Re: RFS: webcpp (adoption, bugfix and standards/dh7)

2008-11-29 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello Jonathan, On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 03:15, Jonathan Wiltshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: there is a config.log file left in diff.gz, please remove it in the next upload (probably before the 'rm' in config), but apart from that the package looks fine so I uploaded it. Fixed this in

Re: RFS: dhcp-probe, another try to request with a lot of update

2008-11-29 Thread Laurent Guignard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michal Čihař a écrit : Hi Most of things were already answered in Matthews reply, I only react on missing things. Dne Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:14:56 +0100 Laurent Guignard [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a): - debian/rules: - rm -f can not fail,

Re: RFS: dhcp-probe, another try to request with a lot of update

2008-11-29 Thread Laurent Guignard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Matthew Palmer a écrit : On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:14:56PM +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote: Michal ??iha?? a écrit : Hi [...] Quick look at the package: - any reason why it is Architecture: i386? In reason of the libraries dependency.

RFS: inkscape-textext

2008-11-29 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package inkscape-textext. * Package name: inkscape-textext Version : 0.4.4-1 * Upstream Author : Pauli Virtanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.elisanet.fi/ptvirtan/software/textext/ * License : BSD Section

Re: RFS: inkscape-textext

2008-11-29 Thread Luca Bruno
Salvatore Bonaccorso scrisse: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package inkscape-textext. inkscape-textext - Inkscape extension for editable LaTeX text or formula I'm not really in favor of this ITP, as it mainly seems as a wring reaction to the latex extension not working

Re: RFS: dhcp-probe, another try to request with a lot of update

2008-11-29 Thread Neil Williams
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:37:25 +0100 Laurent Guignard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought it was a cleaner method to test the file exists before running a command on, but may be i am wrong ? The test is okay, but why do you invoke debian/rules? If you need config.status to be up to date,

Re: RFS: dhcp-probe, another try to request with a lot of update

2008-11-29 Thread Neil Williams
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:37:48 +0100 Laurent Guignard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have another question about architecture : How is it possible to check if a package could be built on architecture without the appropriate hardware ? As long as all the dependencies exist on all the available

Re: RFS: inkscape-textext

2008-11-29 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Dear Luca On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 03:18:43PM +0100, Luca Bruno wrote: Salvatore Bonaccorso scrisse: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package inkscape-textext. inkscape-textext - Inkscape extension for editable LaTeX text or formula I'm not really in favor of this

Re: RFS: scim-waitzar, libwaitzar (re-submission) Attn: Paul Wise

2008-11-29 Thread Paul Wise
[ Please reply to -mentors at least ] On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:37 PM, S'orlok Reaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have split libwaitzar off from scim-waitzar and built a separate package: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scim-waitzar/

Re: RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

2008-11-29 Thread James Westby
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 21:31 +0200, George Danchev wrote: On Monday 24 November 2008 17:27:16 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Change: added patch 05_segfault_params.dpatch and included it in 00list. Closes: LP #301041 Helping Ubuntu folks is also very nice, and to be honest I was not aware of

RFS: librcd

2008-11-29 Thread ivan
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package librcd. Package name: librcd Version : 0.1.11-2 Upstream Author : Suren A. Chilingaryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : http://rusxmms.sourceforge.net/ License : GPL Section : libs It builds these binary

RFS: librcc

2008-11-29 Thread ivan
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package librcc. Package name: librcc Version : 0.2.6-2 Upstream Author : Suren A. Chilingaryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : http://rusxmms.sourceforge.net/ License : GPL Section : libs It builds these binary

Re: Re: RFS: xinha

2008-11-29 Thread Mathieu Parent
Hi, 2008/11/27 Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, [...] debian/uupdate-wrapper: | gzip xinha_$version.orig.tar.gz use max compression (a.k.a -9) Done But looks like you didn't re-compress the tarball using -9, please do. it is done now. But doesn't save much space. [...]

