Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.11-1
of my package sbox-dtc.
It builds these binary packages:
sbox-dtc - A CGI wrapper script for chrooted environment for hosting
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 431673 429072
Also, the
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.0-1
of my package dtc-xen.
It builds these binary packages:
dtc-xen - SOAP daemon and scripts to allow control panel management for
Xen VMs
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs (many are
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.26.2-1
of my package dtc.
It builds these binary packages:
dtc - web control panel for admin and accounting hosting services
dtc-package-installer - Adds package installer apps to DTC
dtc-stats-daemon - dtc-xen VM statistics for the
Hi Kel,
Thanks a lot for your time.
[ btrfs packages ]
Had a quick look, some comments:
* these also need to be removed by upstream's clean target:
.*.o.cmd
.tmp_versions/
Module.symvers
Will pass that on to upstream.
* btrfs-modules-source should have a versioned dependency on
Sorry, I just post 3 requests with the same subject. Please have a look
in the body of the message.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Damyan Ivanov wrote:
-=| Javier Candeira, Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:37:08 +1000 |=-
Damyan, Thanks so much for answering, and thanks especially for
agreeing to work with me on the package.
Work is a bit strong :) I'll just review/upload. You are supposed to
do the work :)
Thanks for reviewing
Adrian von Bidder wrote:
http://fortytwo.ch/debian/btrfs
if you want them, in future, integrated into l-m-e-2.6, you have to name
your package 'foo-source', not 'foo-modules'-source.
also, you should not depend on 'linux-image-_KVERS_', but on
'linux-modules-_KVERS_ | linux-image-_KVERS_'.
--
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 06:33:47 pm Adrian von Bidder wrote:
Hi Kel,
Thanks a lot for your time.
[ btrfs packages ]
Had a quick look, some comments:
* these also need to be removed by upstream's clean target:
.*.o.cmd
.tmp_versions/
Module.symvers
Will pass that on to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.02-4
of my package libapache2-authenntlm-perl.
It builds these binary packages:
libapache2-authenntlm-perl - Perform Microsoft NTLM and Basic User
Authentication
The package appears
In my last update of the FAQ, I forgot to include a substantial rework of
the difference between native and non-native packages from Thijs Kinkhorst.
The rework also split the discussion on why debian dirs in upstream tarballs
is bad, which should help in the future when people ask about it --
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.61.7-1
of my package mailscanner.
It builds these binary packages:
mailscanner - email virus scanner and spam tagger
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 412883, 425861, 429954
The package can
I just joined this list (although I haven't packaged anything yet, etc. I
fully intend to). Thus, I haven't been following this discussion.
Any chance you could provide a link to the page about why debian dirs in
upstream tarballs is bad?
Curiosity kills the cat, every time...
Thanks!
Hi,
On 12/07/07, Jack T Mudge III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just joined this list (although I haven't packaged anything yet, etc. I
fully intend to). Thus, I haven't been following this discussion.
Any chance you could provide a link to the page about why debian dirs in
upstream tarballs is
On 12/07/07 at 19:26 +0200, Simon Walter wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.61.7-1
of my package mailscanner.
It builds these binary packages:
mailscanner - email virus scanner and spam tagger
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload
On 10/07/07, Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So a good place for the library [LiDIA] and hopefully a team which could help
you would be the the Debian science team
Thanks, I'll try them.
- Jordi G. H.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor for the new version of my two packages:
- lwatch 0.4.1-2
- rrdcollect 0.2.3-3
Packages are lintian and linda clean. There are some small bugfixes
(#348434, #424562) and updates to current standard version.
Packages are available on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
[cc: me please, or I will break proper threading again]
[Daniel]
if you want them, in future, integrated into l-m-e-2.6, you have to name
your package 'foo-source', not 'foo-modules'-source.
Ok. Not sure if the package should be part of l-m-e, though. I'd not want
anybody to use btrfs
17 matches
Mail list logo
