RFS: fdclone (updated package)

2010-10-19 Thread Elías Alejandro
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.00j-1 of my package fdclone. It builds these binary packages: fdclone- console-base lightweight file manager The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 494602 The package can be found on

Re: RFS: nanoblogger (updated package)

2010-10-19 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Mon, 11 Oct 2010 06:45:56 -0500 William Vera bi...@billy.com.mx napsal(a): I have a particular fondness for this package because it was mi first package in debian (more than 5 years) :) Yes I've noticed this. Do you think you have now enough time to spend on package? (AFAIR it was

Re: RFS: nanoblogger (updated package)

2010-10-19 Thread William Vera
Hello! Sure I have enough time for the package! :) Thanks! P.S. Sorry for the ugly email format I'm from my mobile :P Enviado desde mi oficina móvil BlackBerry® -Original Message- From: Michal Čihař mic...@cihar.com Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:26:09 To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: minidlna

2010-10-19 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi, Thanks a lot for your comments, I really appreciate you taking the time. Fernando Lemos wrote: I'm not a DD or a DM, but here's my (very superficial) review, as I'm mildly interested in this package. * It seems that you are missing Build-Depends on libavcodec-dev and libavutil-dev.

Re: RFS: nanoblogger (updated package)

2010-10-19 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:37:17 + William Vera bi...@billy.com.mx napsal(a): Sure I have enough time for the package! :) Okay, I hope it will end up better now :-). Both packages uploaded. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description:

Re: deploying package with NFS

2010-10-19 Thread Bob Proulx
Ben Finney wrote: Richard Hector writes: We've run into an issue here, when we deploy a package (created in-house) on a system that uses NFS for some filesystems. Due to root-squashing, the postinst can't create or chmod/chown the files it needs to. ... * You're root-squashing