Re: RFS: inkscape-textext

2008-11-29 Thread Luca Bruno
Salvatore Bonaccorso scrisse: First, before I also answer to your other paragraphs: do you think, there is a change that the patch found in launchpad bugtracker (See Bugreport #506285) can go into the inkscape package? This will render back again the LaTeX formula rendering for 0.46 again. It

Re: A little question of a license

2008-11-29 Thread Lawrence Williams
I'm no legal genius, but it looks fairly benign. Basically it says, as long as you give us credit for the code, you can do whatever you want with it. - Lawrence Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: Hi, I would like to ask if a software that contains a file with this:

Re: Bug#500769: RFS: inkscape-textext

2008-11-29 Thread Wolfram Quester
Hi altogether! [...snip...] I'm not really in favor of this ITP, as it mainly seems as a wring reaction to the latex extension not working properly. Many thanks for your reaction on this! Indeed yes, you are right, it was a porbably to fast reaction. I will so the sponsoring request on

Re: RFS: librcc

2008-11-29 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
из того что вижу при проверке: 1. на все новые пакеты должны быть написаны ITP, тебе явно lintian ругается на это: * Initial release (Closes: #) is the bug number of your ITP тут вместо #nnn должен быть номер ITP 2. если идет аплоад нового пакета в changes должны быть все записи

Re: RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

2008-11-29 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 02:32:22PM +, James Westby wrote: Just to note that the above doesn't quite match the syntax required to auto-close the bug, it needs a colon after the LP. For those that read perl the expression is In the changelog the syntax was correct and the bug has been

Re: RFS: librcc

2008-11-29 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
sorry, mistake in To address :) signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: mina (updated package)

2008-11-29 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7.dfsg-5 of my package mina. It builds these binary packages: libmina-java - Java network application framework libmina-java-doc - Java network application framework - documentation The package appears to be lintian clean. The

Re: RFS: mina (updated package)

2008-11-29 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Le samedi 29 novembre 2008 20:58:49 Vincent Fourmond, vous avez écrit : Hello, Hi, I'll take care of it. Thanks ! Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7.dfsg-5 of my package mina. It builds these binary packages: libmina-java - Java

Re: RFS: mina (updated package)

2008-11-29 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello, I'll take care of it. Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7.dfsg-5 of my package mina. It builds these binary packages: libmina-java - Java network application framework libmina-java-doc - Java network application framework -

Re: RFS: dhcp-probe, another try to request with a lot of update

2008-11-29 Thread Laurent Guignard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil Williams a écrit : On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:37:48 +0100 Laurent Guignard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have another question about architecture : How is it possible to check if a package could be built on architecture without the appropriate

Re: RFS: dhcp-probe, another try to request with a lot of update

2008-11-29 Thread Michael Tautschnig
[...] On the upstream README file, Irwin said that : This version runs on Solaris 9 on SPARC, compiled with gcc. So for me, dhcp-probe could be built on this platform. I haven't any possibility to test the package on this type of architecture and i haven't any assigned sponsor too. If

[uploaded] Re: RFS: mina (updated package)

2008-11-29 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: Moving example source code to -doc package seems a rational suggest to me. I've just uploaded a new version including this change to mentors (same debian revision). On its way ;-) Cheers, Vincent -- The moon was high now, in a sky as

Re: RFS: dhcp-probe, another try to request with a lot of update

2008-11-29 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 01:37:48PM +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote: I have another question about architecture : How is it possible to check if a package could be built on architecture without the appropriate hardware ? I can say that dhcp-probe could be build on i386 and any compatible

Re: RFS: dhcp-probe, another try to request with a lot of update

2008-11-29 Thread Neil Williams
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:38:53 +0100 Laurent Guignard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has to build on sparc, you are required to ensure that it does by fixing any FTBFS bugs that appear and those will provide a lot of the information you need to fix the bug. In that case, your sponsor can help

Re: RFS: freespeak

2008-11-29 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Luca Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED] (28/11/2008): I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Taken care of after some modifications. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: freespeak

2008-11-29 Thread Luca Bruno
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 01:26:16AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Luca Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED] (28/11/2008): I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Taken care of after some modifications. Thanks very much for uploading my package. -- http://syx.googlecode.com -

Re: RFS: scim-waitzar, libwaitzar (re-submission) Attn: Paul Wise

2008-11-29 Thread S'orlok Reaves
Thanks for your review; I will address all of your points in turn later. At present, though, there is one in particular I'd like to clarify: Personally I would expect /usr/include/waitzar-1.0/waitzar to be /usr/include/waitzar, since it is that way for most packages. Same for the pkgconfig

RFS: basic256 (updated package)

2008-11-29 Thread Ryan K.
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.2-3 of my package basic256. It builds these binary packages: basic256 - educational BASIC programming environment for children The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: