On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, Pablo Recio Quijano wrote:
--Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-clips.
* Package name: python-clips
Version : 1.0.7.348-1
Upstream Author : Francesco Garosi, fran...@infinito.it
* URL :
On Mon Feb 01 21:15, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
- is there any reason why you are depending on openjdk rather than
default-jdk? If not, you should depend on default-jdk. You should also
probably include the other virtual packages (java6-runtime etc)
- ditto, you should build-dep on
On Tue Feb 02 11:35, Charles Plessy wrote:
Dear Miguel,
this information is outdated as the GPL version 3 is compatible with the
Apache
License version 2.0, see:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
Yes, but the files in question are licenced under Apache 1.1, so this
Paul Wise wrote am 2010-01-22 08:44:
Sounds like an RC bug, either in gnuradio or libsdl.2-dev, depending
on where the -lartsc flag is coming from. sdl-config --libs doesn't
give me -lartsc, so it is probably a gnuradio issue. Please
investigate and file a bug as appropriate.
Thank you Paul
* Jeffrey Ratcliffe jeffrey.ratcli...@gmail.com, 2010-01-24, 12:57:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.00-2
of my package tesseract-eng.
It builds these binary packages:
tesseract-ocr-eng - tesseract-ocr language files for English text
The package appears to be lintian clean.
(Please keep me CC:'d, I'm not subscribed).
When I use linux-any I get the following lintian warning:
W: linuxinfo source: unknown-architecture linux-any
Also I cannot find any notion of this combination in debian-policy,
are you sure this can be uploaded (i.e. this is a bug in lintian?).
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 07:11:57AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.65.6+dfsg-1
of my package gnurobbo.
It builds these binary packages:
gnurobbo - logic game ported from ATARI XE/XL
The package appears to be lintian clean.
Hi Jakub,
Congratulations on becoming a DD!
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 02:05:14PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
W: tesseract-eng source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends tesseract-ocr-eng
I: tesseract-eng source: debian-watch-file-is-missing
I: tesseract-ocr-eng:
* Jeffrey Ratcliffe jeffrey.ratcli...@gmail.com, 2010-02-02, 22:24:
I've uploaded the package again to mentors.
Uploaded, thanks.
--
Jakub Wilk
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:40:44AM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 12:08:33AM -0500, Elías Alejandro wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.3.2-1
of my package bygfoot.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bygfoot/bygfoot_2.3.2-1.dsc
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tacacs+.
* Package name: tacacs+
Version : 4.0.4.19-1
Upstream Author : Shrubbery
* URL : http://www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/
* License : No license, only a copyright file
Section : net
It
On Tuesday 02 February 2010 14:49:37 Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
(Please keep me CC:'d, I'm not subscribed).
When I use linux-any I get the following lintian warning:
W: linuxinfo source: unknown-architecture linux-any
Also I cannot find any notion of this combination in debian-policy,
are
I just wanted to announce gleefully to this list: I just sponsored my
first package, miredo.
A few years ago, this list helped me find sponsors for the packages I
wanted to contribute to Debian. People on the list taught me about being a
friendly mentor and a detailed critic of packages. Now
Asheesh Laroia ashe...@asheesh.org writes:
A few years ago, this list helped me find sponsors for the packages I
wanted to contribute to Debian. People on the list taught me about
being a friendly mentor and a detailed critic of packages. Now I'm a
Debian developer and I can return the favor.
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:08:37PM +0100, Tourneur Henry-Nicolas wrote:
* License : No license, only a copyright file
If there was no license, then you couldn't distribute it. The license
is what is in the COPYING file which is very MIT-like. I'm pretty sure
it's ok.
The package is
Hi,
I'm thinking about tomoyo-ccstools package update but it has a problem.
It has no compatibility with current version (1.6.8) and newer version
(1.7.1). So, I want users would be able to choice continue upgrading or
not with debconf.
I wrote that, but there's a problem - it compares
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:43:49PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
I'm thinking about tomoyo-ccstools package update but it has a problem.
It has no compatibility with current version (1.6.8) and newer version
(1.7.1). So, I want users would be able to choice continue upgrading or
not with
Howdy Python mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new release 3.2-1 of my package
‘python-coverage’. At the request of the current primary maintainer,
Lars Wirzenius, I am taking over as active maintainer for this package
and seeking a sponsor.
It builds these binary packages:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 21:03:40 -0500 (EST)
Asheesh Laroia ashe...@asheesh.org wrote:
I just wanted to announce gleefully to this list: I just sponsored my
first package, miredo.
A few years ago, this list helped me find sponsors for the packages I
wanted to contribute to Debian. People on
Craig Small csm...@debian.org Ecrivait:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:08:37PM +0100, Tourneur Henry-Nicolas wrote:
* License : No license, only a copyright file
If there was no license, then you couldn't distribute it. The license
is what is in the COPYING file which is very MIT-like.
20 matches
Mail list logo
