Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-29 Thread Marco Bertorello
2008/12/26 Weboide webo...@codealpha.net: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package furl. * Package name: furl Version : 2.1-1 Upstream Author : Kidney Bingos aka Chris Williams ch...@kidney-bingos.demon.co.uk * URL :

Re: Creating a deb package that would modify some config files

2008-12-29 Thread Neil Williams
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:18:45 +0100 Francois Goudal f...@satcom1.com wrote: sources.list, and install my packages, and then have a fully working system. Basically, my project is designed to run with a read-only rootfs and have /tmp as a tmpfs, + /etc and /var mounted using a unionfs that would

Creating a deb package that would modify some config files

2008-12-29 Thread Francois Goudal
Hi, I'm quite a noob in the debian package creation stuff. I have a project where I use Debian as the main distrib. I want to package my project using the debian package way, so that anyone could possibly install a usual debian, then add my own repository in the sources.list, and install my

Re: RFS: kita2

2008-12-29 Thread Junichi Uekawa
At Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:25:24 + (UTC), Sune Vuorela wrote: On 2008-12-28, Hiroyuki Yamamoto yama1...@gmail.com wrote: How about kde4? KDE4 has nice ruby bindings, currently available in experimental. Oh, thanks. When kde4 has entered in sid, kita2 should depend on korundum4

Re: RFS: kita2

2008-12-29 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2008-12-29, Junichi Uekawa dan...@netfort.gr.jp wrote: It needs more work than just change the dependencies to make it work with korundum4 Are we talking about a package which only exists in experimental replacing the version in sid? Yes. and the replacement is planned ASAP. Let the

ITA : outguess

2008-12-29 Thread Anthony Gasperin
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package outguess, I am intended to adopt it. I re-built it from scratch and correct lintian warning, there are still two warnings ( man pages for every runable files and although I removed CVS directory, CVS warning still remains ) Please tell me,

Re: ITA : outguess

2008-12-29 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 17:07, Anthony Gasperin anthony.gaspe...@gmail.com wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package outguess, I am intended to adopt it. I re-built it from scratch and correct lintian warning, there are still two warnings ( man pages for every runable

Re: ITA : outguess

2008-12-29 Thread Sandro Tosi
Anthony, reply to me only it's a no-no for mentors. On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 17:18, Anthony Gasperin anthony.gaspe...@gmail.com wrote: I upload the package, I don't know if I did it correctly, it is in the root of ftp://mentors.debian.net. mh.. you have to $ dput mentors pkg.dsc What Do you

RFS: whohas (bug fixes)

2008-12-29 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi Paul (and mentors) I've uploaded whohas/0.21-3 to m.d.n which has patches to close bugs 5099975, 510019 and 509981. They have gone upstream for his next release. If you have a moment to take a look and upload sometime I'd appreciate it. The dsc is at

Re: advise needed for library packaging

2008-12-29 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 29 December 2008 02:01:56 Paul Wise wrote: On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Martin Godisch mar...@godisch.de wrote: I'm not doing library packaging all day and I'm a bit unsure about the new sleuthkit upstream release. It would be nice if some of you could have a look at sleuthkit

Re: advise needed for library packaging

2008-12-29 Thread Neil Williams
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 22:12:24 +0200 George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html http://bugs.debian.org/libpkg-guide Firstly, do you need that library? Nothing in sid seems to depend on it, not even sleuthkit. Library

Re: RFS: whohas (bug fixes)

2008-12-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote: I've uploaded whohas/0.21-3 to m.d.n which has patches to close bugs 5099975, 510019 and 509981. They have gone upstream for his next release. Uploaded. Next time, please depend on ${DPATCH_STAMPFN} instead

Re: advise needed for library packaging

2008-12-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:12 AM, George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote: Why is libfoo-X-dev better than libfooX-dev, where 'X' is being some sort of API version discriminator ? Both of those are the same, my comment was about libfooABI-API-dev vs libfoo-API-dev. -- bye, pabs