Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net writes:
Hello List:
What should be the default target for debian/rules ?
I usually make a help target (or something similar) and make that the
default. But now that you reminded me, I always wanted to make it
display debian/README.source, so I'll just do
Dmitry Smirnov only...@member.fsf.org writes:
Could any of you share experience of having your own private build server?
I'm thinking of something which could build uploaded source for as many
architectures as possible on amd64 host, and ideally put the results to
'reprepro'-managed tree.
On 02/27/2012 05:09 PM, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net writes:
Hello List:
What should be the default target for debian/rules ?
I usually make a help target (or something similar) and make that the
default. But now that you reminded me, I always wanted to
Hi Russ,
On Monday 27 February 2012 17:59:28 Russ Allbery wrote:
Another package I was recently testing on GNU Hurd where some tests were
failing (even though the package is working).
A bug in the test suite? It's worth being careful about assuming that the
package is working when the
Hi Gergely,
Thank you for sharing your experience - very interesting.
Regards,
Dmitry.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Besides the new version of the package, I saw this error for drwright:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/drwright
Package closes bugs in a wrong way
Errors: Bug #654970 does not belong to this package
wnpp: #654970 (wishlist): ITP: drwright -- Typing monitor to force typing
breaks
1. Should
On 27 February 2012 12:15, Savvas Radevic vice...@gmail.com wrote:
Besides the new version of the package, I saw this error for drwright:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/drwright
Package closes bugs in a wrong way
Errors: Bug #654970 does not belong to this package
wnpp: #654970
Hi,
Hm, it doesn't show the error with the new uploaded version, only for the
older versions. Now it says Package closes a WNPP bug with a green colour
instead.
This was discussed yesterday:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/02/msg00687.html
Best wishes,
Boris
--
To
On 18 February 2012 03:52, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
What's an XPS document?
From Wikipedia I've learned that this is somehow related to the Open
XML Paper Specification aka OpenXPS aka ECMA-388, a page description
language intended to occupy some of the same niches as PDF.
Hi everbody,
I'm currently wondering where to check stuff that has changed from one standard
version
to the next (e.g. 3.9.2 vs. 3.9.3) and what is relevant for own packages. Is
there
something like a changelog?
Thank you,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 02:01:57PM +0100, Werner Detter wrote:
I'm currently wondering where to check stuff that has changed from one
standard version
to the next (e.g. 3.9.2 vs. 3.9.3) and what is relevant for own packages. Is
there
something like a changelog?
* Werner Detter wer...@aloah-from-hell.de [120227 14:04]:
I'm currently wondering where to check stuff that has changed from
one standard version to the next (e.g. 3.9.2 vs. 3.9.3) and what is
relevant for own packages. Is there something like a changelog?
Hello,
You may be interested in the
Hi,
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz
Thanks a lot, this is exactly what I was looking for :)
Cheers,
Werner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
W dniu 27.02.2012 14:01, Werner Detter pisze:
Hi everbody,
I'm currently wondering where to check stuff that has changed from one
standard version
to the next (e.g. 3.9.2 vs. 3.9.3) and what is relevant for own packages. Is
there
something like a changelog?
Yes. Just install package
Hi,
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz
Thanks a lot, this is exactly what I was looking for :)
Just for a note. It was the message with brief list of changes:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/02/msg00013.html
Best wishes,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package kismet. I have adopted the
package which was abandoned for 3 years, updated to the latest
upstream version and made some heavy maintenance on the packaging
itself.
* Package name : kismet
Version : 2011.03.R2-1
Upstream
In case someone is tempted to try Build-Depends like check | dpkg,
it doesn't work at all in pbuilder which is smart enough to notice that dpkg
is already installed so it never pulls 'check'.
(Anyway particular example with check is silly because check is available on
all architectures)
Apart
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 05:34 +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
You effort is appreciated but ipset already provided by xtables-addons.
http://xtables-addons.sourceforge.net/
xtables-addons is already in debian, if need ipset compatible with recent
linux kernels.
I think that since ipset is now
On 2012-02-27 10:19, Gergely Nagy wrote:
for arch in amd64 i386; do
for dist in unstable squeeze lucid natty oneiric precise; do
sbuild --arch $arch -d $dist --apend-to-version=~$dist \
-m MadHouse Project Autobuilder packa...@madhouse-project.org \
$1
done
On 02/26/2012 02:05 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
Dear mentors,
Could any of you share experience of having your own private build server?
