On Friday 14 July 2006 03:52, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 08:22:25AM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
From memory, aren't NMU's (even more so, non-DD NMU's) only meant to
fix RC bugs? Not new upstream releases?
On 7/14/06, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yet
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:34:20AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
Agreed. Fixed. There is no any chance for a comaintenance either, since the
maintainer has been MIA for almost 1 year now and these RC-bugs are left
unaddressed. Also seems he will not file a RFH, FRA, or O or ask for
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:34:20AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
shc (3.8.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
^^^
This is the wrong version number for an NMU anyway.
True. Fixed as -0.1. Hm, it would be nice if lintian and linda warn if
changelog claims Non-maintainer upload
On Friday 14 July 2006 10:08, Bas Wijnen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:34:20AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
shc (3.8.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
^^^
This is the wrong version number for an NMU anyway.
True. Fixed as -0.1. Hm, it would be nice if lintian and
Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 05:32:12PM -0400, Charles Fry wrote:
Depends. Does it actually fix the warning?
Yes, but it also broke my binary, which can no longer find the needed
library. Any suggestions? Is rpath okay in this case? The needed
Hi Mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor for this tiny screen cast utility named byzanz:
* Package name: byzanz
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Benjamin Otte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://people.freedesktop.org/~company/byzanz
* License : GPL
Description
El Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:56:00 +0300
George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Friday 14 July 2006 10:08, Bas Wijnen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:34:20AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
shc (3.8.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
^^^
This is the wrong version
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 01:31:22PM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
That also should be catched and warned, since an NMU done by a
maintaner makes no sense.
It's not very common, but it does: the NMU is prepared by another
non-DD and the package maintainer sponsors it.
I remember a thread
On Friday 14 July 2006 14:49, Bas Wijnen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 01:31:22PM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
That also should be catched and warned, since an NMU done by a
maintaner makes no sense.
It's not very common, but it does: the NMU is prepared by another
non-DD and the
Hi,
is it possible to have two different binary packages with the same
source package name (but different upstream versions of the source)?
Reason: I'm about to package octave-forge for both Octave 2.1 and 2.9
(you can consider octave-forge as plugin, that needs to be compiled for
the
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 02:34:41PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
is it possible to have two different binary packages with the same
source package name (but different upstream versions of the source)?
No. The package with the later version will overwrite the earlier
one, and this will cause the
So please, please, please do fix (remove) the rpath in the package.
I would appreciate any tips on how to go about fixing this. My package
is courierpassd, currently only available in unstable. It depends on
courier-authlib which currently uses /usr/lib/courier-authlib. I can't
figure out how to
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:57:26AM -0400, Charles Fry wrote:
So please, please, please do fix (remove) the rpath in the package.
I would appreciate any tips on how to go about fixing this. My package
is courierpassd, currently only available in unstable. It depends on
courier-authlib which
Charles Fry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So please, please, please do fix (remove) the rpath in the package.
I would appreciate any tips on how to go about fixing this. My package
is courierpassd, currently only available in unstable. It depends on
courier-authlib which currently uses
Dear Justin Pryzby, you wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 09:21:01PM +0200, Maxime ROBACHE wrote:
I wrote a little sudoku solver in C with Xlib, and I debianized it.
So, I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it on official repository.
I'm not your sponsor, but you might find it interesting to
Hi debian-mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 210r20001005-1 of the
package jzip, a text mode interpreter for Z-Code adventures. It was
recently orphaned (see #377871), and I'm adopting it and updating to a
new upstream version from the year 2000. Although upstream development
Hi Carlos,
I had a look at your package.
I found some issues before I try to build it:
Carlos Enrique Carleos Artime [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Package name : giac
* License : GPL (separate package for non-free documents)
It builds these binary packages:
giac - computer algebra
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor for zimpl, a mathematical modeling language for
optimization problems.
RFP/ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=365073
* Package name: zimpl
Version : 2.04
Upstream Author : Thorsten Koch koch(at)zib.de
* URL :
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 08:47:01AM +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote:
hi,
i've got a lintian error:
E: libstrigihtmlgui0: shlib-with-non-pic-code
usr/lib/libstrigihtmlgui.so.0.3.2
[...]
It seems to use -fPIC and shared as mentionned by lintian and i didn't find
any assembly code.
[...]
Any
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package bashish.
* Package name: bashish
Version : 2.0.5-1
Upstream Author : Thomas Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://bashish.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Section : shells
It builds these
George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 14 July 2006 10:08, Bas Wijnen wrote:
They could check that non-NMU uploads must not say Non maintainer
upload in the changelog. Appearantly they don't do that. I think a
wishlist bug is in order there.
Well, it makes no difference which
Hi!
One week ago I have sent a message
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/07/msg00148.html)
requesting a sponsor for one package (pngnq), but I got no answers :-(
The package is very simple and it's already on Debian. It's OK with
pbuilder, linda and lintian.
If someone could verify
22 matches
Mail list logo