On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openoffice.org-voikko
I guess you want to conflict against openoffice.org-soikko?
I did the change to 1.1-2 yesterday evening. I soon got a few notices that
multiple spellcheckers work in OOo just
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 11:10:58PM +0100, Jack Grahams wrote:
Thanks again for your help. I've uploaded it to mentors.debian.net.
Please let me know if it's suitable for sponsorship.
Well, IMHO it is. Just uploaded.
If you want to update your packaging any time in the future please
simply
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 07:41:06PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
On (25/09/06 01:48), Francesco Namuri wrote:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:15:22PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
If copyright has been asserted on the file then it must be mentioned in
debian/rules, along with its distribution
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 27. September 2006 08:22 schrieben Sie:
I did the change to 1.1-2 yesterday evening. I soon got a few notices that
multiple spellcheckers work in OOo just fine. What do you think? Of course
Right.
it's not maybe that wise to use more than one spellchecker for a language,
At 1158313616 past the epoch, Charles Plessy wrote:
EMBOSS is shipped and built with its own copy of libpcre.
As a result, the EMBOSS Debian package contains some files
wich are also in the libpcre Debian package, and they
conflict together.
Argh. Reading the -devel mesg you linked to, I take
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Right. But soikko/voikko are sufficiently similar (and soikko is unmaintained
upstream afaik
and non-free) so that it doesn't really make sense to install both soikko and
voikko?
[ and soikko could be removed if voikko is in the archive if no one
Le Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 11:10:34AM +0100, Jon Dowland a écrit :
At 1158313616 past the epoch, Charles Plessy wrote:
EMBOSS is shipped and built with its own copy of libpcre.
As a result, the EMBOSS Debian package contains some files
wich are also in the libpcre Debian package, and they
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:34:11 +0200
Nacho Barrientos Arias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.50-1 of my package
libapp-info-perl.
Sponsored, thanks to Ricardo Mones.
--
bye,
- Nacho
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hello,
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 11:10:34AM +0100, Jon Dowland a écrit :
At 1158313616 past the epoch, Charles Plessy wrote:
EMBOSS is shipped and built with its own copy of libpcre.
As a result, the EMBOSS Debian package contains some files
Hi!
I'm searching for a temporary sponsor for logwatch 7.3.1-2. It's
available from
http://pkg-logwatch.alioth.debian.org/apt/pool/main/l/logwatch/
I want to get 7.3.1 into etch, because the current 7.3-2 doesn't
properly support postfix 2.3 any more and reports some other lines
concerning logs
Sponsored.
Cheers,
tony
Willi Mann wrote:
Hi!
I'm searching for a temporary sponsor for logwatch 7.3.1-2. It's
available from
http://pkg-logwatch.alioth.debian.org/apt/pool/main/l/logwatch/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package php-xdebug.
* Package name: php-xdebug
Version : 1.99+2.0.0beta6-1
Upstream Author : Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.xdebug.org
* License : The Xdebug License, version 1.01 (Based on
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 10:42:21AM +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 07:41:06PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
On (25/09/06 01:48), Francesco Namuri wrote:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 11:15:22PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
If copyright has been asserted on the file then it
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gastman.
* Package name: gastman
Version : 1.0~rc1-1
Upstream Author : Mark Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://ftp.digium.com/pub/gastman/
* License : GPLv2
Section : comm
It builds these
Please consider joining [EMAIL PROTECTED]
where most pkg-voip related packages are maintained on a team basis.
The DDs on that list will happily sponsor the uploads for your package.
Regards.
El mié, 27-09-2006 a las 21:47 +0200, Lionel Porcheron escribió:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.2-1
of the package lusernet.app.
It builds these binary packages:
lusernet.app - News Reader for GNUstep
The package is lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 350435, 356531
It would also help the completion of the
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 06:26 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
What's upstream doing about it now? Are they releasing a 2.0.1 or 2.1 or 3
or something to replace that one, or are they just sticking with the V2
package? Again, what are upstream's plans? That will have a massive
bearing on what you
Yavor Doganov wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.2-1
of the package lusernet.app.
This package is maintained by Gurkan, and since he didn't orphan the
package, it would normally not be considered for an upload unless
there's an RC bug or as long as he is not MIA.
I'm his
Daniel Baumann wrote:
I think he will offer you co-maintainership, and if so, I'll sponsor the
upload if you want.
He already offered me (although not documented on a public ML/buglog),
and he's aware that I've been working with Sergey Golovin for the new
Pantomime stuff.
Gürkan, could you
Hi,
I hereby renew my request for sponsorship.
I have update the package after some remarks of James Westby and
Stephane Bortzmeyer and hope that someone is willing to upload it,
* Package name: frown
Version : 0.6.1-3
Upstream Author : Ralf Hinze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL
Le Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 08:20:15PM -0300, Leo Antunes a écrit :
If that's done then you're job's simple, repackage with the new version
and that's it. Make it as fast as possible though, since your users are
probably a bit confused by now... and if upstream takes a while to
release officially
Dear Mentors,
As I am preparing the upload a package which fixes a versioning mistake
(1.x uploaded as 2.0), I was wondering if it would make sense to set an
urgency higher than low so that the package migrates faster to
testing.
The package is very simple (one binary), and provides a functional
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:33:46AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 08:20:15PM -0300, Leo Antunes a écrit :
If that's done then you're job's simple, repackage with the new version
and that's it. Make it as fast as possible though, since your users are
probably a bit
Op do, 28-09-2006 te 10:06 +0900, schreef Charles Plessy:
Dear Mentors,
As I am preparing the upload a package which fixes a versioning mistake
(1.x uploaded as 2.0), I was wondering if it would make sense to set an
urgency higher than low so that the package migrates faster to
testing.
Le Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:20:43AM +0200, Arjan Oosting a écrit :
And also see a mail on devel-announce:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/07/msg8.html
Thank you, this is what I was looking for.
So If I understand correctly, although one could maybe consider that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:57:58 +0100, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On (25/09/06 19:01), holoturoide wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.6-3
of my package gtksee.
Hi, I cannot sponsor but I have some
Hi all,
My question is in the last paragraph of this email.
Progress note:
I am working on a port of gnome-app-install to Debian. This utility,
made by the folks at Canonical Inc. and Ubuntu, is like Synaptic, but
ten times easier to use.
It currently does the job but does not always quit
27 matches
Mail list logo
