RFS: secpanel (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.2-1 of my package secpanel. It builds these binary packages: secpanel - A graphical user interface for SSH and SCP The upload would fix these bugs: 305135, 317063 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL:

debian-mentors FAQ updated

Finally, after much delay, I've got a new version of the FAQ uploaded to it's usual place at http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html . Updates in this release: * Add a comment about telling everyone you got sponsored to reduce duplication of effort. (Christoph Haas) *

dpkg-buildpackage and fakeroot

Hi all Can someone please tell me the difference between dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot Which one should I use for building packages in Debian? thanks raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/

Re: dpkg-buildpackage and fakeroot

Hi, * Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-07-10 20:22]: Can someone please tell me the difference between dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage In this case the two are equivalent I think (apart from the process perspective). But you can use other programs

Re: dpkg-buildpackage and fakeroot

On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 14:19 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: Hi all Can someone please tell me the difference between dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot dpkg-buildpackage uses fakeroot when being a normal user doesn't suffice. fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage dpkg-buildpackage is run 100% in

Re: dpkg-buildpackage and fakeroot

On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 02:19:35PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: Hi all Can someone please tell me the difference between dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot Which one should I use for building packages in Debian?

LiDIA: How to split up a library?

I want to package LiDIA, a very featureful C++ library for computational number theory that at one time had the best algorithms for elliptic curve cryptography available anywhere: http://www.cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/TI/LiDIA/ I know that as a packaging newbie I'm discouraged from

Re: LiDIA: How to split up a library?

Hi, I want to package LiDIA, a very featureful C++ library for computational number theory that at one time had the best algorithms for elliptic curve cryptography available anywhere: http://www.cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/TI/LiDIA/ I know that as a packaging newbie I'm

ITA: debnest -- Nested Build System of Debian Source Package

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Package: debnest Binary: debnest Version: 0.0.10 Priority: optional Section: devel Maintainer: Masato Taruishi [EMAIL PROTECTED] New Maintainer: Deepak Tripathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper ( 4.0.0) Architecture: all Standards-Version: 3.6.0

ITA: debnest -- Nested Build System of Debian Source Package

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Package: debian-builder Priority: optional Section: admin Installed-Size: 136 Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] New Maintainer: Deepak Tripathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: all Version: 1.6 Depends: perl, perl-modules, build-essential, devscripts,

ITA: debian-builder

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Package: debian-builder Priority: optional Section: admin Installed-Size: 136 Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] New Maintainer: Deepak Tripathi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: all Version: 1.6 Depends: perl, perl-modules, build-essential, devscripts,

Re: RFS: Spout, a tiny but wonderful black and white game (ITP with Bug#356492)

Damyan, Thanks so much for answering, and thanks especially for agreeing to work with me on the package. Here are my answers to your requests. I have taken some time in replying to your email because I wanted to finish everything first. I am wiling to sponsor this game, but there are some