Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.5-6
of the package preview.app, which i intend to adopt.
It builds these binary packages:
preview.app - General purpose image viewer for GNUstep
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix this bug: 454450
The
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qtsmbstatus.
* Package name: qtsmbstatus
Version : 2.1.2-1
Upstream Author : Daniel Rocher daniel.roc...@adella.org
* URL : http://qtsmbstatus.free.fr/
* License : GPL-2
Section : net
It builds
Hi,
Alessio Treglia ha scritto:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qtsmbstatus.
I'll take a look at it. Will send you a message later.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto:
I'll take a look at it. Will send you a message later.
Uploaded, thanks. Feel free to contact me directly for future uploads of this
package.
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Yavor,
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:45:58PM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
At Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:26:39 -0500,
Barry deFreese wrote:
| avifile-utils: setuid-binary usr/bin/kv4lsetup 4755 root/root
but this override was added by the original maintainer (also
upstream), which of course doesn't
Hi, I'm packaging PythonOCC, and could use a mentor during the
process. I've just now sent in a WNPP/ITP bug report as well:
Bug#558647: ITP: pythonocc -- pythonocc is a computer program whose
purpose is to provide a complete set of python bindings for the
OpenCascade library as well as the GEOM
On So, 29 Nov 2009, Heath Matlock wrote:
Hi, I'm packaging PythonOCC, and could use a mentor during the
process. I've just now sent in a WNPP/ITP bug report as well:
Bug#558647: ITP: pythonocc -- pythonocc is a computer program whose
purpose is to provide a complete set of python bindings
Hi, Manoj:
On Sunday 29 November 2009 04:53:05 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28 2009, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
Hi, Ben:
On Saturday 28 November 2009 08:59:13 Ben Finney wrote:
Jesús M. Navarro jesus.nava...@undominio.net writes:
Not personal but sysadmin related. When I want to
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
Well put the ready package somewhere one can get it and ask again here,
that is the way.
Okay, will do, thank you.
--
Heath Matlock
+1 256 274 4225
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Nov 29 2009, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
Hi, Manoj:
On Sunday 29 November 2009 04:53:05 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28 2009, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
Strongly questionable: notes about package emacs, installed via package
manager might go under /usr/share/doc/emacs, why not.
Hi again, Manoj:
On Sunday 29 November 2009 21:00:14 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
[...]
Well, then don't put the notes there. Select whatever place is
logical to you and your fellow users.
Like... /usr/share/doc/emacs? (again on square one).
But Debian also does not tell you
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:38:32PM +0100, Lucas B. Cohen wrote:
Is it considered acceptable for a package to blindly delete, then
recreate its entire directory under /usr/share/doc upon installation or
upgrade ?
I would consider it extremely unacceptable. Your package can fiddle with files
it
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:59:54PM -0800, Joe Smith wrote:
I'm having an issue with distributing a .deb package that has a dependency
on another .deb package that might not be in an available repository (or the
target may not have a network connection at the time of installation). What
I'd
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 08:08:36AM +0100, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
thanks for this informations!
What informations?
- Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 03:41:39PM +0100, Lucas B. Cohen wrote:
Roger Leigh wrote:
Users don't have write access to anything under /usr in general
(and /usr/share/doc in particular). If they did place files there,
they must have done it after gaining root privs. I.e. they took
Heath Matlock heathmatl...@gmail.com writes:
Hi, I'm packaging PythonOCC, and could use a mentor during the
process. I've just now sent in a WNPP/ITP bug report as well:
You won't get “a mentor”. Rather, ask questions here in public, and get
public answers (from mentors) here in this forum;
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.1-1
of package ocropus, which I intend to co-maintain with Jeffrey
Ratcliffe.
It builds these binary packages:
ocropus - document analysis and OCR system
ocropus-data - document analysis and OCR system --- data files
The
Hello Matt,
Am Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:25:05 +1100 schrieb
Matthew Palmer mpal...@debian.org:
What informations?
This informations:
Am Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:34:04 +0800 schrieb
Paul Wise p...@debian.org:
Packages should definitely not enforce building with ccache.
The right way to
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.0-1 of my package
yorick-spydr: FITS image display and simple analysis.
The package appears to be lintian clean. It can be found on
mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yorick-spydr
- Source
Dear Mentors,
I kindly request you to review my package lbzip2-0.18-1. The package is
located at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lbzip2/
Changes:
* New upstream release:
- Add sanity checks to both decompressors.
- Remove input FILE operands.
- Implement options --keep
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.1.6-9
of orphaned package giflib.
It closes ITA #543841 which I updated earlier this week-end.
It builds these binary packages:
giflib-dbg - library for GIF images (debug)
giflib-tools - library for GIF images (utilities)
libgif-dev
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package wixi.
* Package name: wixi
Version : 1.10-1
Upstream Author : Kess Remmelzwaal k.remmelzw...@planet.nl
* URL : http://wixi.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-2
Section : utils
It builds these
On Thu, Nov 26 2009, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:38:32PM +0100, Lucas B. Cohen wrote:
Is it considered acceptable for a package to blindly delete, then
recreate its entire directory under /usr/share/doc upon installation or
upgrade ?
I would consider it extremely
On Sun, Nov 29 2009, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
here are a lot of things upstream can do that's undone at packaging in
order to comply with Debian policy. If it *were* (a big if, of
course) the policy that local-* files are sacred then something should
be done. On the other hand that finding a
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 03:13:35AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:38:32PM +0100, Lucas B. Cohen wrote:
Is it considered acceptable for a package to blindly delete, then
recreate its entire directory under /usr/share/doc upon installation or
upgrade ?
I would
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:13:51PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26 2009, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:38:32PM +0100, Lucas B. Cohen wrote:
Is it considered acceptable for a package to blindly delete, then
recreate its entire directory under /usr/share/doc
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
You won't get “a mentor”. Rather, ask questions here in public, and get
public answers (from mentors) here in this forum; that way everyone else
has the discussion available.
With that in mind, what is the proper
Heath Matlock heathmatl...@gmail.com writes:
With that in mind, what is the proper way to note that the .deb
doesn't contain the Salome GEOM package? I am building this package
for another package that doesn't require this feature.
I don't really understand the question; the facile answer
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:55:48PM +0100, ERSEK Laszlo wrote:
Dear Mentors,
I kindly request you to review my package lbzip2-0.18-1. The package
is located at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lbzip2/
Changes:
* New upstream release:
- Add sanity checks to both decompressors.
-
29 matches
Mail list logo
