On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:41:49PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-=| Mike Hommey, Thu, 24 May 2007 19:39:20 +0200 |=-
A standard example of this are bugs in applications that are due to
bugs in libraries they depend on. Users would report bugs on the
application, but it
-=| Mike Hommey, Fri, 25 May 2007 08:12:15 +0200 |=-
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:41:49PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-=| Mike Hommey, Thu, 24 May 2007 19:39:20 +0200 |=-
A standard example of this are bugs in applications that are due
to bugs in libraries they depend on.
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:18:19AM +0300, Damyan Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-=| Mike Hommey, Fri, 25 May 2007 08:12:15 +0200 |=-
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:41:49PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-=| Mike Hommey, Thu, 24 May 2007 19:39:20 +0200 |=-
A standard
On 24 May 2007 16:38:58 -0700
Robert J. Clay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But what about closed ones? The package I've started on
(Fidogate) had 9 bugs against it; 8 of them closed by it being
removed from the Debian archive.If they were still open, then
most if not all would be
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package lj2mail.
* Package name : lj2mail
Version : 0.0.145
Upstream Author : Alexey Alexandrov
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/lj2mail/
* License : GPL
Section : net
It builds these binary packages:
lj2mail - livejournal friendlist update
Dear Mentors,
I've created a package, emboss-explorer, part of the Debian-Med and
Pkg-Emboss projects. It works, but I'd like a review to be sure it will
work on an out-of-the-box Debian installation.
You can get the package at:
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 12:04:16AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
Doesn't that fuck up versioning tracking of the BTS ?
No, because the bug should only be found in B, not A.
So how would it help users with reportbug if the bug is now on B and not A,
when they report on A ?
Mike
--
To
On Fri, 25 May 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 12:04:16AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
Doesn't that fuck up versioning tracking of the BTS ?
No, because the bug should only be found in B, not A.
So how would it help users with reportbug if the bug is now on B and not A,
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:59:31PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
[added the list again]
-=| Giorgio Pioda, Thu, 24 May 2007 21:11:19 +0200 |=-
If I were you, I'd try to make make install not strip anything,
patching if necessary[1]. The problem with dh_install approach is
that you have to
Hello Paul and Damyan
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:59:31PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
[added the list again]
-=| Giorgio Pioda, Thu, 24 May 2007 21:11:19 +0200 |=-
If I were you, I'd try to make make install not strip anything,
patching if necessary[1]. The problem with dh_install approach is
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 05:36:34PM +0200, Giorgio Pioda wrote:
Hello Paul and Damyan
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:59:31PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
[added the list again]
-=| Giorgio Pioda, Thu, 24 May 2007 21:11:19 +0200 |=-
If I were you, I'd try to make make install not strip
Hello Don,
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Jörg Sommer wrote:
I really would like to hear you oppinion about the following matter:
Package A depends on libB. There's a bug in libB. A bug report was files
to package A, because the submitter spotted the bug in
* David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-25 10:25:12 +0200]:
Dear Mentors,
I've created a package, emboss-explorer, part of the Debian-Med and
Pkg-Emboss projects. It works, but I'd like a review to be sure it will
work on an out-of-the-box Debian installation.
You can get the package
Oleksandr Moskalenko ha scritto:
Well, for starters the build-depends don't seem to be complete as the build
fails:
...
MakeMaker FATAL: prerequisites not found (Mail::Send not installed)
...
I've fixed it, thanks.
Bad habit of not using pdebuild -.-'
Any other issue?
Thanks,
David
--
Thanks to Piotr and Matthew for replying. I'll change the bug to ITA now.
Richard Fearn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Mentors,
I've created a 'deb' package called 'lbadmin', an administration tool for
load balancing and high availability clusters.
All problems solved, except the following when running lintian:
E: lbadmin: package-contains-xvpics-dir var/www/lbadmin-1.0/images/.xvpics/
I've searched the
Hi Damyan
I probably right now have understood what is going on...
Damyan Ivanov ha scritto:
-=| Paul Elliott, Fri, 25 May 2007 11:32:02 -0500 |=-
OK, but first let me understand what I am fixing. What is wrong
with make install as it is? There is also a make install-strip.
I did not do
Hello,
On 5/24/07, Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's no reason to upload unless there's a change to the package
needed
OK, that's what I thought.
That said, you should be subscribed to the PTS for the package, and
should make an upload as soon as there is something to fix, even
-=| Paul Elliott, Fri, 25 May 2007 11:32:02 -0500 |=-
OK, but first let me understand what I am fixing. What is wrong
with make install as it is? There is also a make install-strip.
I did not do anything special to create these targets; auto* tools
created them. What exactly is wrong with make
-=| Giorgio Pioda, Fri, 25 May 2007 21:29:40 +0200 |=-
http://web.ticino.com/gfwp/debian/peless-1.108/peless_1.108-1.dsc
Ouch. It seems I've missed something in my previous review :/
In debian/copyright it is written that peless is under GPLv2-or-later
and this is in COPYING as well.
However,
* Bas Wijnen:
This is slightly off-topic, for which I apologise. It's just that I
learned about symbol versioning during my NM process, and nobody outside
Debian seems to understand what it is. :-(
*sigh* It's a bit sad that this is still being used in the NM process.
I have a library,
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:55:11PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
-=| Giorgio Pioda, Fri, 25 May 2007 21:29:40 +0200 |=-
http://web.ticino.com/gfwp/debian/peless-1.108/peless_1.108-1.dsc
Ouch. It seems I've missed something in my previous review :/
In debian/copyright it is written that
On 2007-05-25, Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Bas Wijnen:
This is slightly off-topic, for which I apologise. It's just that I
learned about symbol versioning during my NM process, and nobody outside
Debian seems to understand what it is. :-(
*sigh* It's a bit sad that this is
On Fri, 25 May 2007 15:28:17 -0500
Paul Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will probably make a release probably Sat or Sun.
It will take this long because I still have to verify that the
system still builds on Fedora, opensuse, mandrake and ubuntu 7.04.
I still do not have a debian sid
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:57:41PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
This is slightly off-topic, for which I apologise. It's just that I
learned about symbol versioning during my NM process, and nobody outside
Debian seems to understand what it is. :-(
*sigh* It's a bit sad that this is still
Hi,
The docbook-xml package 4.4 shipped a really old version 3.1.7, that was
dropped with package version 4.5. The package itself ships a
configuration file for every released version:
[..]
/etc
/etc/sgml
/etc/sgml/docbook-xml
/etc/sgml/docbook-xml/3.1.7
/etc/sgml/docbook-xml/3.1.7/dbgenent.ent
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 05:03:42PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
I have a library, which I want to package for Debian. I felt it would
be a good idea to use symbol versioning, since most of my programs (and
in some cases other libraries) use it. The library is written in C++,
which seems to be
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 04:08:32AM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Hi,
The docbook-xml package 4.4 shipped a really old version 3.1.7, that was
dropped with package version 4.5. The package itself ships a
configuration file for every released version:
[ Note: Is it a conffile. ]
[..]
/etc
28 matches
Mail list logo
