On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Anton Martchukov an...@martchukov.com wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package opencpn.
Some comments on the debian.tar.gz part of the source package:
Standards-Version is out of date, please read the upgrading document
and make any changes appropriate.
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 04:06:37PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Standards-Version is out of date, please read the upgrading document
and make any changes appropriate.
debian/watch doesn't really need any comments or blank lines, you can
remove them. Same for the comment in debian/rules.
I'd
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Anton Martchukov an...@martchukov.com wrote:
Btw, I noted that most of the packages supply icons to
/usr/share/pixmaps, but some less amount to /usr/share/icons
like in case with OpenCPN. Is there any difference between
those folders, maybe it's better to fix
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 04:47:16PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
I think it would be a good idea, you never know who will look at your
patches and use them blindly.
From the lintian tag info it sounds like it is worth it. You'll want
to remove the files on clean and before ./configure is run.
Ok.
Hi there,
I am trying to use pbuilder but it keeps failing with this error:
The following packages will be REMOVED:
liblzma1{u}
The following partially installed packages will be configured:
pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy
0 packages upgraded, 377 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not
On 2010-02-08 12:35 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I am trying to use pbuilder but it keeps failing with this error:
The following packages will be REMOVED:
liblzma1{u}
The following partially installed packages will be configured:
pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy
0 packages upgraded,
Hello,
I am considering to convert a package from 1.0 to 3.0 (quilt) format.
I found documentation in dpkg-source(1) and on the wiki, but I still
miss some information.
For the 1.0 source format, I can see two practical, equivalent
sub-forms:
1. the packed source, consisting in a .orig.tar.gz
Sven,
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
? gcj-jre-headless: Conflicts: java-gcj-compat-headless ( 1.0.80-6)
but 1.0.80-5.1 is to be installed.
This looks like you've been hit by bug #566514?.
So I guess I have to wait a couple of days for this one.
?
Le Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 02:17:01PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
This is weird. I think this may be caused by libvtk-java:
$ apt-cache depends libvtk-java | grep jpeg
Depends: libjpeg62
However the Build-Dep seems alright:
On 2010-02-08 14:17 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
This is weird. I think this may be caused by libvtk-java:
$ apt-cache depends libvtk-java | grep jpeg
Depends: libjpeg62
However the Build-Dep seems alright:
http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/debianonly/view/vtk/5.4.2-4
...
On 2010-02-08 14:25 +0100, Charles Plessy wrote:
libjpeg8-dev does not provide libjpeg-dev…
The latest version (8-2) does.
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2010-02-08 14:17 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
This is weird. I think this may be caused by libvtk-java:
$ apt-cache depends libvtk-java | grep jpeg
Depends: libjpeg62
However the Build-Dep seems alright:
On 2010-02-08 15:43 +0100, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 02:28:38PM +0100, Sven Joachim a écrit :
On 2010-02-08 14:25 +0100, Charles Plessy wrote:
libjpeg8-dev does not provide libjpeg-dev…
The latest version (8-2) does.
So Matthieu only has to wait for version 8-2 to
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tacacs+.
* Package name: tacacs+
Version : 4.0.4.19-1
Upstream Author : Shrubbery
* URL : http://www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/
* License : No license, only a copyright file
Section : net
It
Sorry for the bad subject, I meant RFS, of course.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
I'll take a closer look at the package when I'm on a Debian system.
I took a much closer look at the package and in summary; I'd really
like to sponsor this package but it needs a lot of work upstream,
especially in the
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
For your package, I'll take a look right now. Some feedback:
First of all, you've made it a native package.
Fixed this up (after finally sorting out the difference between - and _
in the filename). Also fixed up the debian version (missing in
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010, Paul Wise wrote:
Upstream keeping debian/ in their tarball is no longer as problematic;
with the dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format, dpkg-source deletes the
debian/ dir unpacked from the upstream orig.tar.gz before extracting
the debian.tar.gz, so the upstream debian/ dir is no
Hi,
Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
For the 3.0 (quilt), the packed source is well defined, but I have a
doubt for the working form. According to dpkg-source(1), is seems to be
the .orig.tar.ext and a working directory with patches applied *and*
present in the debian/patches directory. Is that correct?
On Monday 08 February 2010 19:16:41 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi,
Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
For the 3.0 (quilt), the packed source is well defined, but I have a
doubt for the working form. According to dpkg-source(1), is seems to be
the .orig.tar.ext and a working directory with patches
Le lundi 08 février 2010, Noel David Torres Taño a écrit :
I do not use it that way. I use 3.0 to have several .orig.tgz files and no
patches. This is because my package uses content from several upstreams. Take
that in account when you modify the wiki page, please.
Yes, no problem. Why I
Hello,
My name is Luis Pedro and I would like to join you all, and try to do
something useful for free software. I am familiar with Linux, familiar
with programming, but not much familiar with software development for
Debian Linux. I followed some tutorials from Ubuntu, which is the son
of
Hi Luis,
You should take a look at the documents located at http://www.debian.org/devel/
Namely you should read the New Maintainers Guide:
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/
The Debian Developers' Reference:
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/
And you should also read the
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 01:40:29PM -0800, Chris Taylor wrote:
You should take a look at the documents located at
http://www.debian.org/devel/
Namely you should read the New Maintainers Guide:
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/
The Debian Developers' Reference:
Matthew Palmer wrote:
In addition, the FAQ for this list:
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html might answer some
of your questions.
As a side note, wouldn't the wiki be the perfect place for this?
Don't get me wrong, I totally appreciate the work. It just seems like a
bit
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package pms-linux.
* Package name: pms-linux
Version : 1.20+svn386-1
Upstream Author : ps3mediaserver, shagr4th
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/ps3mediaserver/
* License : GPL v2
Section : video
It
On Monday 08 February 2010 15:26:49 Luis Pedro wrote:
My name is Luis Pedro and I would like to join you all, and try to do
something useful for free software. I am familiar with Linux, familiar
with programming, but not much familiar with software development for
Debian Linux. I followed some
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package jcgui.
* Package name: jcgui
Version : 0.7-1
Upstream Author : Hermann Meyer brumm...@web.de
* URL : http://jcgui.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-2
Section : sound
It builds these binary
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Tourneur Henry-Nicolas wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tacacs+.
I've sponsored and uploaded this package.
- Craig
--
Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
http://www.enc.com.au/
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010, David D Lowe wrote:
On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 21:51 -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
Ping debian-mentors when you've updated README.Debian!
I've updated README.Debian, you can get the new version at:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/ooo-thumbnailer
- Source
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Sage Weil wrote:
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
For your package, I'll take a look right now. Some feedback:
First of all, you've made it a native package.
Fixed this up (after finally sorting out the difference between - and _
in the filename). Also fixed
31 matches
Mail list logo
