Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gkrellm-cpufreq.
* Package name: gkrellm-cpufreq
Version : 0.6.1-1
Upstream Author : Christoph Winkelmann c...@tks6.net
* URL : http://mathicse.epfl.ch/~winkelma/gkrellm2-cpufreq/
* License : GPL
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qhimdtransfer.
It is a software to transfer audio tracks to and from Sony HiMD
and compatible walkman. To my current knowledge, it is the first
software free software and first third-party software to be
able to provide access to HiMD
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7-2
of my package libmatheval.
It builds these binary packages:
libmatheval1 - GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical
expressions (run
libmatheval1-dev - GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical
expressions (dev
I tried e-mailing the vice deb package maintainer, but his maildir is
over quota; what to do now... is there an overseer that I can e-mail
about the maintainer not checking his e-mail?
Best regards,
Norbert
---BeginMessage---
The executable is called x64, the program vice.
What we need is a
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the orphaned package wmmixer.
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload will fix the bug #490739
It updates the packaging to 3.9.1 standard and compatibility 7
The package can be found on http://www.kix.es/src/wmaker/wmmixer/
I would be
On 08/09/10 07:11, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 07.09.2010 21:15, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
On 07/09/10 01:40, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
Hi!
Now I am trying to maintain the database (from 8 months ago), and the
project was moved from sourceforge to git.kernel.org, but there is not a
new version in the
Dear mentors,
I've submitted a ITA to the package medit, and started looking at its
outstanding bugs. I found this #502487[1] and this #465429[2]. My
question is, the first[1] one is already fixed on the current package,
and the second one seems a bit more confuse and I'll try to explain:
The
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 07:24:02PM +0200, N.L.M. de Jonge wrote:
I tried e-mailing the vice deb package maintainer, but his maildir is
over quota; what to do now... is there an overseer that I can e-mail
about the maintainer not checking his e-mail?
It appears that you were attempting to
On 11.09.2010 20:45, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
after the Rafael's reply , what do you think is the next step? Create a
new uswsusp package? wait? do not update the package?
I don't really care enough for uswsusp to give good advice, especially as I
don't use uswsusp (anymore).
Getting a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-09-2010 09:52, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote:
First, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (current maintainer) if you have plans
for Wheezy, please tell me so, if not, why don't you fill and RFH or RFA
?
First, I would have appreciate if you had
Julien Viard de Galbert jul...@vdg.blogsite.org writes:
First, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (current maintainer) if you have
plans for Wheezy, please tell me so, if not, why don't you fill and
RFH or RFA ?
It appears this is the first time you've tried to contact Felipe over
this issue. Why are
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Rodolfo kix Garcia k...@kix.es wrote:
The upload will fix the bug #490739
You should retitle that bug to ITA:
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l3
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#retitle
It updates the packaging to 3.9.1 standard and compatibility 7
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
I'm aware that squeeze is frozen, so any package I could prepare would
go to experimental.
webalizer is not in testing, it can be uploaded to unstable, and then
be made available thru backports.
Kind regards,
Webalizer IS in testing:
13 matches
Mail list logo
