On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:23:21PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I think that I will provide a PDF, and ship the .doc files (as I they
are the source...).
If the only reason you ship them is that they are source, be sure to not ship
them in the binary package, but only in the source package
On Monday, 18.09.2006 at 12:27 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 03:19:27AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You cant generate passwords with only numbers in it with pwgen.
Sounds like a chance for a feature enhancement you could make.
But maybe pwgen is better i dont
Hi everybody,
if I add a dependency on util-linux because I need that /sbin/getty is
installed, why must this dependency be versioned?
If I simply add Depends: util-linux lintian complains loudly and issues
an error message:
depends-on-essential-package-without-using-version depends: util-linux
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 01:29:27PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
if I add a dependency on util-linux because I need that /sbin/getty is
installed, why must this dependency be versioned?
If I simply add Depends: util-linux lintian complains loudly and issues
an error message:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:01:27 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, thanks. But my tool dont need pipes and my pw.txt file looks like this:
password01
pass02
andmore
pwgen output file looks likes:
password pass02 andmore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pwgen -1 10 10 pwd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat pwd
Yo,
i wrote this already some mails ago, that i was wrong with much stuff i said
about pwgen, cause i did not understand
the man page when i tested it some days ago, sorry was my fault. Pwgen is
pretty GOOD.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet:
Hi mentors,
I have a problem with bug reporting. I maintain a package and found some
bugs with it. Is it correct way to report bugs on my own package, or should
I just fix these bugs and describe about it on changelog? I briefly read
Debian Developer's Reference, but I couldn't find the
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 01:29:27PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
if I add a dependency on util-linux because I need that /sbin/getty is
installed, why must this dependency be versioned?
If I simply add Depends: util-linux lintian complains loudly and issues
an error
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 04:38:28PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Sounds reasonable. Thanks for the explanation.
Sometimes I wished lintian would display hints like yours and not only
such short one liners.
The same explanation that Steve gave is found in the Debian Policy
and/or the
Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
Hi mentors,
I have a problem with bug reporting. I maintain a package and found some
bugs with it. Is it correct way to report bugs on my own package, or should
I just fix these bugs and describe about it on changelog? I briefly read
Debian Developer's Reference, but
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 04:38:28PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Sometimes I wished lintian would display hints like yours and not only
such short one liners.
Use lintian -i for more verbose output.
Cheers,
Franz
--
Franz Pletz \ A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
www:
Hi,
Sometimes I wished lintian would display hints like yours and not only
such short one liners.
The same explanation that Steve gave is found in the Debian Policy
and/or the developer reference. Hopefully, you have read both of those.
If you use lintian -i you get a more detailed
Franz Pletz wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 04:38:28PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Sometimes I wished lintian would display hints like yours and not only
such short one liners.
Use lintian -i for more verbose output.
Mea culpa! I indeed missed -i completely. Next time I better learn how
to
On Monday 18 September 2006 16:30, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
I have a problem with bug reporting. I maintain a package and found some
bugs with it. Is it correct way to report bugs on my own package, or
should I just fix these bugs and describe about it on changelog? I
briefly read Debian
Le mardi 12 septembre 2006 13:54, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) a écrit :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.2-2
of my package cobalt-panel-utils.
It builds these binary packages:
cobalt-panel-utils - System utilities for Sun Cobalt's LCD and LEDs
The package is
Le samedi 16 septembre 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) a écrit :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package museek+.
This is the third post of this RFS, please consider checking and
sponsoring museek+.
It's really a great software.
Thanks in advance.
* Package name :
Hi all,
I updated aspell-uz to a new upstream release. It is available from
http://www.uni-bremen.de/~kmashrab/uzbek-word-list/aspell-uz-0.6.0-1.tar.bz2
Could anybody please have a look at it and upload? Brian?
Thanks,
Mashrab.
--
Mashrab Kuvatov
PGP key:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 7.6-1
of the package malaga. It'd be the first step in having Debian include
the new high quality, GPL'd Finnish spellchecking Voikko
(http://hunspell-fi.org/tiedostot.php). Existing spellcheckers don't
really have the capabilities to
Hi Thierry,
I'm interested in sponsoring your package gstm 1.2-3. I will review
your package and contact you via e-mail. (I'm still in the NM queue,
but my AM requests me to prepare a sponsored package as part of my NM
procedure.)
Regards,
Bart Martens
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Monday 18 September 2006 20:07, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 7.6-1
of the package malaga. It'd be the first step in having Debian include
the new high quality, GPL'd Finnish spellchecking Voikko
George Danchev wrote:
Ok, you have a Source: packagename, which declares two (or more) Package:
packagenames which are Architecture: all and Architecture: any, and you need
to declare a strict versioned dependency between them,
AFAICT, that's the key - am I right in thinking that if the
George Danchev kirjoitti:
- be binNMU-safe (if possible;-) - for the Package: libmalaga-dev
(since it is Architecture: any and strictly depends on a package which is
also
Architecture: any) use Depends: libmalaga7 ${binary:Version} and
Build-Depends: dpkg-dev = 1.13.19 in order to explore
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:39:34 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
- convert doc-control to UTF-8 since it contains character (ö) which is not
present in iso-8859-1 if I'm not mistaken about the current encoding.
'ö' is longer in iso-8859-1 than utf-8 even exists ;-)
But I agree that the files in
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 07:46:37PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
George Danchev wrote:
Ok, you have a Source: packagename, which declares two (or more) Package:
packagenames which are Architecture: all and Architecture: any, and you
need
to declare a strict versioned dependency between
Hi. Quoting some context below. I have finally received a response
from the Singular team, and I have further questions.
My original query to debian-mentors@lists.debian.org follows:
On 15/09/06, Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, everyone.
I'm trying to learn the process
On Sunday 17 September 2006 23:01, Toni Mueller wrote:
Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a program like 'what' on BSD, but on Linux (obviously).
The following is taken from the man page:
what - show what versions of object modules were used to construct a
file
Sample run:
$ what /bsd
/bsd
On (17/09/06 13:10), Mashrab Kuvatov wrote:
Hi all,
I've filed an ITP bug report #387824 for hunspell-uz and uploaded the files
I've built into
http://www.uni-bremen.de/~kmashrab/uzbek-word-list/hunspell-uz-0.6.deb.tar.bz2
Hi, I can't sponsor as I am not a DD, but I have some comments,
On (17/09/06 21:27), PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package lisaac.
* Package name: lisaac
Hi, a few more comments for you,
* What is #CONFIGURE-STAMP# in debian/rules?
* You have a file debian/patch-stamp in the source package. This
28 matches
Mail list logo
