Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-12 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-1 of my package tmux. Here are some comments: - add FAQ to docs - add CHANGES file as upstream changelog - ITP bug will be closed by the first upload not the first packaging attempt So

Re: debian/rules

2009-03-12 Thread Rogério Brito
On Mar 11 2009, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Thanks for advice and link it can really save frustration. I particularly have no problem with the commented lines (they serve me as a reminder or as a way to put a quick reference on the rules file), but some people really dislike them. I have one other

Re: Fwd: 'uboot-envtools' uploaded to mentors.debian.net

2009-03-12 Thread Rogério Brito
On Mar 09 2009, Luca Capello wrote: On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 19:25:25 +0100, Per Andersson wrote: I have upload the uboot-envtools to mentors.debian.net. Please have a look. I will take care of this. I cc:ed the d-mentors mailing list so people will not do twice the same work. Great for

Re: debian/rules

2009-03-12 Thread Craig Small
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 05:10:38AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: On Mar 11 2009, Jaromír Mike?? wrote: # Add here commands to clean up after the build process. -$(MAKE) -C source/ PREFIX=/usr clean Hummm, here you should also make sure that you don't ignore errors from make (see the

Which package cacher to use?

2009-03-12 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi there. I seem to recall that, in the not so distant past, people were discussing here the subject of package chachers for the use of building (and rebuilding etc) packages from sources, something which is necessary for those that want to help with the mentoring process (or even building their

Re: dpkg-buildpackage -S error

2009-03-12 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Od: Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au So, you're trying to build a source package. debian/rules clean dh_testdir dh_testroot rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp # Add here commands to clean up after the build process. /usr/bin/make PREFIX = /usr clean make: *** empty variable

Re: best practice for updating inetd.conf with a user-chosen port?

2009-03-12 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:56:20PM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: how to had new services in /etc/services database? ciao cate Asking netbase maintainer(s)? Just read /etc/services about that. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: debian/rules

2009-03-12 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Od: Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org it looks fine, but the ultimate answer comes of course from building the binary package and inspecting its contents with dpkg -c. In addition, you can run the checker `lintian' on the .changes file; it will give you a lot of useful stylistic comments.

Re: best practice for updating inetd.conf with a user-chosen port?

2009-03-12 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:56:20PM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: how to had new services in /etc/services database? Asking netbase maintainer(s)? Just read /etc/services about that. Hmm. Reading your and dato answers, it seems I wrote wrongly my mail. The

Re: debian/rules

2009-03-12 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Od: Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br # Add here commands to clean up after the build process. -$(MAKE) -C source/ PREFIX=/usr clean Hummm, here you should also make sure that you don't ignore errors from make (see the hyphen that was put there). Are current versions of dh_make

Re: best practice for updating inetd.conf with a user-chosen port?

2009-03-12 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Donnerstag, 12. März 2009, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: But now I'm not sure about: - if it is a good thing to have admin choosed ports I dont think so and I guess I'm not alone and thats why there is no best practice to do that. The only (typo of) package where I can think off where

Re: Which package cacher to use?

2009-03-12 Thread Simon Waters
Rogério Brito wrote: So, I would like to ask you: * what is the package chacher that you are using? Squid * Is it able to cope with multiple architectures? Yes * Can it support multiple distributions? Supporting Debian, Ubuntu and other non-official repositories would be really

Re: best practice for updating inetd.conf with a user-chosen port?

2009-03-12 Thread Eric Cooper
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 02:13:12PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: On Donnerstag, 12. März 2009, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: But now I'm not sure about: - if it is a good thing to have admin choosed ports I dont think so and I guess I'm not alone and thats why there is no best practice to do

Re: RFS: libmx4j-java (updated package)

2009-03-12 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Hi Damien, Hi Varun, [...] The new package still fails to build on many archs and I am not sure why. Could you please check? There is some massive libraries transitions ongoing in unstable. Since yesterday (11/03), there is +3000 uninstallable packages [2]. In our issue, default-jdk isn't

Re: Which package cacher to use?

