Dearest mentors,
Hope you all aren't to busy with the flood gates now open.
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.1-1
of my package parcellite.
It builds these binary packages:
parcellite - lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager
The package appears to be lintian clean and successfully
Hi Ben
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:05:07AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Salvatore Bonaccorso salvatore.bonacco...@gmail.com writes:
cd /tmp/buildd
PKGNAMES=$(ls -d */)
for PKG in $PKGNAMES; do
if [ -d $PKG ]; then
cd $PKG
dpkg-buildpackage -tc
fi
done
AA Hi Dmitry
AA I hope you are fine.
AA I sent you a email with several RFS two days ago, but I don't know if
AA you received it, because I can't found the email in my sent mail, may
AA be I lost it :(
AA Well,
AA I send this email trying to found a sponsor for the package centerim.
AA
On 11693 March 1977, Dominik Smatana wrote:
Or should I edit these files and add missing licenses (copy paste
from main file)?
Talk to upstream. Unless you have written the files it is *NOT* yours to
declare them being licensed in whatever way.
--
bye, Joerg
vorlon hmm, I should fill in the
Hello,
thank you for answers.. I'll contact upstream author.
One more license-newbie question:
In some upstream source files there is just one single line comment at
beginning:
// Please see included LICENSE.TXT
licensecheck says UNKNOWN of course...
Is such reference to external file
Hi all,
I am looking for a sponsor for my set of OFED infiniband packages.
OFED provides a validated stack of kernel drivers and userspace libraries and
utilities for use with Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) capable fabrics,
including Infiniband and ethernet.
http://www.openfabrics.org/
Laurent Guignard lguignard.deb...@gmail.com writes:
On jeu, 19 mar 2009 12:28:02 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Hmm. When I try this on some of my packages it fails, because
apparently ‘dpkg-buildpackage -tc’ isn't how ‘pbuilder’ is running
the program.
How, within a pbuilder hook program,
On jeu, 19 mar 2009 12:28:02 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
$ cat $HOME/.pbuilder/hooks/B10_build-again
#! /bin/sh
This program uses Bashisms, so I've changed the shebang accordingly.
# Build the package again to test for error on double build
Thank you all for help.
Finally dh_install --sourcedir=debian/tmp and mylib.install files tweaking
did the job. :)
Kind regards
mira
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package simhash.
* Package name: simhash
Version : 0.0.20090101-1
Upstream Author : Bart Massey b...@cs.pdx.edu
* URL : http://wiki.cs.pdx.edu/forge/simhash.html
* License : BSD
Section : utils
It
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
A workaround is to add -Wl,--as-needed to LDFLAGS, Gentoo has a
document about that here:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/asneeded.xml
Please note that using --as-needed can cause other (worse) problems.
Just curiosity,
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 01:17 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.2-1
of my package nautilus-share.
It builds these binary packages:
nautilus-share - Nautilus extension to share folder using Samba
The package appears to be lintian
Hi!
After a discussion on #debian-mentors and other places, I will not
sponsor packages using the copyright file format described on
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
It is a too complex, overengineered solution to a very minor issue.
It is not easy readables for humans
It is
0.7.2-3 now. Fixed icon names in 04_use_correct_icon.patch.
--
Chow Loong Jin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
Sage Weil s...@newdream.net writes:
Three binary packages are built:
ceph - server daemons, utilities
ceph-fuse - FUSE-based client
ceph-kclient-source - source for kernel client module
The package description should conform to the
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
Upstream Author : Sage Weil s...@newdream.net
ceph-kclient-source - source for kernel client module
Do you plan to get the kernel module merged into Linux at some point?
Hi alltogether
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:47:24PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
On jeu, 19 mar 2009 12:28:02 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Hmm. When I try this on some of my packages it fails, because
apparently ‘dpkg-buildpackage -tc’ isn't how ‘pbuilder’ is running
the program.
How,
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 11:43:40 Peter Pentchev wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hello Peter,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package confget.
* Package name: confget
Version : 1.01-1
Upstream Author : Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net (myself)
* URL :
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:51:25AM +0100, Dominik Smatana wrote:
Hello,
thank you for answers.. I'll contact upstream author.
One more license-newbie question:
In some upstream source files there is just one single line comment at
beginning:
// Please see included LICENSE.TXT
Hi Matt,
On Thursday 19 March 2009 00:32:55 Matthew Johnson wrote:
On Sun Mar 15 23:58, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
On Sunday 15 March 2009 21:09:33 Matthew Johnson wrote:
Hi Damien, I'm looking at it now, I've got a couple of points,
Hi, sorry for the delay.
Sounds reasonable: I've
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 04:40:33PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
After a discussion on #debian-mentors and other places, I will not
sponsor packages using the copyright file format described on
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
I like the format, and I will only sponsor NEW
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:40:33 + (UTC)
Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote:
After a discussion on #debian-mentors and other places, I will not
sponsor packages using the copyright file format described on
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
As I said during one of those
(We're now in ‘debian-legal’ territory; please follow up there.)
Dominik Smatana dominik.smat...@gmail.com writes:
One more license-newbie question:
In some upstream source files there is just one single line comment at
beginning:
// Please see included LICENSE.TXT
licensecheck says
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:58:34PM +0200, George Danchev wrote:
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 11:43:40 Peter Pentchev wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hello Peter,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package confget.
* Package name: confget
Version : 1.01-1
Upstream Author : Peter
Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk writes:
After a discussion on #debian-mentors and other places, I will not
sponsor packages using the copyright file format described on
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
For those who weren't present when you were having that IRC
discussion, can
Sage Weil s...@newdream.net writes:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
In particular, it should tell the administrator, who should be
assumed to know *nothing* about the package, a brief answer to the
question ÿÿwhat is this and why should I install it?ÿÿ I don't
think the above
Hi.
Sorry Dmitry, I lost the email. May be it goes to the spam folder, I
don't know.
Ok, I will update the debian/copyright file with your comments.
Thank you.
I received and answered your mail.
Check your mail-server :)
DEO Hi, Anibal!
DEO
DEO I think You must to add a few copiryght
On Thursday 19 March 2009 23:12:22 Peter Pentchev wrote:
--cut--
It took me some time to assimilate the hardening notes at wiki.d.o [1],
I'm remotely familiar with, though this document is informative enough
about potential build and run-time failures on different architectures
wrt
On Thu Mar 19 21:01, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
Ok, can I suggest a compromise. Build-depend on default-jdk and then at
build time compile with default-jdk and, if openjdk is installed, use it
to run the test suite.
It would make the build nondeterministic between different host with
(Now including debian-policy; this bears on how to interpret §12.5
w.r.t. changing the FSF's address in an upstream license grant.)
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
Le Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 05:37:08PM +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
If we distribute a package with ‘debian/copyright’ so
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
Do you agree with Eduardo's argument below:
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI edua...@kalinowski.com.br writes:
IANAL, but I don't think the address is part of the license. I
believe the address can be changed to reflect the correct
information, if the rest
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
A workaround is to add -Wl,--as-needed to LDFLAGS, Gentoo has a
document about that here:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/asneeded.xml
Please note
32 matches
Mail list logo
