kevin Bube [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I will put the files temporaily on my own homepage this evening.
It is now on http://www.icbm.de/~bube/debian/
Regards,
Kevin
--
publickey 2048R/0AFDFB19: http://www.icbm.de/~bube/publickey.asc
fingerprint: 542B 1378 04AA AF1F 572E 78BF 1BF5 5C71 0AFD
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 09:59:40 -0400, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
dpatch uses a patch patch format, where the first column is all
pluses; they're really ugly.
I don't know what version of dpatch you're using, but that's not the
case here. For example, from the alsaplayer Debian
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Can someone, please, do an upload of pngnq for me?
It's fixing a FTBFS.
Files are here:
http://biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br/naoliv/pngnq/
Thank you very much!
Uploaded.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Dear DDs,
Not so long ago me and Michael Hanke created an alioth project
http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-exppsy/
aimed provide Debian-aware psychologists with the means of carrying out
their experiments, such as stimuli delivery and response registration
tools.
Also I took over
Hi All,How to sign a package ? Is it mandatiory that I use -s or -k option of dpkg-buildpackage like;$dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -sgpg -k [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Let me know if there is any other way because I hope this signs the package while building the package itself.RegardsPrasad kadambi-- My
Prasad Ramamurthy Kadambi wrote:
Hi All,
How to sign a package ? Is it mandatiory that I use -s or -k option of
dpkg-buildpackage like;
$dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -sgpg -k [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Let me know if there is any other way because I hope this signs the package
while building the
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 01:45:43AM +0530, Prasad Ramamurthy Kadambi wrote:
Hi All,
How to sign a package ? Is it mandatiory that I use -s or -k option of
dpkg-buildpackage like;
$dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -sgpg -k [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Let me know if there is any other way because I hope
* Mon 2006-06-19 Justin Pryzby justinpryzby AT users.sourceforge.net
* Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At this point you should probably learn to use dpkg v2 source
archives, which allow patches without third party patch applying
code (and build deps).
Hi All,Is it OK if I sign package.deb leaving out .dsc and .changes file ?Also Should I sign .orig.tar.gz ?TIAPrasad Kadambi-- My Fingerprint:1024D/A526A4A5 :6D7A E790 B4A1 5554 54E2ECF3 1AA8 6EEE A526 A4A5
* Mon 2006-06-19 Joseph Smidt jsmidt AT byu.edu
* Message-Id: 142682e10606190650y3662b7eex89accc2d6c9ecbae AT mail.gmail.com
I have a package that needs four pactches. I put the four patches into
debian/patches and cdbs patches just fine. I want not use cdbs if possible
for I am confused at
Hello,
Prasad Ramamurthy Kadambi schrieb:
Is it OK if I sign package.deb leaving out .dsc and .changes file ?
There is a provision to do that, however that is optional and currently
pretty much unsupported (in fact IIRC there is a hook that auto-rejects
signed packages these days).
Take
Prasad Ramamurthy Kadambi wrote:
Hi Sander,
On 6/20/06, Sander Marechal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use:
$ debuild -S
But the man page does not speak about this, how do we come to use.
Any pointers to debuild help ?
I took it from the new maintainers guide and the Ubuntu documentation.
Whee!?
I'm adopting hashalot, one of the packages Matthias Urlichs recently
gave away. He doesn't have the time nowadays, so it would be nice if
someone could sponsor this package.
It's a simple package with straightforward packaging.
My changes:
* a cleanup of debian/rules
*
Whee!?
I'm looking for a sponsor for tcng, another package of Matthias Urlichs
that I'm adopting.
This upload fixes two unreported RC issues, introduces a new major
upstream release and fixes 5 of 6 bugs in the BTS.
RC bugs:
* FTBFS outside pbuilder
* conflict for the binary name tcc, also
Jari Aalto+mail.linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's pretty much it to activate dpatch support. You have to generate
the individual patches (with any means confortable to you) and convert
them into dpatch format.
Dpatch really needs better instuctions.
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Hi!
On 6/4/06, Jörg Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, my question is: Can I release a package that bases on not-released
sources? If so, I request for an sponsor. Otherwise, what should I do?
Wait?
snip
You just need to take care if the program is really
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 07:19:44PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
That's pretty much it to activate dpatch support. You have to generate
the individual patches (with any means confortable to you) and convert
them into dpatch format.
Dpatch really needs better instuctions.
No, you just need to not
Jörg Sommer wrote:
Hallo Goswin,
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just make sure to use a version that sorts lower than a future actual
2.2 release. Optimaly 2.2~beta2 would be used but I think the DAK
still doesn't accept those. 2.1.99+2.2-beta might be a good choice.
Whee!?
I'm looking for a sponsor for my pet package kbtin, an extended
beyond recognition fork of tintin++. And, unlike any other MUD
client in Debian, kbtin can be used to play a popular game named
dpkg-buildpackage when piping the output through less and friends
doesn't cut it. At least, less
Whee!?
In an attempt to infringe on commercial free speech, I'm looking for
a sponsor for a new package, dnscruft.
It feeds bind9 a list of domains like:
* doubleclick.net
* googlesyndication.com
and a plethora of other advertisers, spammers, win32 spyware spewers,
phishers and other miscreants
Hi!
Kapil and I are searching for a sponsor for pngcrush.
It's a new upstream release, fixing one bug and some typos on pngcrush manpage.
Files are here:
http://biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br/naoliv/pngcrush/
And just one thing, please.
Build with -v1.6.2-1 so the changes from version 1.6.3-1
Le Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:01:39PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko a écrit :
* Maintainer address set to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and since none of us
is DD yet we saw no point to include us in Uploaders. This fact makes
lintian unhappy and complaining about changelog-should-mention-nmu,
Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:01:39PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko a écrit :
* Maintainer address set to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and since none of us
is DD yet we saw no point to include us in Uploaders. This fact makes
lintian unhappy and complaining
42 matches
Mail list logo
