Hi Lumin,
I didn't mean overriding the env is bad. I mean:
- can we directly add ENVs for users?
- how about doing this in wrapper script:
sed -i -e $a\$(cat /usr/share/.../example/profile) .bashrc
- very bad.
Then can ENVs be handled automatically?
Then there are 2 things to convey
Hi Stephen,
Here are some remaining problems I'd like to see solved before sponsoring
the package.
(1) debian/control:
---
- Concerning git (= 1.8.0): The version in jessie-backports is
2.1, so anyway this condition will be verified in case of a
backport to stable.
Hi Gianfranco Costamagna,
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 08:27 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
yes, exactly the point I had, so somewhere the user should be aware that
reporting
the bug on Debian Bug Tracking System is *wrong*.
and here we are:
how do you say that to the user?
You say
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
* Ole Streicher oleb...@debian.org, 2015-08-16, 19:17:
* Shall it be native? There is no local upstream code, so the
directory is just empty (except the debian/ subdir). However,
native may not the best mark to it, since the package ist not
really a
On 17/08/15 21:53, Oxan van Leeuwen wrote:
Hi,
On 15-08-15 12:21, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
I've tested the AppArmor profile too, it looks fine, although I'm not
sure if 'm' is needed in the profile for '/usr/sbin/postsrsd', since
it seems to work just fine without it. I've a rather basic
Hi everyone,
On 16.08.2015 at 22:53 Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Christian Kastner c...@debian.org, 2015-08-16, 19:08:
debian/rules:
- I believe the export DH_OPTIONS [...] to make magic work can be
dropped. I think this is a remnant from a time long past; I can't find
any reference to this in recent
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Markus,
Following my review:
1)
# upstream does not sign releases
#yadifa source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature
ls upstream/signing-key.asc
upstream/signing-key.asc
which one is correct?
2) sbin/yadifad/install-sh
not mentioned in copyright
(and every
Am Mittwoch, den 10.06.2015, 19:15 -0400 schrieb Yaroslav Halchenko:
to see this package in Debian so I can provide review/sponsorship
when
time allows (hopefully in the next day or so).
meanwhile:
- make package really ready -- vcs fields should point to existing
repository. Do
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Adrien, I did have some problem in recreating the pristine tarball,
I had to change back on changelog, and control the source name, and then
git-buildpackage didn't
fail anymore
(and to move back the orig tarball of course)
BuiltSignedUploaded on experimental and tagged
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for actiona 3.9.0-1.
The package is maintained in collab-main/git:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/actiona.git
Changes since the last upload:
actiona (3.9.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 01:29:12PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
* Since the download code if DFSG-Free, the downloader goes to
contrib, independently of the copyright of the data, right?
Right.
which is a bit pity, since the package *is* actually DFSG-free,
including the downloaded
Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:05:20 +0100
with message-id
1439834720.91469.bpmail_high_carr...@web171805.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #795858,
regarding RFS: actiona/3.9.0-1 -- emulate human activity through a powerful GUI
and JavaScript
to be
Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:50:43 + (UTC)
with message-id 1301383542.6354367.1439830243520.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com
and subject line Re: Bug#795876: RFS: fuzzywuzzy/0.6.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #795876,
regarding RFS: fuzzywuzzy/0.6.1-1
to be marked as done.
This
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package fuzzywuzzy
* Package name: fuzzywuzzy
Version : 0.6.1-1
Upstream Author : Adam Cohen a...@seatgeek.com
Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:31:35 +
with message-id e1zrnjv-00089p...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: trac-mercurial/1.0.0.7+hged4f0932196b-1 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #789526,
regarding RFS: trac-mercurial/1.0.0.7+hged4f0932196b-1 [RC]
to be marked as
Hi Gianfranco Costamagna,
On Sun, 2015-08-16 at 07:26 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
yes, this is not a problem, and this is already done locally (manually) by
many
folks.
But who will take care of packaging bug x for package y installed with
linuxbrew?
Such packaging bug is
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:11:23AM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
On 13.08.2015 18:17, Andreas Tille wrote:
I confirm that this at least has some effect - unfortunately not the wanted
one sinde the
@BOOST_FILESYSTEM_LIB@ @BOOST_IOSTREAMS_LIB@ @BOOST_SYSTEM_LIB@
placeholders remain
Am Montag, den 17.08.2015, 00:11 +0200 schrieb Gert Wollny:
On 13.08.2015 18:17, Andreas Tille wrote:
I confirm that this at least has some effect - unfortunately not
the wanted
one sinde the
@BOOST_FILESYSTEM_LIB@ @BOOST_IOSTREAMS_LIB@
@BOOST_SYSTEM_LIB@
placeholders
control: owner -1 !
Hi Andreas,
let's review:
1) please use a machine-readable copyright file
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
2) d/compat: please bump to 9
3) d/control: you might want to run wrap-and-sort to clean the formatting up,
to bump debhelper to =9 and
Hi,
On 15-08-15 12:21, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
I've tested the AppArmor profile too, it looks fine, although I'm not
sure if 'm' is needed in the profile for '/usr/sbin/postsrsd', since
it seems to work just fine without it. I've a rather basic knowledge
about AppArmor, so if you could explain
2015-08-16 23:56 GMT+08:00, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org:
* Alex Vong alexvong1...@gmail.com, 2015-08-16, 19:42:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mlucas/mlucas_14.1-dfsg1.dsc
I don't intend to sponsor this package, but I had a quick look at it:
Thanks for the quick look!
Don't
Hi Lumin
Such packaging bug is upstream bug, and is handled by Homebrew
and Linuxbrew upstream. And files made that trouble was not provided
by Debian package ..
yes, exactly the point I had, so somewhere the user should be aware that
reporting
the bug on Debian Bug Tracking System is
22 matches
Mail list logo