Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the new version 0.21-3 of unionfs-fuse in
order to fix an important bug. There is a one byte buffer overflow
(bug#511995). I don't think it can be used to compromise security, but still,
it should be fixed as soon as possible.
It builds these
Hi DD,
I found a very nice little program to take pictures from a webcam, and
I would like to package it.
The original tarball already contains a debian subdirectory (which
needs some corrections anyway), how should I deal with that?
If I dh_make straight after unpacking the tarball, dh_make
Luca Niccoli wrote:
The original tarball already contains a debian subdirectory (which
needs some corrections anyway), how should I deal with that?
If I dh_make straight after unpacking the tarball, dh_make won't
modify the debian subdirectory; but I wonder if removing it beforehand
will
2009/1/28 Al Nikolov a.niko...@drweb.com:
Luca Niccoli wrote:
The original tarball already contains a debian subdirectory (which
needs some corrections anyway), how should I deal with that?
If I dh_make straight after unpacking the tarball, dh_make won't
modify the debian subdirectory; but I
Hi
Dne Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:59:03 + (BST)
Dmitrijs Ledkovs dmitrij.led...@gmail.com napsal(a):
I have a similar question. Upstream has file ./debian/files in their tarball.
Lintian complained about that file so I've deleted it. But during build in
pbuilder
it gets added back from the
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 03:59:03PM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
I have a similar question. Upstream has file ./debian/files in their tarball.
Lintian complained about that file so I've deleted it. But during build in
pbuilder
it gets added back from the orig tarball. How to handle this?
re:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/01/msg00241.html
Alright, I got around to fixing all of Lintian warnings and the other
issues that Rafael Laboissiere found. However, I still don't
understand how to generate debian/symbols in order to satisfy the
Lintian message.
It also
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 16:17 +0100, Luca Niccoli wrote:
I found a very nice little program to take pictures from a webcam, and
I would like to package it.
The original tarball already contains a debian subdirectory (which
needs some corrections anyway), how should I deal with that?
If I
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:12:00AM -0600, Jordi Guti??rrez Hermoso wrote:
it? I've been reading the dpkg-gensymbols manpage and chapter 8 in
Policy, but I still don't understand how to generate the symbol list
http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/mole/seedsymbols has some autogenerated
symbols files
* Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso jord...@gmail.com [2009-01-28 10:12]:
re:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/01/msg00241.html
Alright, I got around to fixing all of Lintian warnings and the other
issues that Rafael Laboissiere found. However, I still don't
understand how to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mathieu, Daniel,
Sorry for the late response, it's until now that I'm reading old messages
from -mentors.
Mathieu Parent wrote:
2008/11/29 Mathieu Parent math.par...@gmail.com:
2008/11/27 Raphael Geissert atomo64+deb...@gmail.com:
[...]
I recommend that you repack your tarball, renaming the debian
directory inside it to debian-upstream or something similar. And you
should check with upstream if they'd be willing to stop shipping
debian/* in their next releases.
(The recommendation above is my opinion, and there are other DDs who
René Mayorga wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:38:32AM +, Antonio Radici wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.14-1
of my package libgstreamer-perl.
Are you aware of the Debian Perl Group?
Maybe your package can be team maintained there.
The package appears to be
Hi Raphael, Daniel,
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Raphael Geissert
atomo64+deb...@gmail.com wrote:
(...)
Mathieu Parent wrote:
Just this: in debian/rules check-dfsg should be marked as a PHONY target as
well.
Done. I've uploaded the new version. Thanks.
Daniel, since you are
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Luca Niccoli lultimou...@gmail.com wrote:
The original tarball already contains a debian subdirectory (which
needs some corrections anyway), how should I deal with that?
Once lenny is released (hint hint) you will be able to just use the
dpkg-source v3 format,
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:01:29PM +, Antonio Radici wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.4-1
of my package battery-stats.
Hi,
Since battery-stats 0.3.3-2 is in testing you shouldn't upload a new
upstream release in unstable[1]. experimental is still an
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qrupdate.
Package name: qrupdate
Version : 1.0-1
Upstream Author : Jaroslav Hájek high...@gmail.com
URL : http://qrupdate.sf.net
License : GPLv3
Section : libs
It builds these binary
Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:01:29PM +, Antonio Radici wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.4-1
of my package battery-stats.
Hi,
Since battery-stats 0.3.3-2 is in testing you shouldn't upload a new
upstream release in unstable[1].
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
jord...@gmail.com wrote:
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qrupdate/qrupdate_1.0-1.dsc
Some comments on just the diff.gz:
You should use a Debian-specific SONAME if upstream doesn't have one.
Please teach upstream
Hi,
To begin, I think there's some confusion about UID and OID. They
are actually the same thing, according to Clunie:
What DICOM calls UIDs are referred to in the
ISO OSI world as Object Identifiers (OIDs).
What Mathieu is talking about is the UID Root (or org root,
according to DICOM
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 07:44:27PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Hi,
To begin, I think there's some confusion about UID and OID. They
are actually the same thing, according to Clunie:
What DICOM calls UIDs are referred to in the
ISO OSI world as Object Identifiers (OIDs).
May I
21 matches
Mail list logo
