Hello mentors,
having this output on $ pbuilder create --distribution sid --mirror
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian
xargs: xargs.c:443: main: Assertion `bc_ctl.arg_max = (131072-2048)' failed.
/usr/lib/pbuilder/pbuilder-modules: line 254: 10233 Broken pipe
find $1 -xdev \( \! -type d
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz wrote:
xargs: xargs.c:443: main: Assertion `bc_ctl.arg_max = (131072-2048)' failed.
...
Can somebody advise me please what does it mean?
Seems fairly obvious from Google:
Hi,
System: debian 5
arch: amd64
during preparing package rm_essentials i got this issue:
dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library
it would not be anything surprising in this but before packaging I insert in
place this libs.
Here is rules files, section:
binary-arch: build install
Hi,
Ok I WNPP stuff should be ok now. libchamplain closes #498369 ITP:
libchamplain and libchamplain-gtk closes #521626 ITP:
libchamplain-gtk.
Please have a look again.
-- Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Should I post a message somewhere when I start to work on a package?
\r
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Yes. You can do it by reportbug
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Grammostola Rosea
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Should I post a message somewhere when I start to work on a package?
\r
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Alex Hermosilla wrote:
Yes. You can do it by reportbug
Specifically 'reportbug wnpp' and follow the prompts.
You may also want to read these:
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
Hello,
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 17:02 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Should I post a message somewhere when I start to work on a package?
as you already sent an email you could fill us in anyways, yes. Is it
something completely new or an update to an existing package?
If it's a new package you
Stephan Peijnik wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 17:02 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Should I post a message somewhere when I start to work on a package?
as you already sent an email you could fill us in anyways, yes. Is it
something completely new or an update to an existing
Hi,
O, I've uploaded an packages and requested for an sponsor, also mailed
it to the list. What is next? Wait and see? But what if potential
sponsors are not satisfied with my package? Can I get some comments, or
does this mean I sit and wait for nothing? It's my first package so,
would be
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 21:00 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Hi,
O, I've uploaded an packages and requested for an sponsor, also mailed
it to the list. What is next? Wait and see? But what if potential
sponsors are not satisfied with my package? Can I get some comments, or
does this mean
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 21:00 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Hi,
O, I've uploaded an packages and requested for an sponsor, also mailed
it to the list. What is next? Wait and see? But what if potential
sponsors are not satisfied with my package? Can I get some comments, or
does this mean
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 20:56 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Stephan Peijnik wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 17:02 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Should I post a message somewhere when I start to work on a package?
as you already sent an email you could fill us in
Hi,
I tried to build jack-mixer, but after running: pbuilder build *.dsc I get:
make[3]: Entering directory
`/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6'
GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE= no --makefile-install-rule
./jack_mixer.schemas
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 17:08 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Don't know if it has something to do with:
fakeroot debian/rules
clean
test -x
debian/rules
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 21:11 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Hi,
I tried to build jack-mixer, but after running: pbuilder build *.dsc I get:
You should probably not use globbing and use pdebuild instead.
When using pdebuild you can change to the source directory and simply
run pdebuild without
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE= no --makefile-install-rule
^
This space should be removed.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Maintainer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Stephan Peijnik wrote:
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 17:08 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Don't know if it has something to do with:
fakeroot debian/rules
clean
test -x
debian/rules
Stephan Peijnik wrote:
Oh, and what jack-mixer package are you talking about? There is no
jack-mixer package in Debian's repository.
It's an new package, filed as RFP bug as jack_mixer
\r
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE= no --makefile-install-rule
^
This space should be removed.
Where can I find this line? I use cdbs.
\r
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:26:14 +0200
Grammostola Rosea rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE= no --makefile-install-rule
^
This space should be removed.
Where can I find this
On Monday 30 March 2009 17:23:48 Peter Pentchev wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hello Peter,
This is not even an RFS :)
Now, seriously - I've prepared a package for dma, the DragonFly Mail
Agent, as ITP'd in my #511410, I've uploaded it to mentors.d.n, and
I've sent out a request for debconf
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:28:16PM +0200, George Danchev wrote:
On Monday 30 March 2009 17:23:48 Peter Pentchev wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hello Peter,
This is not even an RFS :)
Now, seriously - I've prepared a package for dma, the DragonFly Mail
Agent, as ITP'd in my #511410, I've
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 01:04:23PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
I'm *NOT* talking in behalf of the Debian Mono Group, but I really think we
shouldn't break existing scripts/programs/workflows/whatever, and call our
binary as cli-csc.
Hi guys,
according to this message and the previous ones
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
O, I've uploaded an packages and requested for an sponsor, also mailed it to
the list. What is next? Wait and see? But what if potential sponsors are not
satisfied with my package? Can I get some comments, or does this mean I sit
and
Goswin,
Thanks very much for the succinct lesson on biarch and multiarch.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 07:31:18PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
If you want to support 64bit (and n32) gmp on ppc, s390, sparc, mips
and mipsel NOW then look at zlib as an example.
Great. So I've gone through
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
Please have a look again.
I'm not sponsoring new packages at the moment, but here is a review:
If you haven't read libpkg-guide (and its two bugs), please do so.
Please add symbols files.
sed -i -e 's/documentary of/documentation
27 matches
Mail list logo
