Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi Jonathan, On Thu, January 8, 2009 07:26, Paul Wise wrote: On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote: I have uploaded whohas 0.22-1 to m.d.n, which is a new upstream integrating a lot of the bugs, and some tweaks to the packaging because of his

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:00:23AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Great. As I think this can be very useful to Debian developers, I have added a news item to the DeveloperNews queue, which will be posted to debian-devel-annnounce sometime in the near future: http://wiki.debian.org/DeveloperNews

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 03:26:45PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: I've also included a NEWS file detailing the patches that are still active. I don't think that is an appropriate use of NEWS.Debian, documenting them in the patch headers should be enough. You might want to check policy/devref

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote: On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 03:26:45PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: I've also included a NEWS file detailing the patches that are still active. I don't think that is an appropriate use of NEWS.Debian, documenting

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:37:52PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: I interpret that as being the changes since earlier versions of the package, rather than changes to the upstream source code. Ok, if you think README.Debian is acceptable I will move the notes to there. Would you like a version bump

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote: On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:37:52PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: I interpret that as being the changes since earlier versions of the package, rather than changes to the upstream source code. Ok, if you think

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Thu, January 8, 2009 11:19, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Devref mentions NEWS.Debian as a changelog supplement: This is the preferred means to let the user know [...] changes in a package [1]. I didn't use README.Debian as the same paragraph seems to discourage this, but if you think it would

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:52:37PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: Either is fine, slight leaning towards no need for a bump (so I don't have to remember to use debuild -v...). NP, uploaded to the same location. -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E

RFH: dupload outguess.

2009-01-08 Thread Anthony Gasperin
HI, I am interested in adopting outguess package ! I have problems for the dupload, introduction's page at mentors.debian.netgive a configuration for dupload to the root of ftp://mentors.debian.net; but it seems it is not the right place ! I am wondering where should I dupload it. Thanks.

Re: RFH: dupload outguess.

2009-01-08 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 01:18:26PM +0100, Anthony Gasperin wrote: I have problems for the dupload, introduction's page at mentors.debian.netgive a configuration for dupload to the root of ftp://mentors.debian.net; but it seems it is not the right place ! I am wondering where should I

Re: RFH: dupload outguess.

2009-01-08 Thread Stephan Peijnik
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 13:18 +0100, Anthony Gasperin wrote: HI, I am interested in adopting outguess package ! I have problems for the dupload, introduction's page at mentors.debian.net give a configuration for dupload to the root of ftp://mentors.debian.net; but it seems it is not the

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote: On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:52:37PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: Either is fine, slight leaning towards no need for a bump (so I don't have to remember to use debuild -v...). NP, uploaded to the same location. I'd

Re: RFS: scim-waitzar, libwaitzar (re-submission) Attn: Paul Wise

2009-01-08 Thread S'orlok Reaves
Thanks for the feedback. I'm going on a mini-vacation this weekend, so I worked a bit extra to implement your suggestions early --they were all pretty simple to nail down. Re-uploaded: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libwaitzar/

Re: RFS: whohas (new upstream)

2009-01-08 Thread George Danchev
On Friday 09 January 2009 07:38:48 Paul Wise wrote: On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote: On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 07:52:37PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: Either is fine, slight leaning towards no need for a bump (so I don't have to remember to use

Re: RFS: scim-waitzar, libwaitzar (re-submission) Attn: Paul Wise

2009-01-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:27 PM, S'orlok Reaves sorlok_rea...@yahoo.com wrote: Are you able to ship the spec in the source package and generate Myanmar.model from the spec at build time? Or ship a myanmar-spec source package that builds and installs the the Model file? Unfortunately, no. The