On Friday 22 September 2006 21:12, holoturoide wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.3-24
of my package xexec.
I just uploaded the package.
It builds these binary packages:
trueprint - pretty printing of source code
No idea where you got that from. But it doesn't build
Hi, James...
On Sunday 24 September 2006 11:39, James Stone wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tunapie.
Comments on the package:
debian/copyright...
- should contain the years of copyright like
Copyright (C) 2002-2006 John Doe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- should contain more than just
On Sunday 24 September 2006 02:33, Jack Grahams wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-5
of my package png2html (This package was previously orphaned).
Regarding debian/patches/01_makefilefix.dpatch:
Wouldn't it be easier if you installed the files into the appropriate
Hi,
James Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] (24/09/2006):
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:02:39 +0100, James Stone wrote:
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:08:31 +0100, James Stone wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tunapie.
* Package name: tunapie
Version : 1.0-2
Upstream Author :
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:59:54 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
Hi, James...
On Sunday 24 September 2006 11:39, James Stone wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tunapie.
Comments on the package:
debian/copyright...
- should contain the years of copyright like
Copyright (C)
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:14:47 +0200, Thomas Huriaux wrote:
There are still a few warnings in 1.0-4:
W: tunapie source: uses-dh-python-with-no-pycompat
W: tunapie source: not-using-po-debconf
W: tunapie source: out-of-date-standards-version
3.6.2 (current is 3.7.2) E: tunapie source:
Op ma, 25-09-2006 te 13:07 +0100, schreef James Stone:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:14:47 +0200, Thomas Huriaux wrote:
There are still a few warnings in 1.0-4:
W: tunapie source: uses-dh-python-with-no-pycompat
W: tunapie source: not-using-po-debconf
W: tunapie source:
James Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] (25/09/2006):
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:14:47 +0200, Thomas Huriaux wrote:
There are still a few warnings in 1.0-4:
W: tunapie source: uses-dh-python-with-no-pycompat
W: tunapie source: not-using-po-debconf
W: tunapie source: out-of-date-standards-version
Dear Muammar
Am Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 05:41:03PM -0400 hat Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez
getippert:
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Done.
Regards
--
Philipp | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +41 1 802 20 00
Frauenfelder | home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +41 1 862 73 14
[PGP]
Hello
Is there a way to leave the bug visible for my package, but reassign it
to apt-file?
Reassign it to packagesearch,apt-file ?
Is this an undocumented feature? From the documentation of the BTS:
reassign bugnumber package [ version ]
Records that bug
Hello
Options I have thought about, but found not to be optimal:
* File a bug report against apt-file, and block the bug against
packagesearch by the new one - close the bug against
packagesaerch as soon as the bug in apt-file is closed. This
option does
Hi,
On 2006-09-24 at 23:58:36 +0200, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On (24/09/06 18:43), Tobias Klauser wrote:
On 2006-09-24 at 17:19:13 +0200, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* You have missed the copyright info for inotify.h in
debian/copyright. There is also no
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 04:56:24PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
* remove useless ${misc:Depends} in debian/control.
It's not useless. See man 7 debhelper and search for Automatic
generation of miscellaneous dependencies.. I would myself remove
${misc:Depends} only if debhelper indeed did
Thanks for all your help Arjan, Thomas and Christoph. I have now found
out I needed to run lintian with the -cio argument, which helped a lot!
I now have a properly lintian clean package:
(Version 1.0.1 - I had to modify upstream to remove the executable tags!)
- URL:
I also had a closer look at your debconf template, and you are making an
assumption about the interface:
By selecting no
Some of the debconf frontends do not display a yes/no question but a
checkbox. You may get around this problem by using a neutral sentence,
such as If you do not choose
Christoph Haas wrote:
Regarding debian/patches/01_makefilefix.dpatch:
Wouldn't it be easier if you installed the files into the appropriate
locations using dh_install in debian/rules later? Patching the Makefile
looks a bit unusual to me.
That is a much better method, thanks.
s/pixer by
Kari Pahula wrote:
It's not useless.
it is, for this package. however, one can argue to let it in for not
need to add it when it becomes required in a later upstream version, but
i don't like that.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL
James Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] (25/09/2006):
Thanks for all your help Arjan, Thomas and Christoph. I have now found
out I needed to run lintian with the -cio argument, which helped a lot!
I now have a properly lintian clean package:
(Version 1.0.1 - I had to modify upstream to remove the
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote:
* This package is one of the four Debian binary packages that contain
Malaga version 4.3
^^^
Then it goes on to describe how the upstream sources for 4.3 were
downloaded in 1999. It's probably time to update this file. See
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote:
On (21/09/06 18:12), Timo Jyrinki wrote:
* Package name: suomi-malaga
Hi,
Hello, and about suomi-malaga next.
* Have you filed an ITP? If so you should close it in the changelog.
* Why does the source package go in section misc if it's only
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote:
* Package name: libvoikko
Changes in this package to address problems found by James:
libvoikko (1.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Complete ITP (Closes: #388293)
* Indent homepage by two spaces in debian/control
* Switch to
Hello,
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote:
* Package name: tmispell-voikko
I made a new release based on James's comments, and the changes are as
follows:
tmispell-voikko (0.6-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Complete ITP (Closes: #388802)
* Indent homepage by two spaces in
Hi everybody,
I dont know if its the right place for that kind of request. If no, Im
really sorry to pollute this mailing list. Im just join this mailing list
and Im looking for someone that need help for his project. If then, dont
hesitate and mail me.
