On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 08:08 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
The maintainer didn't answer for more than one month (cc'd again),
however, he publicly stated that he is looking for a comaintainer,
saying feel free to take it over
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=727553
I
Hi Pabs,
Il Giovedì 14 Agosto 2014 5:39, Paul Wise p...@debian.org ha scritto:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package binwalk
binwalk is already in Debian and is maintained by someone else. Please
talk to them about
Hi,
I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package
(pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local
pbuilder (after adding non-free), it fails to build on the buildds [2].
Is there a special thingy that I missed when I specified the dependency?
Also, I am
Il Giovedì 14 Agosto 2014 9:20, Paul Wise p...@debian.org ha scritto:
On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 08:08 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
The maintainer didn't answer for more than one month (cc'd again),
however, he publicly stated that he is looking for a comaintainer,
saying feel
* Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr debian-de...@liska.ath.cx, 2014-08-14, 09:46:
I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package
(pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local
pbuilder (after adding non-free), it fails to build on the buildds [2].
This is bug #690282.
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
* Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr debian-de...@liska.ath.cx, 2014-08-14, 09:46:
I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package
(pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local pbuilder
(after adding non-free), it fails to build on the
Hi,
debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr) writes:
Also, I am wondering about the section and priority: The control file
[3] and the dsc file has contrib/science and optional, but the PTS lists
them as contrib/misc and extra. Who changed that, why is this done, and
shouldn't the
* Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org, 2014-08-14, 10:26:
Also, I am wondering about the section and priority: The control file
[3] and the dsc file has contrib/science and optional, but the PTS
lists them as contrib/misc and extra. Who changed that, why is this
done, and shouldn't the
Hi,
I'm goggling on
https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=libcofoja-java
and have no idea what might be wrong here. A cause for this riddle might be
$ LANG=en apt-cache policy libcofoja-java
libcofoja-java:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.1-r150-2
Version table:
* Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr debian-de...@liska.ath.cx, 2014-08-14, 10:08:
I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package
(pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local
pbuilder (after adding non-free), it fails to build on the buildds [2].
This is bug #690282.
* Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu, 2014-08-14, 10:48:
I'm goggling on
https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=libcofoja-java
This script might be a bit confused.
so we have *both* 1.1-r150-1 and 1.1-r150-2 in unstable. I have no
idea how this can happen. Any clue?
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:42:48AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
In the past two days I've uploaded two packages:
* qpid-dispatch
* qpid-cpp
I can't see mention of either of these in the logs. Are you sure you
uploaded to mentors
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
My ~/.dput.cf file has fqdn = mentors.debian.net as the destination for
uploads. Perhaps it's misconfigured? The full file is:
Did you run `dput mentors ...changes` or `dput ...changes`? The latter
uploads to ftp-master, the former to
Hi Josué,
I have a new, little and last correction. The file README.rst is being
installed in python-twython binary only. There are two ways to fix it:
1. Rename d/docs to python-twython.docs and copy python-twython.docs
as python3-twython.docs or;
2. Remove d/docs and add a 'dh_installdocs -a
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:08:44PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
My ~/.dput.cf file has fqdn = mentors.debian.net as the destination for
uploads. Perhaps it's misconfigured? The full file is:
Did you run `dput mentors ...changes` or
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qpid-cpp
* Package name: qpid-cpp
Version : 0.28-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
*
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br wrote:
Hi Josué,
I have a new, little and last correction. The file README.rst is being
installed in python-twython binary only. There are two ways to fix it:
1. Rename d/docs to python-twython.docs and copy
Your message dated Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:31:15 -0300
with message-id
cap+dxjccrgrwct8wnrdc6rtkwjmaou48_u84ft0wjmac2nc...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#739889: RFS: twython/3.1.2-1 [ITP] -- Pure Python
wrapper for the Twitter API
has caused the Debian Bug report #739889,
regarding RFS:
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
* Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr debian-de...@liska.ath.cx, 2014-08-14, 10:08:
I've uploaded a package to contrib [1], that needs a non-free package
(pgplot5) as build dependency. While it builds nicely on my local pbuilder
(after adding non-free), it fails to build on the
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes:
As I don't really care about Priority and Section for source packages, I
haven't thought further about this and dak currently uses misc:extra for
all of them.
Policy, 5.6.6: Priority
| This field represents how important it is that the user have the
debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr) writes:
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes:
As I don't really care about Priority and Section for source packages, I
haven't thought further about this and dak currently uses misc:extra for
all of them.
Policy, 5.6.6: Priority
| This field
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr) writes:
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes:
As I don't really care about Priority and Section for source packages, I
haven't thought further about this and dak currently uses misc:extra for
all of them.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:48:31AM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qpid-cpp
* Package name: qpid-cpp
Version : 0.28-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of
Hi Darryl,
On 14/08/14 19:15, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:48:31AM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qpid-cpp
* Package name: qpid-cpp
Version :
* Upstream Author : Qpid Development Team d...@qpid.apache.org
* URL : http://qpid.apache.org
* License : Apache 2.0
--
Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com
http://mcpierce.blogspot.com/
Famous last words:
I wonder what happens if we do it this way?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr) writes:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
I'm pretty sure that default is applied before dak ever sees the binary
package priority. (In other words, it's expanded via the build process
before priorities are added to the *.changes file.)
So it is
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Also, dak is canonical for priorities, and values in binary packages
are only used on initial upload to set the initial override value.
From that point forward, changes have to be made via bugs filed with
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org writes:
Initial priorities are set by the ftpmaster that accepted the package from
NEW. They may, or may not match the ones in the package's priority field.
i.e. that field is an _advisory_ field.
This is not what is in the policy. The policy says,
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package kcm-ufw
* Package name: kcm-ufw
Version : 0.4.3-1
* Upstream Author : Craig Drummond craig.p.drumm...@gmail.com
URL :
29 matches
Mail list logo
