2. The upstream tarball is 'nautilus_0.12-beta1-2.tar.gz', and the
changelog version in their packaging is '0.12-1ubuntu1'. I changed
this to '0.12.beta1.2', but now I realise that it will be detected as
an NMU (at least, lintian thinks it is).
This was due to a typo in the changelog, silly
'febootstrap' is like 'debootstrap', but it bootstraps Fedora root
filesystems. It's just a set of shell script wrappers around
'yum/rpm' (also in Debian now), and just like debootstrap it uses
fakeroot and fakechroot so you don't need to be root.
This isn't (yet) a request for sponsorship.
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
This isn't (yet) a request for sponsorship. Just hoping that someone
will take a look at this package to see how I've done. It's been
quite a number of years since I did any Debian packaging, so I've
probably made
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 04:17:13PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
This isn't (yet) a request for sponsorship. Just hoping that someone
will take a look at this package to see how I've done. It's been
quite a number of
Le Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:11:20AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
I'd like people to file bugs against upstream. Doesn't really help me
if they are filed in Debian, unless they are Debian-specific packaging
bugs. What would you suggest instead?
Maybe you can drop an explanation in
Hello again,
This is the third time I'm writing to debian-mentors. I don't know why
nobody replied to my former mails, but maybe I didn't describe the
problem good enough, or the answers to my questions where to obvious.
At packaging mimelib1 from standalone-source I patched the sources to
use
On Sábado 16 Mayo 2009 04:40:17 Patrick Matthäi escribió:
David Palacio schrieb:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kplayer
* debian/control:
- The bugs field is useless here
Now format is useless
- Please add the homepage field
There is a doubled http://
*
Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org writes:
At packaging mimelib1 from standalone-source I patched the sources to
use strncpy/strncat instead of strlcpy/strlcpy along with several
other changes.
Now I tried to check for binary compability with libmimelib1c2a packages
from kdepim 3.5.9
On 2009-05-25, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
The new version of the library is no longer exporting its internal
portability functions. This is good -- libraries should not export
Only lurker is using this library.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
9 matches
Mail list logo