Sorry for my poor
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:12:15 +0200, Thomas Huriaux wrote:
Last things from me:
* In your debian/templates file, you marked the Default: field as
translatable while it should not be (really easy to fix: just remove the
underscore in front of Default).
* The debconf-updatepo call should be
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote:
* Package name: oo2-voikko
(now openoffice.org-voikko)
* The copyright status of the upstream work seems unclear, I think you
should seek to clarify it.
Clarified, see changelog.
* The system of substrvars you have used is a little
At 1159102812 past the epoch, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
I have a bug which is not a bug in my package
(packagesearch). However, reassigning it to the package
that causes that bug (apt-file), would leave it no longer
visible for my package, and thus probably result in the
bug to be posted again.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marcus Better wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xml-im-exporter. This is
part of the JBoss packaging effort.
* Package name: xml-im-exporter
Hi Marcus,
Are you still looking for a sponsor to upload xml-im-exporter?
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Are you still looking for a sponsor to upload xml-im-exporter?
No, it's in the NEW queue.
Did you put it in pkg-java Alioth's subversion?
Yes.
Marcus
pgpBUSbzcwkc6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Are you still looking for a sponsor to upload xml-im-exporter?
I sponsored it a while ago, it's sitting in NEW.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:
Dear Philipp,
On 9/24/06, Philipp Frauenfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Muammar
Am Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 05:41:03PM -0400 hat Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez
getippert:
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Done.
Thank you :-)
Regards
Regards,
--
Muammar El
On (25/09/06 01:48), Francesco Namuri wrote:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:15:22PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
If copyright has been asserted on the file then it must be mentioned in
debian/rules, along with its distribution license. If there isn't one
you should find out what it is and add it,
On (23/09/06 13:36), Luca bedogni wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package webcam-server.
* Package name: webcam-server
I cannot sponsor the package for you but I have some comments on it.
* You have created a very strange package with all of the debian/
On (23/09/06 19:41), Kim Kuylen wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package personalbackup.
* Package name: personalbackup
Hi,
I cannot sponsor your package, but I have a few comments,
* The files you add to the upstream code can be shipped under debian/
I
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 07:41:06PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
On (25/09/06 01:48), Francesco Namuri wrote:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:15:22PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
If copyright has been asserted on the file then it must be mentioned in
debian/rules, along with its distribution
On (24/09/06 16:34), Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.50-1 of my package
libapp-info-perl.
Hi,
I cannot sponsor the package but I have reviewed it.
It looks very good in general. I do have a couple of minor points.
* Is there
James Westby wrote:
On (23/09/06 19:41), Kim Kuylen wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package personalbackup.
* Package name: personalbackup
Hi,
I cannot sponsor your package, but I have a few comments,
* The files you add to the upstream code can be
On (25/09/06 23:25), Kim Kuylen wrote:
James Westby wrote:
On (23/09/06 19:41), Kim Kuylen wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package personalbackup.
* The files you add to the upstream code can be shipped under debian/
I believe, making it clearer they are
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 10:32:29PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
* You ship an empty /tmp/ in the deb, please drop this.
Personalbackup depends on the existence of the /tmp folder...so is it ok
to just assume that it is always there ?
Other packages assume it is there I guess, but I
On (25/09/06 17:59), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
I dont know if its the right place for that kind of request. If no,
Im really sorry to pollute this mailing list. Im just join this mailing
list and Im looking for someone that need help for his project. If then,
On (25/09/06 12:11), James Stone wrote:
On Sunday 24 September 2006 11:39, James Stone wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tunapie.
Thanks for checking it out. I have made the above
addition to the copyright file (tunapie 1.0-5).
- URL:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.6-3
of my package gtksee.
It builds these binary packages:
gtksee - GTK-based clone of ACDSee (an image viewer)
The package is lintian clean.
The package can be found on
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:05:24 +0100
James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On (24/09/06 16:34), Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.50-1 of my package
libapp-info-perl.
Hi,
Hi James, pleased to meet you again:
I cannot
Am Sonntag, den 24.09.2006, 23:30 +0200 schrieb Daniel Baumann:
Daniel Leidert wrote:
I would like to know, how a binNMU can be requested?
by asking on -release.
Thanks.
Regards, Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
m.d.n still has version -4. So you wish to upload an updated version?
James
Don't know what happened, I had a .upload file but it was not on the
server. I have re-uploaded it now.
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On (25/09/06 23:34), James Stone wrote:
m.d.n still has version -4. So you wish to upload an updated version?
James
Don't know what happened, I had a .upload file but it was not on the
server. I have re-uploaded it now.
Thanks,
I cannot sponsor, but I have a few comments,
* It
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-17
of my package blacs-pvm.
It builds these binary packages:
blacs-pvm-dev - Basic Linear Algebra Comm. Subprograms - Dev. files for PVM
blacs-pvm-test - Basic Linear Algebra Comm. Subprograms - Test files for PVM
blacs1-pvm -
Dear mentors,
For one of the packages I created, the upstream sources I used were a
version 1.x accidentally released as version 2.0 on sourceforge. The
differences between the two versions are quite high, as the file formats
accepted in input have changed (some added, some removed).
I am
47 matches
Mail list logo
