On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 14:36 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Hi Gianfranco,
Well, amap has been previously been removed from Debian due to licesnse
reasons. (Please see #346313) You write in #753704 that is no longer is the
case -- I just saw that LICENSE.AMAP is still there
Hi Tobias,
Il Venerdì 5 Settembre 2014 8:46, Tobias Frost t...@debian.org ha scritto:
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 14:36 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Hi Gianfranco,
Well, amap has been previously been removed from Debian due to
licesnse
reasons. (Please see #346313) You
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 12:58:42PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
+++ Andreas Tille [2014-08-04 09:48 +0200]:
on arm*, powerpc, sparc and s390x architectures the build problem is:
third_party/cpuid.h: In constructor 'EbwtTStr::
^^^
I worked around this part of the problem
Le vendredi 05 septembre 2014 à 13:35 +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 12:58:42PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
+++ Andreas Tille [2014-08-04 09:48 +0200]:
ebwt.h:1909: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `popcnt'
make[2]: *** [bowtie-build] Error 1
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 02:15:23PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
ebwt.h:1909: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `popcnt'
make[2]: *** [bowtie-build] Error 1
The relevant line in the code is:
$ grep -w -n asm e*
ebwt.h:1909:asm (popcntq
2014-09-04 18:15 GMT-03:00 Marc Dietrich marvi...@gmx.de:
Hi Eriberto,
Hi Marc,
3. d/control: you need a VCS to control your packaging. I think that
already told you about it. Ask me if you have doubt.
Yes, I original got it wrong thinking it must be the upstream repo. Since I
have no
(This discussion started here[0], but I'm bringing it to a new thread
in hope it's seen by a wider range of people.)
[0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2014/09/msg00034.html
How to proper acknowledge a NMU? As described, I included the NMU
version changelog in debian/changelog
Denis, you must use the #760198 (RFS) bug to ask, not #747700 (New
upstream version 20131230).
Denis, do you saw the message from Vincent Cheng saying about not use
NMU in this package?
I didn't found any new ircii package in mentors.d.o.
Eriberto
2014-09-05 8:28 GMT-03:00 Denis Rodrigues
Hi Marc,
On 05-09-14 16:29, Eriberto Mota wrote:
Not mandatory or recommended by policy. However, a good practice
commonly requested by all sponsors to allow the control of the code by
you or any external people. You must implement it.
Just to be sure, I read this as You must implement it if
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:00:27PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 02:15:23PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
ebwt.h:1909: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `popcnt'
make[2]: *** [bowtie-build] Error 1
The relevant line in the code is:
$
Hi Paul,
2014-09-05 11:52 GMT-03:00 Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org:
Not mandatory or recommended by policy. However, a good practice
commonly requested by all sponsors to allow the control of the code by
you or any external people. You must implement it.
Just to be sure, I read this as You
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 05:16:11PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
ebwt.h:1909: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `popcnt'
make[2]: *** [bowtie-build] Error 1
The relevant line in the code is:
$ grep -w -n asm e*
ebwt.h:1909:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:35:13PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
2. i386 results in
ebwt.h: Assembler messages:
ebwt.h:1909: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `popcnt'
ebwt.h:1909: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `popcnt'
ebwt.h:1909: Error: invalid
* Eduardo M KALINOWSKI edua...@kalinowski.com.br, 2014-09-05, 14:48:
How to proper acknowledge a NMU? As described, I included the NMU
version changelog in debian/changelog after the new version I'm
preparing. From the devref, this appears to be all that's necessary, at
least in my
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 01:35:13PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
2. i386 results in
ebwt.h: Assembler messages:
ebwt.h:1909: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `popcnt'
ebwt.h:1909: Error:
Your message dated Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:24:48 +
with message-id e1xpwjc-0008ov...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: passwordsafe/0.93+dfsg-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #745126,
regarding RFS: passwordsafe/0.93+dfsg-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:24:47 +
with message-id e1xpwjb-0008op...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: django-ratelimit/0.4.0+8+gd58c489-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #756237,
regarding RFS: django-ratelimit/0.4.0+8+gd58c489-3
to be marked as done.
This means
Hello,
I searching a sponsor for pypuppetdb. It's a library needed for puppetboard a
Web
Interface for PuppetDB (ITP: #754796)
python-pypuppetdb is available at Mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/pypuppetdb
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:23:23PM +0200, Jonas Genannt wrote:
Hello,
I searching a sponsor for pypuppetdb. It's a library needed for puppetboard a
Web
Interface for PuppetDB (ITP: #754796)
python-pypuppetdb is available at Mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/pypuppetdb
Hello Andrey,
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pypuppetdb/pypuppetdb_0.1.1+git080614-1.dsc
Could any dd please have a look?
Please file a bug against sponsorship-requests next time.
yes sorry about that. will do it the next time!
Upstream-Contact in d/copyright should
On 5. September 2014 10:14:56 MESZ, Gianfranco Costamagna
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it wrote:
Hi Tobias,
Il Venerdì 5 Settembre 2014 8:46, Tobias Frost t...@debian.org ha
scritto:
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 14:36 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Hi Gianfranco,
Well, amap has
Hi Patrick,
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:22:02AM -0500, Patrick Baggett wrote:
ebwt.h:1909:asm (popcntq %[x],%[count]\n: [count]
=r (count): [x] r (x));
Unless someone investigates why GCC on i386 doesn't know this instruction,
I suggest compiling with POPCNT_CAPABILITY=0
Well, I was kind of hoping upstream could do the heavy lifting here... :)
but yes, I can look at this.
Patrick
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Hi Patrick,
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:22:02AM -0500, Patrick Baggett wrote:
ebwt.h:1909:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package pidgin-privacy-please
* Package name: pidgin-privacy-please
Version : 0.7.1-3
Upstream Author : Stefan Ott
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/pidgin-privacy-please/
*
[Re-try again as my previous question ended up as Message not available
in the mail archive]
Please help me fix the lintian hardening-no-relro problem. As mentioned
before, I've tried several ways myself but none worked. I've uploaded the
source package to
25 matches
Mail list logo
