RFS: jigzo (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.1-3 of my package jigzo. It builds these binary packages: jigzo - Photo puzzle game for children jigzo-data - data of Photo puzzle game for children The package appears to be lintian clean. Changelog: * debian/watch:

dependencies of a library-dev package

Hi, I'm packaging a program which needs libgearman-dev to build. The libgearman source includes event.h, but the libgearman-dev package does not depend on libevent. Should my program build-depend on libevent-dev or is it the responsibility of libgearman-dev to depend on libevent-dev? Is it a

Re: dependencies of a library-dev package

Thomas Koch wrote: Hi, I'm packaging a program which needs libgearman-dev to build. The libgearman source includes event.h, but the libgearman-dev package does not depend on libevent. Should my program build-depend on libevent-dev or is it the responsibility of libgearman-dev to depend

RFS: backup-manager (adopted package, RC bug fix)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.8-2 of my package backup-manager. It builds these binary packages: backup-manager - command-line backup tool backup-manager-doc - documentation package for Backup Manager The detailed descriptions follow: ,[ backup-manager ]

RFS: symlinks (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-6 of my package symlinks. It builds this binary package: symlinks - scan/change symbolic links Detailed description: , | Symlinks scans directories for symbolic links and lists them on | stdout. Each link is prefixed with

RFS: vera (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.19-1 of my package vera. It builds these binary packages: dict-vera - Dictionary of computer related acronyms -- dict format vera - Dictionary of computer related acronyms -- info format The detailed descriptions are as

Nomeclator of plugins

Hi, I think I have not seen it in the Debian policies. I have a dual role in one application: developer and co-maintainer. I would like to ask one question that fits in both. I'm in the bulmages project. It's a big piece of software with several applications with libs and plugins. It's a

Re: Nomeclator of plugins

In 200907221847.44193@alaxarxa.net, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: I think I have not seen it in the Debian policies. I have a dual role in one application: developer and co-maintainer. I would like to ask one question that fits in both. I'm in the bulmages project. It's a big piece of

Re: Nomeclator of plugins

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 03:02:19PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: In 200907221847.44193@alaxarxa.net, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: I think I have not seen it in the Debian policies. I have a dual role in one application: developer and co-maintainer. I would like to ask one

different debian/symbols for 32 and 64 bit system?

Hi all, I am upgrading library package here and it seems that dpkg-gensymbols asking different debian/symbols file for my 32bit system and different for 64bit one. Working debian symbols files are in attachments. (they are different in the end of them) Can someone advise me how such issue

Re: different debian/symbols for 32 and 64 bit system?

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 05:06:54AM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Hi all, I am upgrading library package here and it seems that dpkg-gensymbols asking different debian/symbols file for my 32bit system and different for 64bit one. Working debian symbols files are in attachments. (they are

Re: Re: different debian/symbols for 32 and 64 bit system?

Od: Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com see the dpkg-gensymbols manpage. it explains how to use different symbols files for different architectures. I see it now Thank you.. mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?