I'm thinking of something which could build uploaded source for as many
architectures as possible on amd64 host, and ideally put the results to
Hi Nikolai,
Basically what you're talking about is just happened - some hours ago 'ipset'
was accepted to unstable, see
http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ipset.html
When credits for preparing standalone 'ipset' package goes to Neutron Soutmun,
yours truly played a key role in coordinating
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package burp
* Package name: burp
Version : 1.3.1-1
Upstream Author : Graham Keeling keel...@spamcop.net
* URL : http://burp.grke.net/
* License : AGPLv3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 659822 RFS: mpd-sima/0.9.2-1 (New upstream version) tags it +moreinfo
Bug #659822 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: mpd-sima/0.9.1-1 (New upstream version)
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: mpd-sima/0.9.2-1 (New upstream version) tags it
+moreinfo'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 659822 - moreinfo
Bug #659822 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: mpd-sima/0.9.2-1 (New upstream version)
tags it +moreinfo
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #659822 to the same tags previously set
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-tcltk-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tk-html3.
* Package name: tk-html3
Version : 3.0~fossil20110109-1
Upstream Author : Dan Kennedy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libblocxx
* Package name: libblocxx
Version : 2.1.0-1
Upstream Author : 2000-2009 Quest Software, Inc.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors (and others),
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gpart
* Package name: gpart
Version : 0.1h-12
Upstream Author : Michail Brzitwa m...@ichabod.han.de
* URL : http://www.brzitwa.de/mb/gpart/
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tpb
* Package name: tpb
Version : 0.6.4-8
Upstream Author : Markus Braun
* URL : http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/tpb
* License : GPL
Section :
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:45:33 +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
In case someone is tempted to try Build-Depends like check | dpkg,
it doesn't work at all in pbuilder which is smart enough to notice that dpkg
is already installed so it never pulls 'check'.
And it also doesn't work -- the other way
Hi there:
I wanted to adopt a package. I have gone through a lot of documentation but
none really tells me what to do to finally adopt it. I already downloaded
and analyzed the source code so I want to start working on it. Also, what
does maintaining means? Just correcting bugs or improving it?
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a new sponsor for my package postfix-cluebringer
* Package name: postfix-cluebringer
Version : 2.0.11-1
Upstream Author : Nigel Kukard
* URL : http://www.policyd.org
* License
Mauricio Fierro mauriciofier...@gmail.com writes:
I wanted to adopt a package.
Which package? Which bug report number indicates the package is
available for adoption?
I have gone through a lot of documentation but none really tells me
what to do to finally adopt it.
To adopt the package is
Hello,
I already downloaded and analyzed the source code so I want to start
working on it. Also, what does maintaining means? Just correcting
bugs
or improving it? Like UI or something?
Maintaining a package is to do all the work of taking a non-Debian work
and making it a Debian package,
Am Freitag, den 17.02.2012, 12:48 +0100 schrieb Benoît Knecht:
Sorry for the late reply, spare time was quite spare the last days...
Hi Tobias,
As promised, here's my review of your package:
- In debian/solarpowerlog.default, you define /etc/solarpowerlog as
the default RUNDIR;
I'm having trouble uploading a package to mentors.debian.net:
$ dput mentors-ftp libre-jigsaw-pics_2012.02.14-1_amd64.changes
Checking signature on .changes
gpg: Signature made Sun 26 Feb 2012 09:02:18 PM PST using RSA key ID
D8B67ED0
gpg: Good signature from Jonathan Hulka jon.hu...@gmail.com
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com wrote:
But note that Thomas Dickey has prepared a snapshot which is supposed
to do patch #03's job a different way, and fix that dpkg-shlibdeps
warning:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses/2012-02/msg00022.html.
Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:24:32 +1100
with message-id 20120228032432.ga29...@master.debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#658936: RFS: apt-build/0.12.42 [QA] -- frontend to apt
to build, optimize and install packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #658936,
regarding RFS:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ipset
* Package name: ipset
Version : 6.11-2
Upstream Author : Jozsef Kadlecsik kad...@blackhole.kfki.hu
* URL : http://ipset.netfilter.org/
* License :
Hi Neutron,
Just one little suggestion if you excuse me:
Could you please put a short description of bugs you're closing to changelog?
This would be very helpful.
Cheers,
Dmitry.
On Tuesday 28 February 2012 14:28:25 Neutron Soutmun wrote:
* Close bugs that have been reintroduced again since
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package cvc3. This is an existing
package that has been updated for a new upstream version. I haven't been
able to get in touch with my previous sponsor.
Please CC: me in any reply.
Package name :
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Dmitry Smirnov only...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi Neutron,
Just one little suggestion if you excuse me:
Could you please put a short description of bugs you're closing to changelog?
This would be very helpful.
Updated.
Thanks for your suggestion.
Best
41 matches
Mail list logo
