-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Fenio,
I've created one amd64.deb package. Unfortunately I don't have access
to other architectures. The pkg can be found here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/spg/files/spg.0.5.0/spg_0.5.0-1_amd64.deb/download
With regards to sponsoring I was
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 07:57:18AM +, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
I've created one amd64.deb package. Unfortunately I don't have access
to other architectures. The pkg can be found here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/spg/files/spg.0.5.0/spg_0.5.0-1_amd64.deb/download
You need to provide the
Hi,
I'm building a package (aiccu) that creates the config file
(/etc/aiccu.conf) dynamically in the postinst-script. Because of this it
won't show up if you do dpkg -L aiccu.
I tried to add the file /etc/aiccu.conf to 'debian/aiccu.conffiles'
but if I try to build (see below) the package the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Symons schrieb:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.2-1 of my package plait.
It builds these binary packages:
plait - command-line jukebox
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Gilbert schrieb:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package protoaculous.
* Package name: protoaculous
Version : 1
Section : utils
It builds these binary packages:
libjs-protoaculous - A
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Michael Gilbert
michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
libjs-protoaculous - A compressed library containing both prototype and
scriptaculous
...
My motivation for maintaining this package is: many packages embed
protoaculous, which is poor practice from a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Gilbert schrieb:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package yui-compressor.
* Package name: yui-compressor
Version : 2.4.2-1
It builds these binary packages:
yui-compressor - YUI Compressor - The Yahoo!
Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com :
* Package name: protoaculous
You should choose a sexier name... ;-)
--
Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat:
Administration Systeme, Recherche Developpement
+261 34 29 155 34 / +261 33 11 207 36
--
To
Hi Patrick,
Many thanks for looking at my package.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Patrick Matthäi pmatth...@debian.org wrote:
David Symons schrieb:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.2-1 of my package plait.
It builds these binary packages:
plait -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Symons schrieb:
Hi Patrick,
Many thanks for looking at my package.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Patrick Matthäi pmatth...@debian.org wrote:
David Symons schrieb:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.1-1
of my package clamfs.
It builds these binary packages:
clamfs - user-space anti-virus protected file system
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Krzysztof Burghardt schrieb:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.1-1
of my package clamfs.
It builds these binary packages:
clamfs - user-space anti-virus protected file system
The package appears to be
Hello,
Nicolas Alvarez nicolas.alva...@gmail.com wrote:
No, Charles is suggesting putting your package files (eg. your rules script)
in a VCS.
So you mean I should do only the debian directory of the package in an
VCS? Do make this sense for a small package like backup2l?
As normal maintainer
On Wednesday 30,December,2009 09:37 PM, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
Hello,
Nicolas Alvarez nicolas.alva...@gmail.com wrote:
No, Charles is suggesting putting your package files (eg. your rules script)
in a VCS.
So you mean I should do only the debian directory of the package in an
VCS?
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 09:44:55PM -0200, Marcos Talau wrote:
* Christoph Egger (christ...@debian.org) wrote:
[...]
Hm looks better at least. However one Item left. If I remember
right, havin both, quilt in debian/rules is calling for trouble. So
I'd rather prefer to kick all patch
Le Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 02:37:36PM +0100, Joachim Wiedorn a écrit :
Nicolas Alvarez nicolas.alva...@gmail.com wrote:
No, Charles is suggesting putting your package files (eg. your rules
script)
in a VCS.
So you mean I should do only the debian directory of the package in an
VCS? Do make
John Stamp writes:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.8-1
of my package yajl.
It builds these binary packages:
libyajl-dev - Yet Another JSON Library - development files
libyajl-doc - Yet Another JSON Library - library documentation
libyajl1 - Yet Another
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:41:09 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Michael Gilbert
michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
libjs-protoaculous - A compressed library containing both prototype and
scriptaculous
...
My motivation for maintaining this package is: many
Hello Charles,
Thanks for all the detailed help. Every day is a learning day for me.
Fondest regards,
Joachim Wiedorn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:35:48 +0100 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Gilbert schrieb:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package protoaculous.
