On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 05:32:12PM -0400, Charles Fry wrote:
Depends. Does it actually fix the warning?
Yes, but it also broke my binary, which can no longer find the needed
library. Any suggestions? Is rpath okay in this case? The needed library
is coming from
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor for 'csup', a pure C CVSup client. It doesn't
require the overhead of the Modula-3 compiler to be built.
There is an outstanding ITP on bug number 332858 but no activity since 11th
October 2005. This wouldn't close it, as at the moment it's a CVSup client
only (no
In almost any situation rpath is a bad thing. It is a very good idea to let
lintian check this. A private library for the package is an exception. Of
course lintian could also check and allow /usr/lib/$packagename without a
warning. However, the rpath check is useful in general, because
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 09:40:23AM -0400, Charles Fry wrote:
In almost any situation rpath is a bad thing. It is a very good idea to
let lintian check this. A private library for the package is an
exception. Of course lintian could also check and allow
/usr/lib/$packagename without a
Hello,
Yet another attempt to find a sponsor for the shc package. Fixes several
RC-bugs as described by Frank Lichtenheld in #335278 buglog. Changes read:
shc (3.8.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New upstream release. (Closes: #338451)
* Clear out shc.c ARC4
Hello !
I wrote a little sudoku solver in C with Xlib, and I debianized it.
So, I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it on official repository.
package and source can be found at :
http://candide.homeunix.com/xsudoku/
thanks !
--
Maxime ROBACHE
UTC - Etudiant en Génie Informatique
From memory, aren't NMU's (even more so, non-DD NMU's) only meant to
fix RC bugs? Not new upstream releases?
Just 2 cents
On 7/14/06, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Yet another attempt to find a sponsor for the shc package. Fixes several
RC-bugs as described by Frank
On 2006-07-13, Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From memory, aren't NMU's (even more so, non-DD NMU's) only meant to
fix RC bugs? Not new upstream releases?
0-day nmus are to fix RC bugs.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Thursday 13 July 2006 23:22, Nigel Jones wrote:
From memory, aren't NMU's (even more so, non-DD NMU's) only meant to
fix RC bugs? Not new upstream releases?
Just 2 cents
This new upstream release (3.8.6) resolves both: rc4 implementation bugs and
license issues. If I go for backporting
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 09:21:01PM +0200, Maxime ROBACHE wrote:
Hello !
I wrote a little sudoku solver in C with Xlib, and I debianized it.
So, I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it on official repository.
package and source can be found at :
http://candide.homeunix.com/xsudoku/
Could
Are there any special considerations or instructions for building a
Debian package for a Java program?
I'm going to need to create some Debs for the Java programs I write. I
was looking over some of the documentation about making Debian
packages, and it seems like some of the instructions
Redefined Horizons wrote:
Are there any special considerations or instructions for building a
Debian package for a Java program?
I'm going to need to create some Debs for the Java programs I write. I
was looking over some of the documentation about making Debian
packages, and it seems like some
hi
On Friday 14 July 2006 09:59, Redefined Horizons wrote:
Are there any special considerations or instructions for building a
Debian package for a Java program?
P.S. - Is there anyone working on a Debian package for NetBeans? I'd
The place to ask would be debian-java
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 08:22:25AM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
From memory, aren't NMU's (even more so, non-DD NMU's) only meant to
fix RC bugs? Not new upstream releases?
On 7/14/06, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yet another attempt to find a sponsor for the shc package. Fixes
14 matches
Mail list logo
