Re: dvipng: Version 1.8 package (NMU / New Maintainer)

2006-09-16 Thread George Danchev
On Saturday 16 September 2006 07:45, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: Hello, Hello Kapil, I wrote earlier on 03 Jul 2006: I would like someone to sponsor an adoption/hijacking or NMU'ing of a more recent version of dvipng than is available in the Debian archive. (Package description: dvipng

Re: dvipng: Version 1.8 package (NMU / New Maintainer)

2006-09-16 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, George Danchev wrote: On Saturday 16 September 2006 07:45, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/dvipng/dvipng_1.8-0.2.diff.gz http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/dvipng/dvipng_1.8-0.2.dsc

Re: dvipng: Version 1.8 package (NMU / New Maintainer)

2006-09-16 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, George Danchev wrote: Just to let you know that these are 'Not Found'. Why don't you upload to mentors.debian.net instead ? Regarding mentors.debian.net. I was unable to sign-up since the confirmation message didn't

Re: dvipng: Version 1.8 package (NMU / New Maintainer)

2006-09-16 Thread George Danchev
On Saturday 16 September 2006 09:58, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, George Danchev wrote: Just to let you know that these are 'Not Found'. Why don't you upload to mentors.debian.net instead ? Regarding

Re: dvipng: Version 1.8 package (NMU / New Maintainer)

2006-09-16 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, George Danchev wrote: Just a comment: your debian/rules clean target calls top-level Makefile's distclean target which depends on dvipng.1 target which calls unknown program of texi2pod.pl (probably a hack for local usage by the upstream authors, which is not

Re: binNMU safe and ${binary:Version} or ${source:Version}

2006-09-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 09:47:34AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: The BIG problem is how to get the next-version. Say you have version 1.2-3. A binNMU would be 1.2-3+b1, a security release would be 1.2-3etch1 (unless there was a

Re: RFS: isomd5sum (formerly anaconda) [uploaded]

2006-09-16 Thread Christoph Haas
On Friday 15 September 2006 18:11, James Westby wrote: On (14/09/06 15:15), Ryan Finnie wrote: isomd5sum_11.1.0.95-1 has been updated in-place. Removed .cvsignore, added md5.c information to debian/copyright, removed unnecessary current maintainer line from debian/copyright. James, thanks

RFS: museek+ -- daemon and clients for the Soulseek p2p network

2006-09-16 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package museek+. This is the third post of this RFS, please consider checking and sponsoring museek+. It's really a great software. Thanks in advance. * Package name : museek+ Version : 0.1.11-1 Upstream Author : Hyriand

Re: RFS: museek+ -- daemon and clients for the Soulseek p2p network

2006-09-16 Thread Christoph Haas
On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package museek+. I don't know why but the upstream tarball I just downloaded from http://puzzle.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/museek-plus/museek+-0.1.11.tar.bz2 differs in several places from

Re: RFS: museek+ -- daemon and clients for the Soulseek p2p network

2006-09-16 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Christoph Haas wrote: On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package museek+. I don't know why but the upstream tarball I just downloaded from

Re: dvipng: Version 1.8 package (NMU / New Maintainer)

2006-09-16 Thread James Westby
On (16/09/06 15:40), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: Hello, Updated packages at: http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/debian/dvipng/dvipng_1.8-0.3.diff.gz http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/debian/dvipng/dvipng_1.8-0.3.dsc

Re: RFS: museek+ -- daemon and clients for the Soulseek p2p network

2006-09-16 Thread Christoph Haas
On Saturday 16 September 2006 14:20, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: Christoph Haas wrote: On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package museek+. I don't know why but the upstream tarball I just downloaded from

Re: RFS: museek+ -- daemon and clients for the Soulseek p2p network

2006-09-16 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Christoph Haas wrote: On Saturday 16 September 2006 14:20, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: Christoph Haas wrote: On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package museek+. I don't know why but the upstream

Re: dvipng: Version 1.8 package (NMU / New Maintainer)

2006-09-16 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote: On (16/09/06 15:40), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: Hi, package looks good. I just have a couple of points. * Why 1.8-0.3? Why not -0.1? I already uploaded 1.8-0.[12] earlier to various public places for people to check earlier so I wanted to

Re: dvipng: Version 1.8 package (NMU / New Maintainer)

2006-09-16 Thread James Westby
On (16/09/06 21:34), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote: * The debian/copyright file is lacking. There is no copyright information, what is referred to as Copyright is in fact a License, and not a copy of a license header from the package. I

License DData (was Re: RFS: haskell-uulib)

2006-09-16 Thread Arjan Oosting
[ cc-ed Daan Leijen as he is the author of the DData library and Alexey Rodriguez as he is the upstream maintainer of uulib ] Hi Daan and Alexey, I am trying to get the uulib Haskell library (formarly known as uust) of the Utrecht University into the Debian archive. As you probably know this

Re: RFS: frown

2006-09-16 Thread Arjan Oosting
Op za, 16-09-2006 te 00:13 +0100, schreef James Westby: On (15/09/06 23:21), Arjan Oosting wrote: Hi potential sponsors, As I am still in the NM queue I am searching for a sponsor for frown. * Package name: from Hi, package looks pretty cool. Thanks for packaging it. Thanks

Re: RFS: haskell-uulib

2006-09-16 Thread Arjan Oosting
Hi James, Op za, 16-09-2006 te 00:35 +0100, schreef James Westby: Hi, Again I cannot sponsor, but I have some comments on the package. * Also there is some boilerplate in files under debian/ that could be removed (debian/rules and debian/watch specifically). Fixed in svn, will be

Re: RFS: museek+ -- daemon and clients for the Soulseek p2p network

2006-09-16 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: Christoph Haas wrote: On Saturday 16 September 2006 14:20, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: Christoph Haas wrote: On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package

Re: RFS: frown

2006-09-16 Thread James Westby
On (16/09/06 09:12), Arjan Oosting wrote: Op za, 16-09-2006 te 00:13 +0100, schreef James Westby: * debian/dirs is redundant here. Huh? Why is it redundant? The upstream Makefile does not create $(bindir) so I debian/dirs to make sure usr/bin exists. Sorry. debian/dirs is not redundant

Re: dvipng: Version 1.8 package (NMU / New Maintainer)

2006-09-16 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 05:16:06PM +0100, James Westby wrote: On (16/09/06 21:34), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote: * The debian/copyright file is lacking. There is no copyright information, what is referred to as Copyright is in fact a License,

RFS: anymeal (take two)

2006-09-16 Thread Sandro Tosi
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package anymeal. This is the second RFS about this package: the first sponsorship got rejected by ftpmaster due to missing license note about images (this pkg should solve this issue). * Package name: anymeal Version : 0.29-3-2

Re: Can a package using a cow-shell be cow-builded?

2006-09-16 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, I am preparing the package of a software which provides regression tests in a separate directory, for which there is no make clean available. For the moment, I copy the directory somewhere else, perform the tests in (it generates many files), and delete the directory in debian/rules