Re: Introduce wrapper package of linuxbrew into Debian

2015-08-17 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Lumin, I didn't mean overriding the env is bad. I mean: - can we directly add ENVs for users? - how about doing this in wrapper script: sed -i -e $a\$(cat /usr/share/.../example/profile) .bashrc - very bad. Then can ENVs be handled automatically? Then there are 2 things to convey

Bug#793171: RFS: git-lfs/0.5.2-1 [ITP]

2015-08-17 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
Hi Stephen, Here are some remaining problems I'd like to see solved before sponsoring the package. (1) debian/control: --- - Concerning git (= 1.8.0): The version in jessie-backports is 2.1, so anyway this condition will be verified in case of a backport to stable.

Re: Introduce wrapper package of linuxbrew into Debian

2015-08-17 Thread lumin
Hi Gianfranco Costamagna, On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 08:27 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: yes, exactly the point I had, so somewhere the user should be aware that reporting the bug on Debian Bug Tracking System is *wrong*. and here we are: how do you say that to the user? You say

Re: Best practices for downloader packages

2015-08-17 Thread Ole Streicher
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes: * Ole Streicher oleb...@debian.org, 2015-08-16, 19:17: * Shall it be native? There is no local upstream code, so the directory is just empty (except the debian/ subdir). However, native may not the best mark to it, since the package ist not really a

Bug#793331: RFS: postsrsd/1.2-1 [ITP]

2015-08-17 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 17/08/15 21:53, Oxan van Leeuwen wrote: Hi, On 15-08-15 12:21, Tomasz Buchert wrote: I've tested the AppArmor profile too, it looks fine, although I'm not sure if 'm' is needed in the profile for '/usr/sbin/postsrsd', since it seems to work just fine without it. I've a rather basic

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/2.0.5-1 [ITP]

2015-08-17 Thread Markus Schade
Hi everyone, On 16.08.2015 at 22:53 Jakub Wilk wrote: * Christian Kastner c...@debian.org, 2015-08-16, 19:08: debian/rules: - I believe the export DH_OPTIONS [...] to make magic work can be dropped. I think this is a remnant from a time long past; I can't find any reference to this in recent

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/2.0.5-1 [ITP]

2015-08-17 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Control: owner -1 ! Hi Markus, Following my review: 1) # upstream does not sign releases #yadifa source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature ls upstream/signing-key.asc upstream/signing-key.asc which one is correct? 2) sbin/yadifad/install-sh not mentioned in copyright (and every

Bug#784898: I would be interested

2015-08-17 Thread Felix Zielcke
Am Mittwoch, den 10.06.2015, 19:15 -0400 schrieb Yaroslav Halchenko: to see this package in Debian so I can provide review/sponsorship when time allows (hopefully in the next day or so). meanwhile: - make package really ready -- vcs fields should point to existing repository. Do

Bug#795858: RFS: actiona/3.9.0-1 -- emulate human activity through a powerful GUI and JavaScript

2015-08-17 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Control: owner -1 ! Hi Adrien, I did have some problem in recreating the pristine tarball, I had to change back on changelog, and control the source name, and then git-buildpackage didn't fail anymore (and to move back the orig tarball of course) BuiltSignedUploaded on experimental and tagged

Bug#795858: RFS: actiona/3.9.0-1 -- emulate human activity through a powerful GUI and JavaScript

2015-08-17 Thread Adrien Cunin
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for actiona 3.9.0-1. The package is maintained in collab-main/git: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/actiona.git Changes since the last upload: actiona (3.9.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium

Re: Best practices for downloader packages

2015-08-17 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 01:29:12PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: * Since the download code if DFSG-Free, the downloader goes to contrib, independently of the copyright of the data, right? Right. which is a bit pity, since the package *is* actually DFSG-free, including the downloaded

Bug#795858: marked as done (RFS: actiona/3.9.0-1 -- emulate human activity through a powerful GUI and JavaScript)