* Package name: protoaculous
Version : 1
Section :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package numptyphysics.
* Package name: numptyphysics
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Tim Edmonds numptyphys...@gmail.com
* URL : http://numptyphysics.garage.maemo.org/
*
Hi Gabriele
Gabriele Giacone wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package numptyphysics.
As mentioned in the ITP[0], I'd gladly co-maintain/sponsor/whatever
numptyphysics.
* Package name: numptyphysics
Version : 0.3-1
Was 0.3 already released somewhere? I can find no
On Wednesday 30 December 2009 06:26:03 am George Danchev wrote:
Uploaded. Thanks.
P.S. next time please add Depends: ${misc:Depends} to -dev and -doc
binary package sections, though its lack is currently harmless, but
good to be there just in case.
OK, thanks. I'll take care of that on
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package r5u87x.
* Package name: r5u87x
Version : 0.2+r62+dfsg1-1
Upstream Author : Alexander Hixon a...@alexhixon.com
* URL : http://www.bitbucket.org/ahixon/r5u87x/
* License : GPLv2
Section : misc
It
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 06:03:35PM +0100, David Jurenka wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package r5u87x.
* Package name: r5u87x
Version : 0.2+r62+dfsg1-1
Upstream Author : Alexander Hixon a...@alexhixon.com
* URL :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leo costela Antunes wrote:
Was 0.3 already released somewhere? I can find no traces of it either on
the homepage, the maemo.org project page or SVN.
No and yes. There are no 0.3 binary releases but I found this [1]: 7
weeks ago, 0.3.0.3 became
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 06:45:01PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
This package looks really pointless withut the unfree microcode
that has to be downloaded from the internet, right? If so it'll have
to go to contrib, not main.
I agree. I have just uploaded a corrected version.
Thanks for
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package algoscore.
Package name: algoscore
Version : 0.081112-1
Upstream Author : Jonatan Liljedahl li...@kymatica.com
URL : http://kymatica.com/algoscore
License : GPLv3
Section : sound
It
Hello My Dear,
My name is kate It gives me a great pleassure to write you after seen you
profile in this website(muslim.or.id) today which really interest me to have
communication with you if you will have the desire with me so that we can get
to know each other well i will be very happy if you
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote:
No and yes. There are no 0.3 binary releases but I found this [1]: 7
weeks ago, 0.3.0.3 became 0.3.0.7. We could change 0.3 in 0.3.0.7 or we
could follow a svnrevision-based versioning; I packaged the latest
revision
Reinier Haasjes rein...@haasjes.com writes:
I'm building a package (aiccu) that creates the config file
(/etc/aiccu.conf) dynamically in the postinst-script. Because of this it
won't show up if you do dpkg -L aiccu.
This is expected behavior for files created dynamically during postinst.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Wise wrote:
Might be a good idea to poke upstream about actually releasing 0.3 properly.
Upstream poked.
BTW, there are two ITPs, you should resolve that:
http://bugs.debian.org/549357
http://bugs.debian.org/496586
They have been
Just a qiuck note kabikaboo is now hopefully waiting in NEW
Regards
Christoph
--
/\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0xD49AE731
\ /Campaign : CaCert Assurer
X against HTML : Debian Maintainer
/ \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/
http://www.christoph-egger.org/
--
To
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.8+dfsg-4
of my package mantis.
It builds these binary packages:
mantis - web-based bug tracking system
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 471094, 542760, 545406, 545732
Please, consider
Gabriele Giacone wrote:
Leo costela Antunes wrote:
Was 0.3 already released somewhere? I can find no traces of it either on
the homepage, the maemo.org project page or SVN.
No and yes. There are no 0.3 binary releases but I found this [1]: 7
weeks ago, 0.3.0.3 became 0.3.0.7. We could
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote:
They have been forcemerged almost 2 months ago [1]. To close both, in
d/changelog, should I refer to both or referring to master bug (496586)
is enough or being merged closing one of them, the other one is
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package procserv.
