Hi Tobi, do you plan to do the upload on unstable?
Let me know if I can sponsor the package, seems you already reviewed it ;)
cheers,
Gianfranco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Tonnerre,
do you still need help?
I would like to see an answer to Jonas on the RC bug you are trying to fix,
do you want to move in a team maintained fashion your package?
Another question is: I see a new release is out, do you plan to package it?
cheers,
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Bastien,
security uploads needs usually an ack from Security Team, did you already
receive that'
Second: you asked to upload for stable, oldstable and o-o-stable, but the
debdiff is only against stable.
Does the debdiff applies to the other two suites too?
Let
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Antti,
I did a quick review of the package, since it should be time for
an unstable upload.
Some nitpicks (and some showstoppers to me):
1) d/changelog: please update the changelog to point to unstable suite
(maybe also refresh the timestamp)
2) d/changelog might
Hi Gianfranco,
I did not expect a review so soon, many thanks!
Please find my comments inline with your original email:
On 08/08/15 06:54, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Hi Ghislain,
I did a quick review of this package, and looks mostly good to me, but I have
some
nitpicks (some errors) for
Hi Ghislain,
I did not expect a review so soon, many thanks!
sorry to ruin your Saturday :)
Should be arch:all indeed.
ack
That one is a bit difficult. It is temporarily disabled because at the
time v0.4 was released the test suite was quite buggy and most tests
failed. According to the
Best regards,
Yurii Oleynikov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e58951da-2634-4bc5-bc46-39b3ee38d...@gmail.com
Your message dated Sat, 8 Aug 2015 15:30:01 +0200
with message-id 20150808133001.gk25...@sym.noone.org
and subject line Re: Bug#794540 closed by Bart Martens
ba...@quantz.debian.org (closing RFS: lintian/2.5.35 [RC])
has caused the Debian Bug report #794540,
regarding RFS: lintian/2.5.35 [RC]
to
On 08/08/15 11:06, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Ping me when the new release is up and I'll review it again,
Done.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi Ghislain,
the package looks good!
There still are some copyright issues: e.g.
licensecheck cmake/FindTBB.cmake
cmake/FindTBB.cmake: MIT/X11 (BSD like)
seems that you missed one :)
cheers (sorry for noticing only now)
G.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Your message dated Sat, 08 Aug 2015 16:28:38 +
with message-id e1zo6z8-jm...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: clblas/2.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #794576,
regarding RFS: clblas/2.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 08 Aug 2015 16:28:38 +
with message-id e1zo6z8-jr...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: clfft/2.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #794567,
regarding RFS: clfft/2.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On 08/08/15 15:27, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
There still are some copyright issues: e.g.
licensecheck cmake/FindTBB.cmake
cmake/FindTBB.cmake: MIT/X11 (BSD like)
seems that you missed one :)
No problem, I am the one supposed to get that right. I did not realize
that licensecheck ignores
Dear security team
I am looking for a sponsor for my package imagemagick about a
security fix and I am waiting for your green light.. Fixing #770009
help buildd but is not a security fix (but nevertheless it will help
the infrastructure).
The other ones are DOS
Changes since the last
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-dtcwt
* Package name: python-dtcwt
Version : 0.10.1+dfsg1-2
Upstream Author : Rich Wareham rich.git...@richwareham.com
* URL :
Your message dated Sat, 8 Aug 2015 21:00:06 + (UTC)
with message-id 332569384.1390613.1439067606329.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com
and subject line Re: Bug#794915: revised source package uploaded to mentors
has caused the Debian Bug report #794915,
regarding RFS: compute/0.4-1 [ITP]
to be
Hello Gianfranco and thank you for your review,
1) d/changelog: please update the changelog to point to unstable suite
(maybe also refresh the timestamp)
Ok.
2) d/changelog might benefit of a \n in the first comment line
(after a full stop it is good to go in a new line)
Ok.
3)
Hi Antti,
Not changed yet, but inquiry sent to
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/pkg-qemu-devel/2015-August/006604.html
so if they have good suggestions, then one more upload to mentors
will be needed.
I can't/won't read, but ok, it is good as-is, let me know if you
Hi Helmut,
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 at 07:46:26 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
That was quick. Let me answer some of your comments already. I intend
to take another stab at the upload when I find more time, but that
shall not prevent other interested sponsors from uploading it earlier.
Possibly
Your message dated Sun, 09 Aug 2015 04:26:13 +
with message-id e1zoibz-0006hf...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: safe-iop/0.3.1-1 [ITP] -- Safe integer operations
library
has caused the Debian Bug report #794522,
regarding RFS: safe-iop/0.3.1-1 [ITP] -- Safe integer operations
Hi Felix,
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:53:39PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
...
What works is this:
$ cat syncterm-1.0.tar | tar --delete syncterm-1.0/3rdp/dist/cryptlib.zip
out.tar
-- Would a patch against mk-origtargz that changes to the piped-syntax
for tar invocations be accepted (the
21 matches
Mail list logo
