* Ruben Molina rmol...@udea.edu.co, 2011-10-18, 20:46:
Your package doesn't respect DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt. Please consider
using dpkg-buildflags to fix this issue. :)
Thanks. I added dpkg-dev to Build-Depends, included
/usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk, and addded a DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS=1 in
Hi,
I am still trying to understand what is going on wrong with my
d/rules file. I can see during the build:
...
dpkg-source: info: applying fix_alphacomp.patch
fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk --buildsystem=cmake --parallel
dh: Unknown sequence
* Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com, 2011-10-19, 10:30:
I am still trying to understand what is going on wrong with my
d/rules file. I can see during the build:
...
dpkg-source: info: applying fix_alphacomp.patch
fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk
Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com writes:
dpkg-source: info: applying fix_alphacomp.patch
fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk --buildsystem=cmake --parallel
dh: Unknown sequence /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk (choose from:
binary binary-arch binary-indep
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
Just enumerate all the targets explicitly, and the problem will go away.
Actually, this. Please disregard my suggestions in my other mail.
--
|8]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hi Paul,
Am Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:02:04 -0500
schrieb Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com:
Perhaps this is offtopic, but there are so many packagers here,
perhaps I can find an answer.
Berlios is closing, I have two small projects, GPLed, that use
subversion and publish tarballs,
Paul Wise wrote:
Completely agreed, please file two bugs against debhelper about this.
Only after reading debhelper's bug logs where the decision was
researched and made to not --parallel by default, please.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello Boris,
On 18.10.2011 13:13, Boris Pek wrote:
So how long I should wait to sent repeated message in these cases?
(Since last message or since first message in that thread)
I am sorry to hear you can't find a sponsor. There is definitively room
for improvements left and we're discussing
El mié, 19-10-2011 a las 12:58 +0200, Jakub Wilk escribió:
* Ruben Molina rmol...@udea.edu.co, 2011-10-18, 20:46:
Your package doesn't respect DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt. Please consider
using dpkg-buildflags to fix this issue. :)
Thanks. I added dpkg-dev to Build-Depends, included
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Joey Hess wrote:
Only after reading debhelper's bug logs where the decision was
researched and made to not --parallel by default, please.
I was not able to find such a bug, could you point it out please?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
Which FAQ do you mean? I admit, there is room for improvement left on
mentors.d.n.
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq
Yes, my pending change on mentors.d.n will outline the role of sponsors
and emphasize communication channels between
On 10/18/2011 11:44 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Oct 18, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Boris Pek wrote:
Of course, I'll disagree about Bazaar there. I think it's actually the most
user friendly of the bunch, and totally up to the task of hosting your
projects. I use it for almost all of mine. I also
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:06:54AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Joey Hess wrote:
Only after reading debhelper's bug logs where the decision was
researched and made to not --parallel by default, please.
I was not able to find such a bug, could you point it out
13 matches
Mail list logo