2015-08-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:05:20 +0100 with message-id 1439834720.91469.bpmail_high_carr...@web171805.mail.ir2.yahoo.com and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #795858, regarding RFS: actiona/3.9.0-1 -- emulate human activity through a powerful GUI and JavaScript to be

Bug#795876: marked as done (RFS: fuzzywuzzy/0.6.1-1)

2015-08-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:50:43 + (UTC) with message-id 1301383542.6354367.1439830243520.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com and subject line Re: Bug#795876: RFS: fuzzywuzzy/0.6.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #795876, regarding RFS: fuzzywuzzy/0.6.1-1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#795876: RFS: fuzzywuzzy/0.6.1-1

2015-08-17 Thread Edward Betts
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package fuzzywuzzy * Package name: fuzzywuzzy Version : 0.6.1-1 Upstream Author : Adam Cohen a...@seatgeek.com

Bug#789526: marked as done (RFS: trac-mercurial/1.0.0.7+hged4f0932196b-1 [RC])

2015-08-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:31:35 + with message-id e1zrnjv-00089p...@quantz.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: trac-mercurial/1.0.0.7+hged4f0932196b-1 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #789526, regarding RFS: trac-mercurial/1.0.0.7+hged4f0932196b-1 [RC] to be marked as

Re: Introduce wrapper package of linuxbrew into Debian

2015-08-17 Thread lumin
Hi Gianfranco Costamagna, On Sun, 2015-08-16 at 07:26 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: yes, this is not a problem, and this is already done locally (manually) by many folks. But who will take care of packaging bug x for package y installed with linuxbrew? Such packaging bug is

Re: Bug#795344: libmems-1.6-1: not properly linked to its dependencies

2015-08-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:11:23AM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: On 13.08.2015 18:17, Andreas Tille wrote: I confirm that this at least has some effect - unfortunately not the wanted one sinde the @BOOST_FILESYSTEM_LIB@ @BOOST_IOSTREAMS_LIB@ @BOOST_SYSTEM_LIB@ placeholders remain

Re: Bug#795344: libmems-1.6-1: not properly linked to its dependencies

2015-08-17 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Montag, den 17.08.2015, 00:11 +0200 schrieb Gert Wollny: On 13.08.2015 18:17, Andreas Tille wrote: I confirm that this at least has some effect - unfortunately not the wanted one sinde the @BOOST_FILESYSTEM_LIB@ @BOOST_IOSTREAMS_LIB@ @BOOST_SYSTEM_LIB@ placeholders

Bug#795771: RFS: dblatex/0.3.7-1

2015-08-17 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! Hi Andreas, let's review: 1) please use a machine-readable copyright file http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ 2) d/compat: please bump to 9 3) d/control: you might want to run wrap-and-sort to clean the formatting up, to bump debhelper to =9 and

Bug#793331: RFS: postsrsd/1.2-1 [ITP]

2015-08-17 Thread Oxan van Leeuwen
Hi, On 15-08-15 12:21, Tomasz Buchert wrote: I've tested the AppArmor profile too, it looks fine, although I'm not sure if 'm' is needed in the profile for '/usr/sbin/postsrsd', since it seems to work just fine without it. I've a rather basic knowledge about AppArmor, so if you could explain

Bug#795704: RFS: mlucas/14.1-dfsg1 [ITP] -- program to perform Lucas-Lehmer test on a Mersenne number

2015-08-17 Thread Alex Vong
2015-08-16 23:56 GMT+08:00, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org: * Alex Vong alexvong1...@gmail.com, 2015-08-16, 19:42: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mlucas/mlucas_14.1-dfsg1.dsc I don't intend to sponsor this package, but I had a quick look at it: Thanks for the quick look! Don't

Re: Introduce wrapper package of linuxbrew into Debian

2015-08-17 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Lumin Such packaging bug is upstream bug, and is handled by Homebrew and Linuxbrew upstream. And files made that trouble was not provided by Debian package .. yes, exactly the point I had, so somewhere the user should be aware that reporting the bug on Debian Bug Tracking System is