Hello Jonathan,
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 03:15, Jonathan Wiltshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there is a config.log file left in diff.gz, please remove it in the
next upload (probably before the 'rm' in config), but apart from that
the package looks fine so I uploaded it.
Fixed this in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michal Čihař a écrit :
Hi
Most of things were already answered in Matthews reply, I only react on
missing things.
Dne Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:14:56 +0100
Laurent Guignard [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a):
- debian/rules:
- rm -f can not fail,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Matthew Palmer a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:14:56PM +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote:
Michal ??iha?? a écrit :
Hi
[...]
Quick look at the package:
- any reason why it is Architecture: i386?
In reason of the libraries dependency.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package inkscape-textext.
* Package name: inkscape-textext
Version : 0.4.4-1
* Upstream Author : Pauli Virtanen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.elisanet.fi/ptvirtan/software/textext/
* License : BSD
Section
Salvatore Bonaccorso scrisse:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package inkscape-textext.
inkscape-textext - Inkscape extension for editable LaTeX text or
formula
I'm not really in favor of this ITP, as it mainly seems as a
wring reaction to the latex extension not working
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:37:25 +0100
Laurent Guignard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought it was a cleaner method to test the file exists before
running a command on, but may be i am wrong ?
The test is okay, but why do you invoke debian/rules? If you need
config.status to be up to date,
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:37:48 +0100
Laurent Guignard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have another question about architecture :
How is it possible to check if a package could be built on
architecture without the appropriate hardware ?
As long as all the dependencies exist on all the available
Dear Luca
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 03:18:43PM +0100, Luca Bruno wrote:
Salvatore Bonaccorso scrisse:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package inkscape-textext.
inkscape-textext - Inkscape extension for editable LaTeX text or
formula
I'm not really in favor of this
[ Please reply to -mentors at least ]
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:37 PM, S'orlok Reaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have split libwaitzar off from scim-waitzar and built a separate package:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scim-waitzar/
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 21:31 +0200, George Danchev wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2008 17:27:16 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Change: added patch 05_segfault_params.dpatch and included it in
00list.
Closes: LP #301041
Helping Ubuntu folks is also very nice, and to be honest I was not aware of
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package librcd.
Package name: librcd
Version : 0.1.11-2
Upstream Author : Suren A. Chilingaryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL : http://rusxmms.sourceforge.net/
License : GPL
Section : libs
It builds these binary
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package librcc.
Package name: librcc
Version : 0.2.6-2
Upstream Author : Suren A. Chilingaryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL : http://rusxmms.sourceforge.net/
License : GPL
Section : libs
It builds these binary
Hi,
2008/11/27 Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
[...]
debian/uupdate-wrapper:
| gzip xinha_$version.orig.tar.gz
use max compression (a.k.a -9)
Done
But looks like you didn't re-compress the tarball using -9, please do.
it is done now. But doesn't save much space.
[...]
Salvatore Bonaccorso scrisse:
First, before I also answer to your other paragraphs: do you think,
there is a change that the patch found in launchpad bugtracker (See
Bugreport #506285) can go into the inkscape package? This will render
back again the LaTeX formula rendering for 0.46 again. It
I'm no legal genius, but it looks fairly benign. Basically it says, as
long as you give us credit for the code, you can do whatever you want
with it.
- Lawrence
Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
Hi,
I would like to ask if a software that contains a file with this:
Hi altogether!
[...snip...]
I'm not really in favor of this ITP, as it mainly seems as a
wring reaction to the latex extension not working properly.
Many thanks for your reaction on this! Indeed yes, you are right, it
was a porbably to fast reaction. I will so the sponsoring request on
из того что вижу при проверке:
1. на все новые пакеты должны быть написаны ITP, тебе явно lintian ругается
на это:
* Initial release (Closes: #) is the bug number of your ITP
тут вместо #nnn должен быть номер ITP
2. если идет аплоад нового пакета в changes должны быть все записи
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 02:32:22PM +, James Westby wrote:
Just to note that the above doesn't quite match the syntax required
to auto-close the bug, it needs a colon after the LP. For those that
read perl the expression is
In the changelog the syntax was correct and the bug has been
sorry, mistake in To address :)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7.dfsg-5
of my package mina.
It builds these binary packages:
libmina-java - Java network application framework
libmina-java-doc - Java network application framework - documentation
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The
Le samedi 29 novembre 2008 20:58:49 Vincent Fourmond, vous avez écrit :
Hello,
Hi,
I'll take care of it.
Thanks !
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7.dfsg-5
of my package mina.
It builds these binary packages:
libmina-java - Java
Hello,
I'll take care of it.
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7.dfsg-5
of my package mina.
It builds these binary packages:
libmina-java - Java network application framework
libmina-java-doc - Java network application framework -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Williams a écrit :
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:37:48 +0100
Laurent Guignard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have another question about architecture :
How is it possible to check if a package could be built on
architecture without the appropriate
[...]
On the upstream README file, Irwin said that :
This version runs on Solaris 9 on SPARC, compiled with gcc.
So for me, dhcp-probe could be built on this platform.
I haven't any possibility to test the package on this type of
architecture and i haven't any assigned sponsor too.
If
Hello,
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
Moving example source code to -doc package seems a rational suggest to me.
I've just uploaded a new version including this change to mentors (same
debian
revision).
On its way ;-)
Cheers,
Vincent
--
The moon was high now, in a sky as
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 01:37:48PM +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote:
I have another question about architecture :
How is it possible to check if a package could be built on architecture
without the appropriate hardware ?
I can say that dhcp-probe could be build on i386 and any compatible
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:38:53 +0100
Laurent Guignard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has to build on sparc, you are required to ensure that it does by
fixing any FTBFS bugs that appear and those will provide a lot of
the information you need to fix the bug. In that case, your sponsor
can help
Luca Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED] (28/11/2008):
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Taken care of after some modifications.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 01:26:16AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Luca Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED] (28/11/2008):
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Taken care of after some modifications.
Thanks very much for uploading my package.
--
http://syx.googlecode.com -
Thanks for your review; I will address all of your points in turn later. At
present, though, there is one in particular I'd like to clarify:
Personally I would expect /usr/include/waitzar-1.0/waitzar
to be /usr/include/waitzar, since it is that way for most packages.
Same for the pkgconfig
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.2-3
of my package basic256.
It builds these binary packages:
basic256 - educational BASIC programming environment for children
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
31 matches
Mail list logo