2009-03-12 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Thursday 12 March 2009 03:32:35 Rogério Brito wrote: * what is the package chacher that you are using? approx * Is it able to cope with multiple architectures? Yes. * Can it support multiple distributions? Supporting Debian, Ubuntu and other non-official repositories would be really

sudo pbuilder build - error

2009-03-12 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Hello, I just trying build package from source and getting this error: ~$ sudo pbuilder build '/home/mira/JK/jkmeter_0.4.0-1.dsc' --buildresult /home/mira ### # Add here commands to install the package into debian/jkmeter. /usr/bin/make -C source/ PREFIX=/usr

Re: sudo pbuilder build - error

2009-03-12 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 07:40:42PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: /usr/bin/install: cannot create regular file `/usr/bin/jkmeter': Permission denied At a guess, the upstream build process isn't taking any notice of your DESTDIR. But if you can put the source somewhere visible, it will be much

Re: sudo pbuilder build - error

2009-03-12 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Od: Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 07:40:42PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: /usr/bin/install: cannot create regular file `/usr/bin/jkmeter': Permission denied At a guess, the upstream build process isn't taking any notice of your DESTDIR. But if you can

Re: best practice for updating inetd.conf with a user-chosen port?

2009-03-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Eric Cooper e...@cmu.edu writes: Regarding the other thread in -devel about the future of inetd: in my case I found it very sensible to jettison all the code for opening sockets, binding ports, handling IPv6, handling tcp-wrappers, daemonizing processes, etc. and punt it to inetd. Since apt

Re: best practice for updating inetd.conf with a user-chosen port?

2009-03-12 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Giacomo A. Catenazzi c...@debian.org writes: Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:56:20PM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: how to had new services in /etc/services database? Asking netbase maintainer(s)? Just read /etc/services about that. Hmm. Reading your and dato

RFS: crrcsim

2009-03-12 Thread Loïc Fejoz
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package crrcsim. * Package name: crrcsim Version : 0.9.10-1 Upstream Authors : Ahmet Inan, Bob Parks, Chris Bailey, Jan Edward Kansky kan...@ll.mit.edu, Jan Reucker jan.reuc...@web.de, Jens Wilhelm Wulf jens...@gmx.net, Joel

Re: sudo pbuilder build - error

2009-03-12 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 08:18:45PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: At a guess, the upstream build process isn't taking any notice of your DESTDIR. But if you can put the source somewhere visible, it will be much easier to advise. In attachment is my debianized source ... Yes, as I thought

Re: sudo pbuilder build - error

2009-03-12 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Dear Jonathan, thank you a lot for very complex answer you really moved me forward. You answered so many unspoken questions. I know that there is one unsolved dependency in unstable for this package and I am waiting for upgrading of this library. So I will start with another package for now and

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-12 Thread Ben Finney
Karl Ferdinand Ebert ferdi1...@gmx.de writes: Hi, Am Thursday 12 March 2009 07:37:11 schrieb Kapil Hari Paranjape: On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: The package appears to be lintian clean. Not so! :-( There are Lintian errors in your manpage (hyphen used as minus

Re: RFS: crrcsim

2009-03-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Loïc Fejoz l...@fejoz.net wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package crrcsim. * Package name    : crrcsim ...  Section         : contrib/games It builds these binary packages: crrcsim    - Model-Airplane Flight Simulator You might want to join the

Re: RFS: crrcsim

2009-03-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Loïc Fejoz l...@fejoz.net wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package crrcsim. * Package name    : crrcsim ...  Section         : contrib/games ... http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/c/crrcsim/crrcsim_0.9.10-1.dsc According to debian-policy,

Re: sudo pbuilder build - error

2009-03-12 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Od: Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk Your build-depends should have upstream version numbers, not revisions, like this: libclxclient-dev (= 3.3.2) instead of libclxclient-dev (= 3.3.2-1) Are all those build-depends really neccessary? INSTALL only mentions libclthreads and