Il giorno Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:31:41 +0200
Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Sending the message to the right ml
I see :)
In addiction, you have modified upstream code (Makefile) without using
a patch-system. That's bad :)
As James point out, you should use wnpp before start
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote:
On (20/09/06 15:00), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Hello,
Could someone please sponsor a New Maintainer upload of swish++?
http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/debian/swish++/swish++_6.1.4-0pre3.dsc
or
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote detailed comments
on my packaging of swish++.
Consequently, I have newer versions at:
http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/debian/swish++/swish++_6.1.4-0pre4.dsc
or
On (21/09/06 12:00), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote:
On (20/09/06 15:00), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Hello,
Could someone please sponsor a New Maintainer upload of swish++?
Note: Must bump version to 6.1.4-1 before upload.
Why
On Thursday 21 September 2006 10:27, James Westby wrote:
On (21/09/06 12:00), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote:
On (20/09/06 15:00), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Hello,
Could someone please sponsor a New Maintainer upload of swish++?
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.2-6
of my package zinc-compiler.
It builds these binary packages:
zinc-compiler - Compiler of Zinc, a functional logic programming
language
The package is lintian clean and builds OK in a clean sid chroot.
The upload would fix
Thanks for your hints Sandro. So what's the best thing for my package?
Remove it from mentors? Fix it? What?
I think the best is to get in touch with Adam, and maybe comaintain
the package with him, if it's ok for both of you.
Regards,
Sandro
--
Sandro Tosi (aka Morpheus, matrixhasu)
My
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:28:38 +0200
Nacho Barrientos Arias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to who uploaded the package but the upload was rejected due to
the explained below.
If you sponsor this upload, note that it needs a full source upload due
to orig file in Debian archive differs a bit
On (21/09/06 13:24), Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:28:38 +0200
Nacho Barrientos Arias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to who uploaded the package but the upload was rejected due to
the explained below.
If you sponsor this upload, note that it needs a full source
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:10:34 +0100
James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think that will cut it. I think you need to fake a new upstream
version greater than that which is currently there.
mentors.d.n allows you to overwrite files in the archive, while the
official archive does
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 23:17, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Neil Williams wrote:
Yavor Doganov wrote:
the files clearly indicate that they're under
GPL, but contain the confusing See the GNU Library General Public
License for more details.
Just a note: This could be down to the IDE
On (21/09/06 10:41), George Danchev wrote:
On Thursday 21 September 2006 10:27, James Westby wrote:
So that I can keep the ordering before the final upload.
For example the version after I incorporate the changes you suggest
will be 6.1.4-0pre4.
Isn't `pre' meant to be replaced by the
also sprach James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.09.21.1419 +0200]:
The convention is, I believe, that an upload to mentors.debian.net
does not count as a release, as anyone who downloads a package
from there should realise it is a work in flux and handle that
appropriately.
What speaks
On 9/20/06, Yavor Doganov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.2.dfsg-1
of my package rssreader.app.
Ok. Some comments after having downloaded and built the -3 version
(which I manually converted into -2 again, since the -2 was never in
Hello,
Many thanks for the suggestions.
Unfortunately, the debian php5 package is compiled without the
--with-config-file-scan-dir=/etc/ option, that could make things easier.
I guess it is something about security.
I already downloaded the source package of imagemagick php extension and read
On (21/09/06 14:29), martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.09.21.1419 +0200]:
The convention is, I believe, that an upload to mentors.debian.net
does not count as a release, as anyone who downloads a package
from there should realise it is a work in flux
On Monday 18 September 2006 18:13, Mashrab Kuvatov wrote:
Hi all,
I updated aspell-uz to a new upstream release. It is available from
http://www.uni-bremen.de/~kmashrab/uzbek-word-list/aspell-uz-0.6.0-1.tar.bz2
Brian, could you please have a look at it?
Thanks,
Mashrab.
--
Mashrab
also sprach James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.09.21.1526 +0200]:
I think the reasoning is that it is the extra step for sponsors to
build with -v.
... and sometimes -sa.
Perhaps we could have a convention that the version number is
incremented as you like, but if the sponsor requests it
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 14:01, James Westby wrote:
Not the tarball that I downloaded. It only contained a .tar.gz. I see it
is fixed in this version though. Thanks for that.
Anybody to sponsor it? Please. :-)
Mashrab.
--
Mashrab Kuvatov
PGP key: www.uni-bremen.de/~kmashrab/kmashrab.asc
On Thursday 21 September 2006 16:51, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.09.21.1526
+0200]:
I think the reasoning is that it is the extra step for sponsors to
build with -v.
... and sometimes -sa.
That is a sponsoree job to mention to... as a maintainer
also sprach George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.09.21.1608 +0200]:
That is a sponsoree job to mention to... as a maintainer note.
Agreed. Ideally, the dpkg-dev tools should be more cautious too.
1.2-3~mentors.1
1.2-3~mentors.2
1.2-3~mentors.3
[...]