* Package name: procserv
Version : 2.5.0-3
Upstream Author : Ralph Lange ralph.la...@bessy.de
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/procserv/
* License : GPLv3
Section : utils
It
2009/12/31 Leo 'costela' Antunes cost...@debian.org:
- [subjective] You don't seem to be shipping a menu entry.
I personally think Debian should remove menu and replace it with
upstreamed patches for FreeDesktop menu support.
- [subjective] I don't believe the debian/clean files are really
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:04 AM, sils s...@powered-by-linux.com wrote:
Please, consider that remaining bugs (#555264,#555265), not afecting
mantis, will be closed manually after this package reach the archive and
i'll be grabbed as new maintainer.
These look like valid bugs to me, why would
Hi Paul,
#555264 was reported from a mass-filing advice, it was about
prototypejs vulnerabilities, but it didn't affects to mantis, because
prototype.js file is not longer distributed in mantis debian package
since version 1.1.2+dfsg-1 (see changelog for more info [0]).
Same thing applies to
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:41 AM, sils s...@powered-by-linux.com wrote:
#555264 was reported from a mass-filing advice, it was about
prototypejs vulnerabilities, but it didn't affects to mantis, because
prototype.js file is not longer distributed in mantis debian package
since version
Paul Wise wrote:
I personally think Debian should remove menu and replace it with
upstreamed patches for FreeDesktop menu support.
Agreed in the long run, but since there are AFAIK (haven't checked in a
while) still some window-managers/desktop-environments that don't fully
support desktop
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:51:14 +0100 Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
Le mardi 29 décembre 2009 21:10:41, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
Hi,
Hi,
[context: I'm the owner of yuicompressor ITP #519938]
I have put together a protoaculous package for the packages currently
embedding it (which of
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Leo costela Antunes
cost...@debian.org wrote:
Paul Wise wrote:
I personally think Debian should remove menu and replace it with
upstreamed patches for FreeDesktop menu support.
Agreed in the long run, but since there are AFAIK (haven't checked in a
while)
Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:41 AM, sils s...@powered-by-linux.com wrote:
#555264 was reported from a mass-filing advice, it was about
prototypejs vulnerabilities, but it didn't affects to mantis, because
prototype.js file is not longer distributed in mantis debian package
Paul Wise wrote:
I don't think I'm seeing the issue here. Care to elaborate a bit more?
Isn't that the whole idea behind patching and running autoreconf in the
first place? If we wanted the changed files produced by autoreconf in
the debian.tar.gz we wouldn't need to run it, right? What am I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
Aside from these remarks, the package seems OK, the manpage is a nice
touch, and I can't seem to replicate the segfaults I was having when I
attempted my ITP.
I'd still suggest co-maintaining it though, just cause I
sils s...@powered-by-linux.com writes:
Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:41 AM, sils s...@powered-by-linux.com wrote:
#555264 was reported from a mass-filing advice, it was about
prototypejs vulnerabilities, but it didn't affects to mantis,
because prototype.js file is
Gabriele Giacone wrote:
Man page is only a bad copy of the homepage.
Regarding segfaults, yesterday evidently I've only chosen the right
moment you were waiting for ;), but given that you already spent a lot
of time and I didn't take it into account and given that I think I
couldn't be useful
Hi Ben,
I appreciate your comments, but i think there's a little mix-up with
this thread. I'm sure it was my fault, let me explain ..
I uploaded a new package release of mantis to mentors to be sponsored. I
adopted this package but everything was in the wrong way, then i tried
to arrange things
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package biabam.
* Package name: biabam
Version : 0.9.7-5
Upstream Author : Mads Martin Jørgensen m...@mmj.dk
* URL : http://mmj.dk/biabam/
* License : GPL v2
Section : mail
It builds these binary
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-gtkglext1.
* Package name: python-gtkglext1
Version : 1.1.0-4
Upstream Author : Naofumi Yasufuku naof...@users.sourceforge.net
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gtkglext/
* License : LGPL
52 matches
Mail list logo
