Gudjon I. Gudjonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway, even if the licenses aren't long it would be easier if they
were standardised with well documented relations to the other
licenses. A single word may change the meaning of the license and it
is difficult to know the consequenses.
I just tried to package a new upstream release of QtOctave. It seems
that I made a Lintian mistake, and I'm not sure how to fix it. I think
the problem is that somehow icons.tar ended up in the toplevel dir,
but I don't know how they got there. I might have a mistake in one of
the CMakeLists.txt
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3-1
of my package grub-choose-default.
It builds these binary packages:
grub-choose-default - Control Grub Default through a GUI
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9-1
of my package parcellite.
It's a new upstream release with only trivial changes
in the debian/
It builds these binary packages:
parcellite - A lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The
Hello Jonathan,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 21:22, Jonathan Wiltshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sandro
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 05:33:57PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
ehm, I personally like to have all the changes in the revision =
current revision in debian+1, so -6, and you have the opportunity
Hello Andrew,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 15:27, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9-1
of my package parcellite.
- you can remove 'A ' from short description, since it has to be a
noun phrase.
- you should add a debian/README.source to
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 04:59:56PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
When you upload a package to ftp-master, there are 2 possibilities,
it's ACCEPTED (hence included in the debian archive) or it's REJECTED.
In the latter case, you can reupload the same revision, since from
archice POV that revision
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- you can remove 'A ' from short description, since it has to be a
noun phrase.
- you should add a debian/README.source to inform that this package
uses quilt as patch system.
Apart from those simple points (you can fix
Hi Jordi
Your lintian error points out that the file src/.pc/.version is modified
(actually created) in the diff.gz . The .pc/.version dir is most likely created
by an editor on another program while changing the package; you should simply
get rid of that file and re-pack.
Cheers,
Andreas
--
2008/11/27 Andreas Wenning [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Your lintian error points out that the file src/.pc/.version is modified
(actually created) in the diff.gz . The .pc/.version dir is most likely
created
by an editor on another program while changing the package; you should simply
get rid of that
Hi Jordi
Not a DD myself, so probably a good idea to count on Rafael for sponsoring.
I originally made the changes to the package including the icons.tar.uu, so
just thought I might help out if it was a problem regarding that.
Cheers,
Andreas
--
,-¤. Kubuntu Linux
¤;
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package jigzo.
* Package name: jigzo
Version : 0.6.1-1
Upstream Author : Elías Alejandro Año Mendoza
* URL : http://www.resorama.com/jigzo
* License : GPL-v2
Section : games
It builds these binary packages:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 17:53, Jonathan Wiltshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 04:59:56PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
mh, distclean is not a target of debian/rules; what I suggest is using
something like
clean: clean-patched unpatch
clean-patched: patch-stamp
do the real
there is a config.log file left in diff.gz, please remove it in the
next upload (probably before the 'rm' in config), but apart from that
the package looks fine so I uploaded it.
I spotted that in lintian, but as far as I could find out it's normal
if the file gets removed in the clean target
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 20:07, Jonathan Wiltshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there is a config.log file left in diff.gz, please remove it in the
next upload (probably before the 'rm' in config), but apart from that
the package looks fine so I uploaded it.
I spotted that in lintian, but as far
No, it's not normal: if that files was removed in clean target, then
it would never have come out in .diff.gz; moreover, config.log is not
removed in clean, but in build-stamp target.
My bad; I'll fix it in next package.
Thanks for the upload!
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus,
On Tuesday 25 November 2008 19:21:46 Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think it is severe enough to be put forward for lenny?
I'm not sure. The patch looks straight-forward enough, so perhaps the
release team would approve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I just upload on mentors.debian.net a new version of the package with
several update according to previous comments. You could find below my
answers/explanation for each comment.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- - URL:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:14:56PM +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote:
Michal ??iha?? a écrit :
Hi
[...]
Quick look at the package:
- any reason why it is Architecture: i386?
In reason of the libraries dependency.
libnet1 package is for i386 architecture and dhcp_probe use it
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package l7-filter-userspace.
* Package name: l7-filter-userspace
Version : 0.10-1
Upstream Author : Ethan Sommer, Matthew Strait
* URL : http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPLv2+
Section : net
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package l7-protocols.
* Package name: l7-protocols
Version : 20081123-1
Upstream Author : M. Strait [EMAIL PROTECTED], E. Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPLv2 and
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package kde-style-skulpture.
* Package name: kde-style-skulpture
Version : 0.2.0-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
* License : [fill in]
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Richard Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-style-skulpture/kde-style-skulpture_0.2.0-1.dsc
I'm not a KDE persion, but why do you embed parts of CDBS/debhelper in
the source package?
Please also add
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-style-skulpture/kde-style-skulpture_0.2.0-1.dsc
I'm not a KDE persion, but why do you embed parts of CDBS/debhelper in
the source package?
The reason for this is so KDE 3
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.17.0+20061110-3
of my package xli.
It builds these binary packages:
xli- command line tool for viewing images in X11
The upload would fix these bugs: 431760, 471121
I'm intending on getting it into Lenny, so only minimal
Hi
Most of things were already answered in Matthews reply, I only react on
missing things.
Dne Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:14:56 +0100
Laurent Guignard [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a):
- debian/rules:
- rm -f can not fail, so you can strip some useless test commands
- test ! -f Makefile ||
Hi
Dne Thu, 27 Nov 2008 23:22:51 -0800
Ryan Niebur [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a):
I'm intending on getting it into Lenny, so only minimal changes. It
fixes an RC bug (#471121) and I am adopting the package.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
27 matches
Mail list logo
