On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Justin Pryzby wrote:
You will have to test with both sarge and etch dpkg (until after etch
releases). Colin Watson recently wrote [0] about one of the ssh bugs
and how this was complicated for him.
You have to include the logic in the preinst, since the prerm is for
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 09:43:04PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Marc Haber wrote:
I have a package with a bunch of configuration files that are managed
by my maintainer scripts and not by dpkg. I now need one of them
(a.conf) to vanish.
How do I do this in a clean
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 10:26:45PM +0100, Florent Rougon wrote:
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that acceptable? Or is there anything easier, more elegant, more
policy compliant?
I think it's the usual, and correct way (sometimes actually performed by
ucf, but since you're getting
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 10:28:41PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
You will have to test with both sarge and etch dpkg (until after etch
releases). Colin Watson recently wrote [0] about one of the ssh bugs
and how this was complicated for him.
You have to include the logic in the preinst, since
Hi all,
while working on proftpd backport I've been stumbling about the fact
that the proftpd package did not declare a build-dep on the libattr1-dev
package. The package is clearly needed if you're going to build it by
hand. I've been expecting the package to FTBFS on the buildds but the
opposite
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:58:33AM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
while working on proftpd backport I've been stumbling about the fact
that the proftpd package did not declare a build-dep on the libattr1-dev
package. The package is clearly needed if you're going to build it by
hand. I've been
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:05:55AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:58:33AM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
while working on proftpd backport I've been stumbling about the fact
that the proftpd package did not declare a build-dep on the libattr1-dev
package. The package
And isn't it a good idea to declare a build-dep even in this case?
proftpd would FTBS if libacl1-dev would drop its dependency on libattr1-dev.
Is there a commonly accepted rule on these particular cases?
There is. If the package directly depends on libattr1-dev (this usually
means it
Hi Philippe,
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 00:35 +0100, Philippe Coval wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package whitedune.
Thank you for your work. I've taken a look.
I've got the following comments:
debian/changelog:
* The changelog mentions two previous versions from 2002, but I can't
Hi Kumar,
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 20:47 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Now, I would like to know how to bail the package out of this
situation. Do I try to fix the problem, referring it to upstream, or
is it that I should somehow block this architecture now and keep my
fingers crossed hoping it
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 12:52:29PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
So, check whether upstream can solve it and/or tag the bug 'help' and
send a mail to the relevant porters list.
Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I shall act accordingly.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
462, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package sshproxy.
* Package name: sshproxy
Version : 0.5.1
Upstream Author : David Guerizec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://penguin.fr/sshproxy/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: Python
Description :
Hi Bernat,
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 14:38 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package sshproxy.
There is currently one bug in the package due to a problem in cdbs :
bug #386970. I don't know wthat the correct work around is.
I'm sorry, I can't help you with this.
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 10:47:16 +0100, Marc Haber
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Yes, that sounds sensible. It is, however, frustrating that there is
no method (for example, offered by ucf) to do this without that much
coding in maintainer scripts.
This is the beauty of fre software. If you
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du samedi 20 janvier 2007, vers
14:52, Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
The package is almost lintian free. I have put an override for INSTALL
which contains post-setup instructions.
Maybe it makes sense to move these instructions to a file
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:31:11AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
This is the beauty of fre software. If you find it so
frustrating, write up a generic tool, and contribute it. And that
would follow the grand old UNIX tradition of each command doing one
thing well.
The task at hand
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
I have come across an unexpected (serious), bug in my package libitpp,
that it doesn't build on s390. Check http://bugs.debian.org/407555
[snip]
Besides, I don't have access to such a machine!
You can emulate an s390 using the package Hercules.
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:17:27 +0100, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:31:11AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
This is the beauty of fre software. If you find it so frustrating,
write up a generic tool, and contribute it. And that would follow
the grand old UNIX
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 11:38:39AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:17:27 +0100, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 10:31:11AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
This is the beauty of fre software. If you find it so frustrating,
write up a generic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Vinvent,
Kust a tiny little comment:
- -=| Vincent Bernat, 20.01.2007 15:38 |=-
It builds these binary packages:
sshproxy - ssh gateway to apply ACLs on ssh connections
sshproxy-backend-mysql - ssh gateway to apply ACLs on ssh connections
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The file is under ucf control (I omitted that to lessen complexity),
Hey! We are doctors. You have to tell us _everything_. :-)
but ucf does not know about the file any more if it is not in the new
package and will therefore not handle it.
Uh, if you
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:46:20 +0100, Marc Haber
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 11:38:39AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:17:27 +0100, Marc Haber
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
There is no need to fork ucf to create a command that provides
functionality not
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du samedi 20 janvier 2007, vers 18:53,
Damyan Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
-=| Vincent Bernat, 20.01.2007 15:38 |=-
It builds these binary packages:
sshproxy - ssh gateway to apply ACLs on ssh connections
sshproxy-backend-mysql - ssh gateway to apply ACLs
Dear fellow mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.73-3 of my package
libphp-phpmailer.
This package is already in the archives. I am simply taking over
maintainer responsibilities.
It builds these binary packages:
libphp-phpmailer - full featured email transfer class for
uploaded.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -=| Vincent Bernat, 20.01.2007 21:23 |=-
But I get the point and fixed this problem by not using dh_installinit
and invoking rc.d by hand.
Strange. dh_installinit works for me every time. I don't use cdbs,
however so I guess my case is not the
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 11:54:28AM +0100, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
And isn't it a good idea to declare a build-dep even in this case?
proftpd would FTBS if libacl1-dev would drop its dependency on libattr1-dev.
Is there a commonly accepted rule on these particular cases?
There is.
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du samedi 20 janvier 2007, vers
22:47, Damyan Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
But I get the point and fixed this problem by not using dh_installinit
and invoking rc.d by hand.
Strange. dh_installinit works for me every time. I don't use cdbs,
however
There lives more faith in honest doubt, Believe me, than in half the creeds.
Cplassy Suexy TRMANSEXUAL Smhowing Her Btooty In Bvedroom
http://only.lakapaj.com/
Know-how will surpass guess-how.Genius is an infinite capacity for taking
pains.Falling out of love is chiefly a matter of forgetting
29 matches
Mail list logo
