Re: RFS: keysafe (updated package)

Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:06:09PM +, Magnus Therning wrote: I'll take your suggestion under consideration, though I have to say I can't think of a better noun to use ATM. I'll think about it for a while and see if something pops into the old noggin.

RFS: Authomated theorem prover E (AKA eprover)

Hi, I created a package for The Equational Theorem Prover E and I'm looking for a sponsor that would help me to get it into the Debian repository. My package can be found at: https://petr.pudlak.name/deb/ The original site: http://www.eprover.org/ (Detailed description can be found there.)

Re: RFS: rsplib

Dear George, Thank you for your review of the RSPLIB package for Debian. I have just uploaded an updated version to the mentors server, which fixes the problems found: http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor- pkglist?action=details;package=rsplib I took some time to look at it and found out

Re: RFS: kompozer - complete Web Authoring System

Hi, jredr...@debian.org ha scritto: Hi Giuseppe, I'm interesting in sponsoring this package, but before checking it, a previous question: why have you packaged versión 0.7.10 instead of the latest available version 0.8a1? I packaged the svn revision 117, the last available

RFS: subnetcalc

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package subnetcalc. subnetcalc is a simple IPv4 subnet address calculator. For given IP address and netmask, it calculates network address, broadcast address, maximum number of hosts and host address range. Also, it prints the addresses in binary

Re: RFS: subnetcalc

On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:59:33 +0100, Thomas Dreibholz wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package subnetcalc. subnetcalc is a simple IPv4 subnet address calculator. For given IP address and netmask, it calculates network address, broadcast address, maximum number of hosts and host

packaging without make

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I intend to package a web based application which does not contain a build system - no Makefile etc. What is the best way to approach this situation in my package? Create a Makefile or whatever? - -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get

orig tarball in conflict with debian policy

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, What is the proper way of dealing with a orig tarball where both naming and internal structure is in conflict with debian policy? Especially the internal structure is a problem since it prevents using the dh-tools in debian. example: orig

Re: orig tarball in conflict with debian policy

Michael Rasmussen wrote: example: orig tarball: foo-y.y.z.tgz internal structure: foo\... I may be jumping to conclusions here, but you mean the name of the archive is against policy because it's not in the foo_x.y.z.orig.tar.gz format? Renaming it to the right format is perfectly in order in

Re: packaging without make

At Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:19:28 +0100, Michael Rasmussen wrote: I intend to package a web based application which does not contain a build system - no Makefile etc. What is the best way to approach this situation in my package? Create a Makefile or whatever? You can probably do everything

Re: orig tarball in conflict with debian policy

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:49:44 +0100 Leo \costela\ Antunes cost...@debian.org wrote: I may be jumping to conclusions here, but you mean the name of the archive is against policy because it's not in the foo_x.y.z.orig.tar.gz format? The tarball

Re: packaging without make

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:35:39 -0400 David Bremner brem...@unb.ca wrote: You can probably do everything you need from debian/rules, since that is a Makefile. Otherwise you probably end up introducing a patch system, making a patch the makes the

Re: orig tarball in conflict with debian policy

On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Michael Rasmussen wrote: Hi all, What is the proper way of dealing with a orig tarball where both naming and internal structure is in conflict with debian policy? Especially the internal structure is a problem since it prevents using the dh-tools in debian. example: orig

Re: orig tarball in conflict with debian policy

On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 06:12:15PM +0100, Michael Rasmussen wrote: The source package does not postfix the source folder with version number which will cause lintian to complain. Orig: foo\ subdir1 subdir2 My suggestion: foo-x.y.z\ subdir1 subdir2 dpkg-source

Re: orig tarball in conflict with debian policy

Michael Rasmussen wrote: The tarball was named foo-0.7.2.tgz which I have renamed to foo-0.7.2.tar.gz (actually tar.bz2 since I prefer bzip2) Then what's exactly the problem? Why not rename it to foo_0.7.2.orig.tar.bz2 and be done with it? Note that if upstream uses gzip, it would be nice

Re: [Python-apps-team] RFS: cgmail (adopted)

Hi Dmitrijs, I finally had some time to check at your package: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 00:04, Dmitrijs Ledkovs dmitrij.led...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/2/16 Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org: you'd be welcome to so do :) You can find some documentation at [1] [2] [3], and feel free to ask

I can't start iceweasel

I can't start iceweasel No use for remove and reinstall -- 愿与知交 与子偕作 http://qzier.blogspot.com/ http://qzier.twitter.com

Re: RFS: subnetcalc

On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 04:59:33PM +0100, Thomas Dreibholz wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package subnetcalc. subnetcalc is a simple IPv4 subnet address calculator. For given IP address and netmask, it calculates network address, broadcast address, maximum number of hosts and

Re: I can't start iceweasel

Hello Qzi, On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 00:22, Qzi hotseason...@gmail.com wrote: I can't start iceweasel No use for remove and reinstall This mailing list is not for users support, but for mentoring about Debian packaging. Please refer to debian-u...@lists.debian.org or a localized ml. Please