That would cause sponsoree
On Thursday 21 September 2006 17:21, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.09.21.1608 +0200]:
That is a sponsoree job to mention to... as a maintainer note.
Agreed. Ideally, the dpkg-dev tools should be more cautious too.
1.2-3~mentors.1
On (21/09/06 12:47), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote detailed comments
on my packaging of swish++.
Consequently, I have newer versions at:
http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/debian/swish++/swish++_6.1.4-0pre4.dsc
Hi,
Your debian/copyright
Lovely mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages suomi-malaga, libvoikko,
tmispell-voikko and oo2-voikko. They also require the updated
version of malaga to be uploaded, for which I already made an RFS here
and received feedback (thanks for that). The 7.6-2 is at
On Thursday 21 September 2006 03:00, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
Luca bedogni wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package spcaview.
* Package name: spcaview
Version : 1.1.5-1
Upstream Author : Michel Xhaard
* URL
В Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:35:15 -0300, Margarita Manterola написа:
Running linda over the package gives this:
E: rssreader.app; The character '¼' is forbidden by RFC822.
E: rssreader.app; The character 'Ã' is forbidden by RFC822.
I really don't know how to fix these, debian/control contains
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.0.9-1
of my package qpopper.
I found his package was adopted 5month ago and I took it.
http://bugs.debian.org/364615
It builds these binary packages:
qpopper- Enhanced Post Office Protocol server (POP3)
qpopper-drac - Qpopper
On Thursday 21 September 2006 18:49, hi wkby wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hello Hiro,
Looks fine, and here are some minor points you might want to address
first:
* debhelper compat 5 (and make changes if needed)
* you might want to use your real name rather than a nick ? ;-)
* debian/copyright
Hi,
a package I'm maintaining (aria2) has a working watch file in it, but on
the debian QA page, there is no entry in the watch column. What could be
the reason for this? Do I have to do anything special or does it take
more time? (the package was uploaded around 11 days ago and entered
testing).
On (15/09/06 23:32), Arjan Oosting wrote:
Hi potential sponsors,
As I am still in the NM queue I am searching for a sponsor for
haskell-edison.
* Package name: haskell-edison
* License : MIT/X
Hi,
Apologies that it took me a while to get to this package, it is more
complex
Sponsored (but not yet uploaded).
Kevin Coyner wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5.4
of my package rpl. The package was recently orphaned.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On (20/09/06 14:08), James Westby wrote:
I'll have another look on my next checking run, if they haven't been
sponsored by then.
They look good to me, though upstream could do with sorting out the
copyright and licenses.
I have tested the package and a short example seems to work well.
The
[I'm splitting this up to make it clearer what is going on]
On (21/09/06 18:12), Timo Jyrinki wrote:
Lovely mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages suomi-malaga, libvoikko,
tmispell-voikko and oo2-voikko. They also require the updated
version of malaga to be uploaded, for which
On (21/09/06 18:57), James Westby wrote:
[I'm splitting this up to make it clearer what is going on]
On (21/09/06 18:12), Timo Jyrinki wrote:
Lovely mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages suomi-malaga, libvoikko,
tmispell-voikko and oo2-voikko. They also require the
On (21/09/06 18:12), Timo Jyrinki wrote:
* Package name: suomi-malaga
Hi,
* Have you filed an ITP? If so you should close it in the changelog.
* Why does the source package go in section misc if it's only binary
package goes in to text?
* By convention the homepage is indented by
Георги Данчев wrote:
Well, that might not be the case with you, but I find Neil's note
quite reasonable to keep in mind.
I agree completely. I know about Anjuta's nefarious features in this
respect, so I always keep it in mind. But rather than trying to guess
upstream's intentions, I
Op do, 21-09-2006 te 09:23 -0700, schreef Patrick Ruckstuhl:
Hi,
a package I'm maintaining (aria2) has a working watch file in it, but on
the debian QA page, there is no entry in the watch column. What could be
the reason for this? Do I have to do anything special or does it take
more time?
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:39:16AM -0200, andremachado wrote:
Hello,
Many thanks for the suggestions.
Unfortunately, the debian php5 package is compiled without the
--with-config-file-scan-dir=/etc/ option, that could make things easier.
I guess it is something about security.
I already
Hi Craig and all,
At Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:42:48 +1000,
Craig Small wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 07:48:08AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
This is up to you; I've done it both ways in the past. If the bug is
affects the usability of the package, and it could take a while to fix it,
go ahead
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:14:55 -0300, Margarita Manterola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On 9/20/06, Yavor Doganov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.2.dfsg-1 of my
package rssreader.app.
I have the maintainer's blessing for the changes.
I wonder how it can
Le Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 02:41:36PM +0200, Nikolaus Schulz a écrit :
But alternatives have a bad tendency to represent the latest program
installed in the category, instead of the most wanted.
The alternatives system would have failed if this held true.
Nonetheless, if the local admins
41 matches
Mail list logo
